Autosomal STRs provide genetic evidence for the hypothesis that Tai people originate from southern China.

Hao Sun, Chi Zhou, Xiaoqin Huang, Keqin Lin, Lei Shi, Liang Yu, Shuyuan Liu, Jiayou Chu, Zhaoqing Yang
Author Information
  1. Hao Sun: The Department of Medical Genetics, Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Yunnan, China.

Abstract

Tai people are widely distributed in Thailand, Laos and southwestern China and are a large population of Southeast Asia. Although most anthropologists and historians agree that modern Tai people are from southwestern China and northern Thailand, the place from which they historically migrated remains controversial. Three popular hypotheses have been proposed: northern origin hypothesis, southern origin hypothesis or an indigenous origin. We compared the genetic relationships between the Tai in China and their "siblings" to test different hypotheses by analyzing 10 autosomal microsatellites. The genetic data of 916 samples from 19 populations were analyzed in this survey. The autosomal STR data from 15 of the 19 populations came from our previous study (Lin et al., 2010). 194 samples from four additional populations were genotyped in this study: Han (Yunnan), Dai (Dehong), Dai (Yuxi) and Mongolian. The results of genetic distance comparisons, genetic structure analyses and admixture analyses all indicate that populations from northern origin hypothesis have large genetic distances and are clearly differentiated from the Tai. The simulation-based ABC analysis also indicates this. The posterior probability of the northern origin hypothesis is just 0.04 [95%CI: (0.01-0.06)]. Conversely, genetic relationships were very close between the Tai and populations from southern origin or an indigenous origin hypothesis. Simulation-based ABC analyses were also used to distinguish the southern origin hypothesis from the indigenous origin hypothesis. The results indicate that the posterior probability of the southern origin hypothesis [0.640, 95%CI: (0.524-0.757)] is greater than that of the indigenous origin hypothesis [0.324, 95%CI: (0.211-0.438)]. Therefore, we propose that the genetic evidence does not support the hypothesis of northern origin. Our genetic data indicate that the southern origin hypothesis has higher probability than the other two hypotheses statistically, suggesting that the Tai people most likely originated from southern China.

References

  1. Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Apr;27(4):747-52 [PMID: 20022889]
  2. Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9 [PMID: 22820204]
  3. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jan;62(1):171-80 [PMID: 9443867]
  4. Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 1;24(23):2713-9 [PMID: 18842597]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 29;95(20):11501-3 [PMID: 9751692]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 29;95(20):11763-8 [PMID: 9751739]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 13;108(37):15112-7 [PMID: 21876135]
  8. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Apr;18(4):672-5 [PMID: 11264419]
  9. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jul 28;11:401 [PMID: 20667077]
  10. Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50 [PMID: 19325852]
  11. PLoS One. 2010 Mar 29;5(3):e9895 [PMID: 20360948]
  12. Hum Genet. 2000 Dec;107(6):582-90 [PMID: 11153912]
  13. Genetics. 1972 Mar;70(3):475-90 [PMID: 5024717]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jul 7;273(1594):1595-602 [PMID: 16769629]
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21230-5 [PMID: 19955425]
  16. PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4210 [PMID: 19148289]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 6;104(45):17614-9 [PMID: 17978179]
  18. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):170-7 [PMID: 8583889]
  19. Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87 [PMID: 12930761]
  20. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002 May;118(1):63-76 [PMID: 11953946]
  21. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Sep;9(5):1322-32 [PMID: 21564903]
  22. Mol Ecol. 2002 Sep;11(9):1591-604 [PMID: 12207711]
  23. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jul;25(7):410-8 [PMID: 20488578]
  24. Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Mar;70(3):625-34 [PMID: 11793300]
  25. J Mol Evol. 1983;19(2):153-70 [PMID: 6571220]
  26. Am J Hum Genet. 1967 May;19(3 Pt 1):233-57 [PMID: 6026583]
  27. Curr Biol. 2010 Feb 23;20(4):R188-93 [PMID: 20178766]
  28. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 Jul 1;7(4):574-578 [PMID: 18784791]

MeSH Term

Bayes Theorem
China
Cluster Analysis
Computer Simulation
Ethnicity
Genetic Variation
Human Migration
Humans
Microsatellite Repeats
Principal Component Analysis

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By