Peer influences on moral disengagement in late childhood and early adolescence.

Simona C S Caravita, Jelle J Sijtsema, J Ashwin Rambaran, Gianluca Gini
Author Information
  1. Simona C S Caravita: C.R.I.d.e.e, Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, L.go Gemelli 1, 20123, Milano, Italy, simona.caravita@unicatt.it.

Abstract

Moral disengagement processes are cognitive self-justification processes of transgressive actions that have been hypothesized to be learned and socialized within social contexts. The current study aimed at investigating socialization of moral disengagement by friends in two developmentally different age groups, namely late childhood (age: 9-10 years; n = 133, 42.9% girls) and early adolescence (age: 11-14 years; n = 236, 40.6% girls) over a 1-year period. Specifically, the current study examined whether similarity in moral disengagement between friends was the result of friends' influence or friend selection. Moreover, gender (42% girls), individual bullying behavior, and perceived popularity status were examined as potential moderators of socialization for moral disengagement within friendship networks. Self-report measures were used to assess moral disengagement, sociometric questions and a peer-nomination scale for friendship networks and bullying behavior, respectively. Longitudinal social network analysis (RSiena) was used to study change of moral disengagement in friendship networks during a 1-year interval. In early adolescence, friends were more likely to be similar to each other over time and this was explained only by influence processes and not by selection processes. Gender, bullying, and perceived popularity did not moderate the friends' influence on moral disengagement over time. Results indicate that self-justification processes change over time already in late childhood, but only in early adolescence this change is likely to be dependent upon peers' moral disengagement.

References

  1. Child Dev. 2012 Nov;83(6):1917-31 [PMID: 22880944]
  2. Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):674-701 [PMID: 8255953]
  3. Dev Psychol. 2013 Jul;49(7):1242-52 [PMID: 22985296]
  4. Child Dev. 2003 Jan-Feb;74(1):205-20 [PMID: 12625446]
  5. Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1619-32 [PMID: 21910534]
  6. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Feb;38(2):197-209 [PMID: 19777337]
  7. Aggress Behav. 2009 Jan-Feb;35(1):57-67 [PMID: 18925635]
  8. Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1288-309 [PMID: 18826526]
  9. J Early Adolesc. 2006;26(4):414-431 [PMID: 18548124]
  10. Aggress Behav. 2012 Sep-Oct;38(5):378-88 [PMID: 22778018]
  11. Aggress Behav. 2012 Nov-Dec;38(6):456-68 [PMID: 22898969]
  12. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;46(2):186-97 [PMID: 15679527]
  13. Child Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;75(1):147-63 [PMID: 15015681]
  14. J Adolesc. 2010 Dec;33(6):837-51 [PMID: 20926127]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Child
Cognition
Female
Friends
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Models, Psychological
Models, Statistical
Moral Development
Peer Group
Psychology, Adolescent
Psychology, Child
Self Report
Social Environment
Socialization

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0disengagementmoralprocessesearlyadolescencestudyfriendslatechildhoodgirlsinfluencebullyingfriendshipnetworkschangetimeself-justificationwithinsocialcurrentsocializationage:yearsn=1-yearexaminedfriends'selectionbehaviorperceivedpopularityusedlikelyMoralcognitivetransgressiveactionshypothesizedlearnedsocializedcontextsaimedinvestigatingtwodevelopmentallydifferentagegroupsnamely9-10133429%11-14236406%periodSpecificallywhethersimilarityresultfriendMoreovergender42%individualstatuspotentialmoderatorsSelf-reportmeasuresassesssociometricquestionspeer-nominationscalerespectivelyLongitudinalnetworkanalysisRSienaintervalsimilarexplainedGendermoderateResultsindicatealreadydependentuponpeers'Peerinfluences

Similar Articles

Cited By