Diversification through multitrait evolution in a coevolving interaction.

John N Thompson, Christopher Schwind, Paulo R Guimarães, Magne Friberg
Author Information
  1. John N Thompson: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. jnthomp@ucsc.edu

Abstract

Mutualisms between species are interactions in which reciprocal exploitation results in outcomes that are mutually beneficial. This reciprocal exploitation is evident in the more than a thousand plant species that are pollinated exclusively by insects specialized to lay their eggs in the flowers they pollinate. By pollinating each flower in which she lays eggs, an insect guarantees that her larval offspring have developing seeds on which to feed, whereas the plant gains a specialized pollinator at the cost of some seeds. These mutualisms are often reciprocally obligate, potentially driving not only ongoing coadaptation but also diversification. The lack of known intermediate stages in most of these mutualisms, however, makes it difficult to understand whether these interactions could have begun to diversify even before they became reciprocally obligate. Experimental studies of the incompletely obligate interactions between woodland star (Lithophragma; Saxifragaceae) plants and their pollinating floral parasites in the moth genus Greya (Prodoxidae) show that, as these lineages have diversified, the moths and plants have evolved in ways that maintain effective oviposition and pollination. Experimental assessment of pollination in divergent species and quantitative evaluation of time-lapse photographic sequences of pollination viewed on surgically manipulated flowers show that various combinations of traits are possible for maintaining the mutualism. The results suggest that at least some forms of mutualism can persist and even diversify when the interaction is not reciprocally obligate.

Keywords

References

  1. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 May;43(2):493-501 [PMID: 17289405]
  2. Oecologia. 2012 Feb;168(2):439-48 [PMID: 21833639]
  3. Mol Ecol. 2008 May;17(10):2430-48 [PMID: 18422933]
  4. Am Nat. 2006 Oct;168(4):531-45 [PMID: 17004224]
  5. Am J Bot. 2001 Feb;88(2):196-205 [PMID: 11222242]
  6. Biol Lett. 2012 Apr 23;8(2):258-61 [PMID: 21900312]
  7. Ann Bot. 2012 Mar;109(4):761-72 [PMID: 22278414]
  8. Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1862 Oct;30(60):312-318 [PMID: 30163543]
  9. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Mar;62(3):898-906 [PMID: 22178365]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5264-7 [PMID: 12695568]
  11. Ecol Lett. 2010 Nov;13(11):1368-77 [PMID: 20825452]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 1;89(7):2927-9 [PMID: 11607287]
  13. Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(7):1687-701 [PMID: 22335780]
  14. Science. 2003 Apr 25;300(5619):630-3 [PMID: 12714743]
  15. J Evol Biol. 2009 Jun;22(6):1183-92 [PMID: 19416414]
  16. BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Jul 07;10:204 [PMID: 20604973]
  17. Ann Bot. 2009 Jan;103(1):39-44 [PMID: 18996950]
  18. Biol Lett. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):838-42 [PMID: 20554563]
  19. Am Nat. 2007 Apr;169(4):494-504 [PMID: 17427121]
  20. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jul 1;13(7):259-60 [PMID: 21238293]
  21. Oecologia. 2010 Jan;162(1):71-80 [PMID: 19669796]
  22. Ecology. 2006 Jan;87(1):103-12 [PMID: 16634301]
  23. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 22;272(1577):2195-201 [PMID: 16191630]
  24. Evolution. 2009 Jan;63(1):268-79 [PMID: 19146595]
  25. Ann Bot. 2013 Apr;111(4):539-50 [PMID: 23365407]
  26. Nature. 2002 Jun 13;417(6890):735-8 [PMID: 12066183]
  27. Am Nat. 2008 Jun;171(6):816-23 [PMID: 18462130]

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Physiological
Animals
Biodiversity
Biological Evolution
Insecta
Pollination

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0obligatespeciesinteractionsreciprocallypollinationreciprocalexploitationresultsplantspecializedeggsflowerspollinatingseedsmutualismsdiversifyevenExperimentalplantsshowtraitsmutualisminteractionMutualismsoutcomesmutuallybeneficialevidentthousandpollinatedexclusivelyinsectslaypollinateflowerlaysinsectguaranteeslarvaloffspringdevelopingfeedwhereasgainspollinatorcostoftenpotentiallydrivingongoingcoadaptationalsodiversificationlackknownintermediatestageshowevermakesdifficultunderstandwhetherbegunbecamestudiesincompletelywoodlandstarLithophragmaSaxifragaceaefloralparasitesmothgenusGreyaProdoxidaelineagesdiversifiedmothsevolvedwaysmaintaineffectiveovipositionassessmentdivergentquantitativeevaluationtime-lapsephotographicsequencesviewedsurgicallymanipulatedvariouscombinationspossiblemaintainingsuggestleastformscanpersistDiversificationmultitraitevolutioncoevolvingcoevolutioncorrelatedgeographicdivergencetraitmatching

Similar Articles

Cited By