Five-year results of a cementless short-hip-stem prosthesis.

Ralf H Wittenberg, Reinhard Steffen, Henning Windhagen, Petra Bücking, Andreas Wilcke
Author Information
  1. Ralf H Wittenberg: St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Vestische Orthopädische Klinik, Herten;

Abstract

Hip prosthesis stems with a short stem length and proximal fixation geometry support a bone-preserving and muscle-sparing implantation and should also allow for revision surgery with a standard hip stem. We present 250 prospectively documented clinical and radiological results from the Metha Short Hip Stem prosthesis (B. Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) after an average follow-up of 4.9 years. The average patient age at surgery was 60 years. Indication for total hip replacement was primary osteoarthrosis (OA) (78% of patients), OA based on developmental dysplasia of the hip (16%), and other indications (6%). At the last follow-up, the average Harris Hip Score was 97 points. 85% of patients were very satisfied and 14% were satisfied after surgery, whereas 1% were dissatisfied. Pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale improved from 7.4 (min 1.6, max 9.5) pre-operatively to 0.23 (min 0, max 6.6). No joint dislocations occurred when predominantly using 28 mm and 32 mm prosthesis heads. Nine short-stems were revised: three after bacterial infections, two after primary via valsa with penetration of the femoral cortex two and three months after surgery, and three after early aseptic cases of loosening within the first year. A further nine osseously consolidated short-stems had to be replaced due to breakage of the modular titanium cone adapter after an average of 3.1 years (min 1.9, max 4.4). All surgical revisions were performed using primary standard stems. Without taking the material-related adapter failures into account, a five year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of 96.7% (95% confidence interval 93.4-98.3) was determined for the short-stem prostheses. There were no radiological signs of loosening in any of the short-stem prostheses at the last examination. Fine sclerotic lines were detected in Gruen's AP zones 1 (19%) and 2 (10.5%), individual hypertrophies in zone 3 (3.5%), fine seams in zones 4 (5.5%) and 5 (4%), without pedestal formations in zone 4, clear cancellous bone compressions in zone 6 (97.5%), as well as single fine scleroses (1.5%) and atrophies (2.5%) in zone 7. The mid-term clinical results with periprosthetic bone remodeling and without radiological signs of loosening confirm this metaphyseal short-stem treatment and fixation concept and the possibility of revision surgery using standard hip stems. Long-term results must be further observed on a prospective basis as part of this collective study.

Keywords

References

  1. Acta Orthop. 2007 Oct;78(5):616-21 [PMID: 17966020]
  2. Hip Int. 2008 Apr-Jun;18(2):75-80 [PMID: 18645979]
  3. Acta Orthop. 2012 Aug;83(4):360-5 [PMID: 22900913]
  4. Z Orthop Unfall. 2009 Nov-Dec;147(6):700-6 [PMID: 20183747]
  5. Z Orthop Unfall. 2010 Aug;148(4):398-405 [PMID: 20714981]
  6. Z Orthop Unfall. 2011 Apr;149(2):185-90 [PMID: 20938903]
  7. Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):34-41 [PMID: 20180715]
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jun;(141):17-27 [PMID: 477100]
  9. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Sep;82(7):952-8 [PMID: 11041581]
  10. Hip Int. 2011 Sep-Oct;21(5):583-6 [PMID: 21948037]
  11. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Dec;55(8):1629-32 [PMID: 4217797]
  12. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jan 04;11:3 [PMID: 20047653]
  13. Z Orthop Unfall. 2011 Apr;149(2):200-5 [PMID: 21425048]
  14. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007 Oct;83(1):9-15 [PMID: 17318821]
  15. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3(2):117-21 [PMID: 3397741]
  16. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):450-61 [PMID: 21971877]
  17. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Dec;89(12):1574-80 [PMID: 18057355]
  18. Int Orthop. 2012 Mar;36(3):533-8 [PMID: 21935621]
  19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Aug;(257):107-28 [PMID: 2199114]
  20. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Aug;132(8):1125-31 [PMID: 22546932]
  21. Indian J Orthop. 2008 Jul;42(3):252-9 [PMID: 19753149]
  22. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011;69 Suppl 1:S68-76 [PMID: 22035489]
  23. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):425-32 [PMID: 21993977]
  24. Int Orthop. 2011 May;35(5):655-60 [PMID: 20437260]
  25. Orthopade. 2011 Dec;40(12):1075-83 [PMID: 22095459]
  26. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55 [PMID: 5783851]
  27. Orthopade. 2004 Nov;33(11):1243-8 [PMID: 15490116]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.045%prosthesissurgeryhipresults1average63short-stemzoneHipstemsstandardradiologicalfollow-up9yearsprimaryminmax5usingthreelooseningstemfixationrevisionclinicalOApatientslast97satisfied70mmshort-stemstwoyearadapterprosthesessignszones2finewithoutbonemid-termprospectivestudyshortlengthproximalgeometrysupportbone-preservingmuscle-sparingimplantationalsoallowpresent250prospectivelydocumentedMethaShortStemBBraun-AesculapTuttlingenGermanypatientage60Indicationtotalreplacementosteoarthrosis78%baseddevelopmentaldysplasia16%indications6%HarrisScorepoints85%14%whereas1%dissatisfiedPainaccordingVisualAnalogueScaleimprovedpre-operatively23jointdislocationsoccurredpredominantly2832headsNinerevised:bacterialinfectionsviavalsapenetrationfemoralcortexmonthsearlyasepticcaseswithinfirstnineosseouslyconsolidatedreplacedduebreakagemodulartitaniumconesurgicalrevisionsperformedWithouttakingmaterial-relatedfailuresaccountfiveKaplan-Meiersurvivalrate967%95%confidenceinterval934-98determinedexaminationFinescleroticlinesdetectedGruen'sAP19%10individualhypertrophiesseams4%pedestalformationsclearcancellouscompressionswellsinglesclerosesatrophiesperiprostheticremodelingconfirmmetaphysealtreatmentconceptpossibilityLong-termmustobservedbasispartcollectiveFive-yearcementlessshort-hip-stem

Similar Articles

Cited By