Maternal health care utilization in Viet Nam: increasing ethnic inequity.

Mats Målqvist, Ornella Lincetto, Nguyen Huy Du, Craig Burgess, Dinh Thi Phuong Hoa
Author Information
  1. Mats Målqvist: International Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. mats.malqvist@kbh.uu.se

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes that took place between 2006 and 2010 in the inequity gap for antenatal care attendance and delivery at health facilities among women in Viet Nam.
METHODS: Demographic, socioeconomic and obstetric data for women aged 15-49 years were extracted from Viet Nam's Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey for 2006 (MICS3) and 2010-2011 (MICS4). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine if antenatal care attendance and place of delivery were significantly associated with maternal education, maternal ethnicity (Kinh/Hoa versus other), household wealth and place of residence (urban versus rural). These independent variables correspond to the analytical framework of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health.
FINDINGS: Large discrepancies between urban and rural populations were found in both MICS3 and MICS4. Although antenatal care attendance and health facility delivery rates improved substantially between surveys (from 86.3 to 92.1% and from 76.2 to 89.7%, respectively), inequities increased, especially along ethnic lines. The risk of not giving birth in a health facility increased significantly among ethnic minority women living in rural areas. In 2006 this risk was nearly five times higher than among women of Kinh/Hoa (majority) ethnicity (odds ratio, OR: 4.67; 95% confidence interval, CI: 2.94-7.43); in 2010-2011 it had become nearly 20 times higher (OR: 18.8; 95% CI: 8.96-39.2).
CONCLUSION: Inequity in maternal health care utilization has increased progressively in Viet Nam, primarily along ethnic lines, and vulnerable groups in the country are at risk of being left behind. Health-care decision-makers should target these groups through affirmative action and culturally sensitive interventions.

References

  1. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2009;21:57-81 [PMID: 19791699]
  2. Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1225-33 [PMID: 22464386]
  3. Lancet. 2001 May 19;357(9268):1551-64 [PMID: 11377642]
  4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 23;11:120 [PMID: 21605446]
  5. Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1178-80 [PMID: 22464372]
  6. BJOG. 2010 Nov;117(12):1527-36 [PMID: 20937073]
  7. Lancet. 2007 Oct 13;370(9595):1291-2 [PMID: 17933633]
  8. Reprod Health Matters. 2004 Nov;12(24):160-70 [PMID: 15626206]
  9. Popul Stud (Camb). 1982 Nov;36(3):459-74 [PMID: 22077325]
  10. Lancet. 2010 Sep 18;376(9745):991-1023 [PMID: 20833426]
  11. Lancet. 2003 Jul 19;362(9379):233-41 [PMID: 12885488]
  12. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012 Nov;24(6):896-914 [PMID: 23070757]
  13. Lancet. 2011 Feb 5;377(9764):516-25 [PMID: 21269675]
  14. Int J Equity Health. 2012 May 15;11:24 [PMID: 22587740]
  15. BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 11;12:641 [PMID: 22883138]
  16. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(6):561-8 [PMID: 11436479]
  17. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011 Apr;23(2):246-63 [PMID: 21398299]
  18. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):420-7 [PMID: 20539855]
  19. Lancet. 2011 Sep 24;378(9797):1119-20 [PMID: 21937101]
  20. Acta Paediatr. 2011 Mar;100(3):340-6 [PMID: 20958789]
  21. Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Dec;87(12):913-20 [PMID: 20454482]
  22. BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 06;11:690 [PMID: 21896194]
  23. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008 Jan 30;5:3 [PMID: 18234082]
  24. Int J Equity Health. 2012 Aug 17;11:46 [PMID: 22900888]
  25. Lancet. 2011 Jan 29;377(9763):429-37 [PMID: 21269685]
  26. Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;37(1):4-8 [PMID: 18187525]
  27. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(12):1357-68 [PMID: 3070762]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Female
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Maternal Health Services
Middle Aged
Residence Characteristics
Socioeconomic Factors
Vietnam
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0carehealthwomenVietethnicplace2006antenatalattendancedeliveryamongmaternalrural2increasedriskinequityNamMICS32010-2011MICS4significantlyethnicityKinh/HoaversusurbanfacilityalonglinesnearlytimeshigherOR:95%CI:8utilizationgroupsOBJECTIVE:investigatechangestook2010gapfacilitiesMETHODS:Demographicsocioeconomicobstetricdataaged15-49yearsextractedNam'sMultipleIndicatorClusterSurveyMultivariatelogisticregressionperformeddetermineassociatededucationhouseholdwealthresidenceindependentvariablescorrespondanalyticalframeworkCommissionSocialDeterminantsHealthFINDINGS:LargediscrepanciespopulationsfoundAlthoughratesimprovedsubstantiallysurveys863921%76897%respectivelyinequitiesespeciallygivingbirthminoritylivingareasfivemajorityoddsratio467confidenceinterval94-743become201896-39CONCLUSION:InequityprogressivelyprimarilyvulnerablecountryleftbehindHealth-caredecision-makerstargetaffirmativeactionculturallysensitiveinterventionsMaternalNam:increasing

Similar Articles

Cited By