Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic persons with Alzheimer disease neuropathology.

Sarah E Monsell, Charles Mock, Catherine M Roe, Nupur Ghoshal, John C Morris, Nigel J Cairns, Walter Kukull
Author Information
  1. Sarah E Monsell: National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. smonsell@u.washington.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify demographic and clinical features that were associated with expression of symptoms in the presence of Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes.
METHODS: We studied 82 asymptomatic (Clinical Dementia Rating global score = 0) and 824 symptomatic subjects (Clinical Dementia Rating score >0) with low to high AD neuropathologic changes at autopsy who were assessed at 1 of 34 National Institute on Aging-funded Alzheimer's Disease Centers. All subjects underwent a clinical examination within 1 year of death. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with the odds of being asymptomatic vs symptomatic.
RESULTS: Asymptomatic subjects tended to have low neurofibrillary tangle scores but a wide range of neuritic plaque frequencies. There were, however, a few asymptomatic subjects with very high tangle and neuritic plaque burden, as well as symptomatic subjects with few changes. In the multivariable model, asymptomatic subjects were older (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-1.07), had lower clinical Hachinski Ischemic Score (OR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.69-0.97), were less likely to have an APOE ε4 allele (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.16-0.83), and had lower neurofibrillary tangle score (OR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.17-0.45) compared with symptomatic subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Dissociating clinical symptoms from pathologic findings better allows for investigation of preclinical AD. Our results suggest that although the severity of the pathology, particularly neurofibrillary tangles, has a large role in determining the extent of symptoms, other factors, including age, APOE status, and comorbidities such as cerebrovascular disease also explain differences in clinical presentation.

References

  1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;63(2):153-60 [PMID: 16461857]
  2. Neuron. 2009 Aug 13;63(3):287-303 [PMID: 19679070]
  3. Neurobiol Aging. 1997 Jul-Aug;18(4 Suppl):S1-2 [PMID: 9330978]
  4. Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):320-7 [PMID: 21387377]
  5. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2005 Dec;18(4):218-23 [PMID: 16306243]
  6. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007 Jul-Sep;21(3):249-58 [PMID: 17804958]
  7. Brain. 2012 Jul;135(Pt 7):2155-68 [PMID: 22637583]
  8. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):685-91 [PMID: 15939846]
  9. Acta Neuropathol. 2006 Oct;112(4):389-404 [PMID: 16906426]
  10. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011 Feb;37(1):75-93 [PMID: 20946241]
  11. Exp Neurol. 2002 Oct;177(2):475-93 [PMID: 12429193]
  12. Neurology. 1992 Mar;42(3 Pt 1):631-9 [PMID: 1549228]
  13. Neurology. 1992 Sep;42(9):1681-8 [PMID: 1307688]
  14. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Jan 15;153(2):132-6 [PMID: 11159157]
  15. Neurology. 2002 Aug 13;59(3):364-70 [PMID: 12177369]
  16. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012 May;71(5):362-81 [PMID: 22487856]
  17. Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Jul;30(7):1026-36 [PMID: 19376612]
  18. Neurology. 1991 Apr;41(4):479-86 [PMID: 2011243]
  19. Arch Neurol. 2003 May;60(5):753-9 [PMID: 12756140]
  20. Age Ageing. 2006 Mar;35(2):154-60 [PMID: 16414964]
  21. Brain. 2011 Dec;134(Pt 12):3687-96 [PMID: 22102649]
  22. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 May;69(5):493-8 [PMID: 22566581]
  23. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009 Jan;68(1):1-14 [PMID: 19104448]
  24. Brain. 2009 Aug;132(Pt 8):2036-47 [PMID: 19439419]
  25. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Dec;6(4):610-20 [PMID: 22648764]
  26. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007 Dec;66(12):1136-46 [PMID: 18090922]
  27. Neurology. 2007 Jan 16;68(3):223-8 [PMID: 17224578]
  28. JAMA. 2012 May 2;307(17):1798-800 [PMID: 22550192]
  29. Brain Pathol. 2010 Jan;20(1):66-79 [PMID: 19021630]
  30. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006 Jul;65(7):685-97 [PMID: 16825955]
  31. Ann Neurol. 1980 May;7(5):486-8 [PMID: 7396427]
  32. Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Jan;8(1):1-13 [PMID: 22265587]
  33. Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Jan;123(1):1-11 [PMID: 22101365]
  34. Neurology. 2012 Jan 31;78(5):342-51 [PMID: 22282647]
  35. Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4 [PMID: 8232972]
  36. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;16(2):168-74 [PMID: 18239198]
  37. Neurology. 2002 Jun 25;58(12):1791-800 [PMID: 12084879]
  38. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):280-92 [PMID: 21514248]

Grants

  1. P01 AG003991/NIA NIH HHS
  2. U01 AG016976/NIA NIH HHS
  3. UL1 TR000448/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease
Apolipoproteins E
Cardiovascular Diseases
Comorbidity
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Neurofibrillary Tangles
Odds Ratio
Plaque, Amyloid
Prodromal Symptoms
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Severity of Illness Index

Chemicals

Apolipoproteins E

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0=0subjectsclinicalasymptomaticsymptomatic195%symptomsdiseaseADchangesscoreneurofibrillarytangleORCIassociatedAlzheimerneuropathologic82ClinicalDementiaRatinglowhighfactorsoddsneuriticplaquelowerAPOEOBJECTIVES:soughtidentifydemographicfeaturesexpressionpresenceMETHODS:studiedglobal824>0autopsyassessed34NationalInstituteAging-fundedAlzheimer'sDiseaseCentersunderwentexaminationwithinyeardeathLogisticregressionusedevaluatevsRESULTS:Asymptomatictendedscoreswiderangefrequencieshoweverburdenwellmultivariablemodelolderratio[OR]04confidenceinterval[CI]01-107HachinskiIschemicScore69-097lesslikelyε4allele3616-0832817-045comparedCONCLUSIONS:DissociatingpathologicfindingsbetterallowsinvestigationpreclinicalresultssuggestalthoughseveritypathologyparticularlytangleslargeroledeterminingextentincludingagestatuscomorbiditiescerebrovascularalsoexplaindifferencespresentationComparisonpersonsneuropathology

Similar Articles

Cited By