A simplified PBPK modeling approach for prediction of pharmacokinetics of four primarily renally excreted and CYP3A metabolized compounds during pregnancy.

Binfeng Xia, Tycho Heimbach, Rakesh Gollen, Charvi Nanavati, Handan He
Author Information
  1. Binfeng Xia: Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, DMPK-Translational Sciences, One Health Plaza 436/3253, East Hanover, New Jersey, 07470, USA.

Abstract

During pregnancy, a drug's pharmacokinetics may be altered and hence anticipation of potential systemic exposure changes is highly desirable. Physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) models have recently been used to influence clinical trial design or to facilitate regulatory interactions. Ideally, whole-body PBPK models can be used to predict a drug's systemic exposure in pregnant women based on major physiological changes which can impact drug clearance (i.e., in the kidney and liver) and distribution (i.e., adipose and fetoplacental unit). We described a simple and readily implementable multitissue/organ whole-body PBPK model with key pregnancy-related physiological parameters to characterize the PK of reference drugs (metformin, digoxin, midazolam, and emtricitabine) in pregnant women compared with the PK in nonpregnant or postpartum (PP) women. Physiological data related to changes in maternal body weight, tissue volume, cardiac output, renal function, blood flows, and cytochrome P450 activity were collected from the literature and incorporated into the structural PBPK model that describes HV or PP women PK data. Subsequently, the changes in exposure (area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C max)) in pregnant women were simulated. Model-simulated PK profiles were overall in agreement with observed data. The prediction fold error for C max and AUC ratio (pregnant vs. nonpregnant) was less than 1.3-fold, indicating that the pregnant PBPK model is useful. The utilization of this simplified model in drug development may aid in designing clinical studies to identify potential exposure changes in pregnant women a priori for compounds which are mainly eliminated renally or metabolized by CYP3A4.

References

  1. Mol Pharmacol. 1989 Jul;36(1):89-96 [PMID: 2787473]
  2. Neurology. 2004 Aug 10;63(3):571-3 [PMID: 15304599]
  3. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1979;2(2):85-94 [PMID: 93986]
  4. Hepatology. 1998 Apr;27(4):1056-63 [PMID: 9537446]
  5. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Oct;59(7):553-7 [PMID: 12955370]
  6. Lancet. 2000 Nov 18;356(9243):1735-6 [PMID: 11095263]
  7. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1981;21(2):121-6 [PMID: 7341280]
  8. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980 Aug;28(2):253-61 [PMID: 7398192]
  9. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2011;18(3):e506-12 [PMID: 22113261]
  10. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;74(5):873-85 [PMID: 22725721]
  11. Pharm Res. 2005 Jan;22(1):11-23 [PMID: 15771225]
  12. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38(4):325-8 [PMID: 2140553]
  13. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009 Jan;71(1):1-7 [PMID: 20177448]
  14. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010 May;38(5):833-40 [PMID: 20118196]
  15. Teratology. 1994 Feb;49(2):90-103 [PMID: 8016750]
  16. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Sep;19(3):489-513 [PMID: 954246]
  17. J Clin Pharmacol. 1976 Oct;16(10 Pt 1):461-7 [PMID: 977789]
  18. J Infect Dis. 1977 Sep;136(3):370-6 [PMID: 903675]
  19. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(10):989-1008 [PMID: 16176115]
  20. J Pharm Sci. 2005 Jun;94(6):1259-76 [PMID: 15858854]
  21. Drugs Today (Barc). 2005 Apr;41(4):241-52 [PMID: 16034488]
  22. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002 Mar 31;54(3):433-51 [PMID: 11922957]
  23. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Dec;15(6):819-26 [PMID: 11800526]
  24. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007 Oct;35(10):1956-62 [PMID: 17600084]
  25. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1987 Feb;12(2):136-44 [PMID: 3829560]
  26. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;52(10):977-82 [PMID: 10513761]
  27. J Pharm Sci. 2005 Jun;94(6):1237-48 [PMID: 15858851]
  28. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2011;18(3):e523-7 [PMID: 22113390]
  29. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1980 Feb;212(2):264-8 [PMID: 7351638]
  30. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2013;76(1):25-57 [PMID: 23151209]
  31. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011 Feb;50(2):81-98 [PMID: 21241070]
  32. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002 May;301(2):594-8 [PMID: 11961061]
  33. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Oct;59(7):545-52 [PMID: 12955371]
  34. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007 Jul 15;74(2):359-71 [PMID: 17509534]
  35. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;24(4):521-4 [PMID: 6861867]
  36. J Pharm Sci. 1983 Oct;72(10):1137-41 [PMID: 6644558]
  37. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008 Jul;18(7):637-45 [PMID: 18551044]
  38. HIV Med. 2012 Apr;13(4):226-35 [PMID: 22129166]
  39. Semin Perinatol. 2001 Jun;25(3):196-201 [PMID: 11453617]
  40. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1991;5(7):567-82 [PMID: 1778535]
  41. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1983 Jul;16(1):109-11 [PMID: 6882618]
  42. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;192(2):633-9 [PMID: 15696014]
  43. Kidney Int. 1980 Aug;18(2):152-61 [PMID: 7003196]
  44. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1979 Apr;7(2):127-45 [PMID: 20218010]
  45. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994 Apr 29;47(9):1643-53 [PMID: 8185679]
  46. BJOG. 2010 Jun;117(7):837-44 [PMID: 20353457]
  47. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:783528 [PMID: 21785566]
  48. Curr Drug Targets. 2006 Jul;7(7):893-909 [PMID: 16842220]
  49. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2005 Oct;20(5):379-86 [PMID: 16272756]
  50. Mol Pharm. 2008 Sep-Oct;5(5):760-75 [PMID: 18547054]
  51. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1997 Jul;53(3):201-24 [PMID: 9230455]
  52. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Sep;287(3):E472-9 [PMID: 15113705]
  53. Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Apr;88(2):391-401, vii [PMID: 18381119]
  54. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(10):883-908 [PMID: 12885263]
  55. J Pharm Sci. 2008 Dec;97(12):5401-10 [PMID: 18351632]
  56. Kidney Int. 1985 Jan;27(1):74-9 [PMID: 3884881]
  57. Am J Physiol. 1989 Apr;256(4 Pt 2):H1060-5 [PMID: 2705548]
  58. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Nov;84(5):559-62 [PMID: 18401339]
  59. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007 Oct;35(10):1766-80 [PMID: 17620347]
  60. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Oct;62(4):400-7 [PMID: 9357391]
  61. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Nov;33(5):328-43 [PMID: 9391746]
  62. J Clin Invest. 1995 Oct;96(4):1698-705 [PMID: 7560060]
  63. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994 Oct;271(1):557-66 [PMID: 7965756]
  64. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2003;33(2):137-211 [PMID: 12708613]
  65. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug;84(2):248-53 [PMID: 18288078]
  66. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Jun;69(6):1567-82 [PMID: 22526410]
  67. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976 Sep;20(3):253-9 [PMID: 954346]
  68. J Pharm Sci. 2011 Oct;100(10):4127-57 [PMID: 21541937]
  69. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011;51:45-73 [PMID: 20854171]
  70. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012 Jun 1;51(6):365-96 [PMID: 22515555]

MeSH Term

Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A
Female
Forecasting
Humans
Kidney
Metabolic Clearance Rate
Models, Biological
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Pregnancy
Tissue Distribution

Chemicals

Pharmaceutical Preparations
CYP3A protein, human
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PBPKpregnantwomenchangesexposuremodelPKpharmacokineticsdatapregnancydrug'smaypotentialsystemicbasedmodelsusedclinicalwhole-bodycanphysiologicaldrugienonpregnantPPAUCCmaxpredictionsimplifiedcompoundsrenallymetabolizedalteredhenceanticipationhighlydesirablePhysiologicallyrecentlyinfluencetrialdesignfacilitateregulatoryinteractionsIdeallypredictmajorimpactclearancekidneyliverdistributionadiposefetoplacentalunitdescribedsimplereadilyimplementablemultitissue/organkeypregnancy-relatedparameterscharacterizereferencedrugsmetformindigoxinmidazolamemtricitabinecomparedpostpartumPhysiologicalrelatedmaternalbodyweighttissuevolumecardiacoutputrenalfunctionbloodflowscytochromeP450activitycollectedliteratureincorporatedstructuraldescribesHVSubsequentlyareacurvemaximumconcentrationsimulatedModel-simulatedprofilesoverallagreementobservedfolderrorratiovsless13-foldindicatingusefulutilizationdevelopmentaiddesigningstudiesidentifypriorimainlyeliminatedCYP3A4modelingapproachfourprimarilyexcretedCYP3A

Similar Articles

Cited By