Circumcision: what should be done?

Hanoch Ben-Yami
Author Information
  1. Hanoch Ben-Yami: Department of Philosophy, Central European University, 9 Nádor Street, Budapest 1051, Hungary. benyamih@ceu.hu

Abstract

I explain why I think that considerations regarding the opposing rights involved in the practice of circumcision-rights of the individual to bodily integrity and rights of the community to practice its religion-would not help us decide on the desirable policy towards this controversial practice. I then suggest a few measures that are not in conflict with either religious or community rights but that can both reduce the harm that circumcision as currently practiced involves and bring about a change in attitude towards the practice, thus further reducing its frequency. These measures are the compulsory administration of anaesthetics; the banning of the metzitzah b'peh; and having an upper age limit of a few months on non-therapeutic circumcision of minors. I conclude with general considerations on why the steps taken towards the reform of circumcision should be moderate.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Age Factors
Anesthesia
Anesthetics
Attitude
Ceremonial Behavior
Circumcision, Male
Cultural Characteristics
Freedom
Harm Reduction
Human Body
Human Rights
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Personhood
Public Opinion
Religion and Medicine
Suction

Chemicals

Anesthetics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0practicerightstowardscircumcisionconsiderationscommunitymeasuresexplainthinkregardingopposinginvolvedcircumcision-rightsindividualbodilyintegrityreligion-wouldhelpusdecidedesirablepolicycontroversialsuggestconflicteitherreligiouscanreduceharmcurrentlypracticedinvolvesbringchangeattitudethusreducingfrequencycompulsoryadministrationanaestheticsbanningmetzitzahb'pehupperagelimitmonthsnon-therapeuticminorsconcludegeneralstepstakenreformmoderateCircumcision:done?CircumcisionMoralReligiousAspectsRights

Similar Articles

Cited By