Dengue dynamics and vaccine cost-effectiveness in Brazil.

David P Durham, Martial L Ndeffo Mbah, Jan Medlock, Paula M Luz, Lauren A Meyers, A David Paltiel, Alison P Galvani
Author Information
  1. David P Durham: Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States. david.durham@yale.edu

Abstract

Recent Phase 2b dengue vaccine trials have demonstrated the safety of the vaccine and estimated the vaccine efficacy with further trials underway. In anticipation of vaccine roll-out, cost-effectiveness analysis of potential vaccination policies that quantify the dynamics of disease transmission are fundamental to the optimal allocation of available doses. We developed a dengue transmission and vaccination model and calculated, for a range of vaccination costs and willingness-to-pay thresholds, the level of vaccination coverage necessary to sustain herd-immunity, the price at which vaccination is cost-effective and is cost-saving, and the sensitivity of our results to parameter uncertainty. We compared two vaccine efficacy scenarios, one a more optimistic scenario and another based on the recent lower-than-expected efficacy from the latest clinical trials. We found that herd-immunity may be achieved by vaccinating 82% (95% CI 58-100%) of the population at a vaccine efficacy of 70%. At this efficacy, vaccination may be cost-effective for vaccination costs up to US$ 534 (95% CI $369-1008) per vaccinated individual and cost-saving up to $204 (95% CI $39-678). At the latest clinical trial estimates of an average of 30% vaccine efficacy, vaccination may be cost-effective and cost-saving at costs of up to $237 (95% CI $159-512) and $93 (95% CI $15-368), respectively. Our model provides an assessment of the cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccination in Brazil and incorporates the effect of herd immunity into dengue vaccination cost-effectiveness. Our results demonstrate that at the relatively low vaccine efficacy from the recent Phase 2b dengue vaccine trials, age-targeted vaccination may still be cost-effective provided the total vaccination cost is sufficiently low.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccine. 2004 Mar 12;22(9-10):1275-80 [PMID: 15003657]
  2. Lancet. 2012 Nov 3;380(9853):1535-6 [PMID: 22975339]
  3. Med Decis Making. 1998 Apr-Jun;18(2 Suppl):S68-80 [PMID: 9566468]
  4. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Jul;5(7):518-28 [PMID: 17558424]
  5. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Sep;98(9):553-62 [PMID: 15251405]
  6. J Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 1;201(3):370-7 [PMID: 20059357]
  7. Hum Vaccin. 2011 Jul;7(7):776-80 [PMID: 21734468]
  8. Vaccine. 2011 Aug 11;29(35):5860-8 [PMID: 21699949]
  9. Vaccine. 2012 Jul 6;30(32):4892-6 [PMID: 22406455]
  10. Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Jul 1;89(7):476-7 [PMID: 21734760]
  11. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Dec;5(12):e1426 [PMID: 22206028]
  12. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Oct;66(10):934-41 [PMID: 22268129]
  13. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Feb;84(2):200-7 [PMID: 21292885]
  14. Med Decis Making. 2012 May-Jun;32(3):442-6 [PMID: 22472916]
  15. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(4):e390 [PMID: 19399169]
  16. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Mar;16(3):576-8 [PMID: 20202456]
  17. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;77(6):1128-34 [PMID: 18165535]
  18. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 May;80(5):846-55 [PMID: 19407136]
  19. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 May;84(5):764-72 [PMID: 21540387]
  20. Vaccine. 2011 Sep 23;29(42):7229-41 [PMID: 21745521]
  21. Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Jun;11(6):935-42 [PMID: 16772016]
  22. Lancet. 2012 Nov 3;380(9853):1559-67 [PMID: 22975340]
  23. Vaccine. 2011 Sep 23;29(42):7276-84 [PMID: 21781998]

Grants

  1. U01 GM087719/NIGMS NIH HHS
  2. U01GM087719/NIGMS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Brazil
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Dengue
Dengue Vaccines
Humans
Immunity, Herd
Immunization Programs
Models, Economic
Models, Theoretical
Vaccination

Chemicals

Dengue Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinationvaccineefficacydengue95%CItrialscost-effectivenesscost-effectivemaycostscost-savingPhase2bdynamicstransmissionmodelherd-immunityresultsrecentlatestclinicalBrazillowDengueRecentdemonstratedsafetyestimatedunderwayanticipationroll-outanalysispotentialpoliciesquantifydiseasefundamentaloptimalallocationavailabledosesdevelopedcalculatedrangewillingness-to-paythresholdslevelcoveragenecessarysustainpricesensitivityparameteruncertaintycomparedtwoscenariosoneoptimisticscenarioanotherbasedlower-than-expectedfoundachievedvaccinating82%58-100%population70%US$534$369-1008pervaccinatedindividual$204$39-678trialestimatesaverage30%$237$159-512$93$15-368respectivelyprovidesassessmentincorporateseffectherdimmunitydemonstraterelativelyage-targetedstillprovidedtotalcostsufficientlyCost-effectivenessModelingVaccine

Similar Articles

Cited By