Too few, too weak: conflict of interest policies at Canadian medical schools.

Adrienne Shnier, Joel Lexchin, Barbara Mintzes, Annemarie Jutel, Kelly Holloway
Author Information
  1. Adrienne Shnier: Health Policy and Equity, School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The education of medical students should be based on the best clinical information available, rather than on commercial interests. Previous research looking at university-wide conflict of interest (COI) policies used in Canadian medical schools has shown very poor regulation. An analysis of COI policies was undertaken to document the current policy environment in all 17 Canadian medical schools.
METHODS: A web search was used to initially locate COI policies supplemented by additional information from the deans of each medical school. Strength of policies was rated on a scale of 0 to 2 in 12 categories and also on the presence of enforcement measures. For each school, we report scores for all 12 categories, enforcement measures, and summative scores.
RESULTS: COI policies received summative scores that ranged from 0 to 19, with 0 the lowest possible score obtainable and 24 the maximum. The highest mean scores per category were for disclosure and ghostwriting (0.9) and for gifts and scholarships (0.8).
DISCUSSION: This study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of all 17 Canadian medical school-specific COI policies. Our results suggest that the COI policy environment at Canadian medical schools is generally permissive. Policy development is a dynamic process. We therefore encourage all Canadian medical schools to develop restrictive COI policies to ensure that their medical students are educated based on the best clinical evidence available, free of industry biases and COI relationships that may influence the future medical thinking and prescribing practices of medical students in Canada once they graduate.

References

  1. JAMA. 2000 Nov 1;284(17):2203-8 [PMID: 11056591]
  2. Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 11;169(9):887-93 [PMID: 19433701]
  3. JAMA. 2010 Nov 24;304(20):2294-5 [PMID: 21098775]
  4. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):665-71 [PMID: 18270355]
  5. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec;28(6):1814-25 [PMID: 19887423]
  6. BMJ. 2013 Jan 30;346:f264 [PMID: 23372175]
  7. JAMA. 2005 Sep 7;294(9):1034-42 [PMID: 16145023]
  8. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Mar;27(3):274-9 [PMID: 21671130]
  9. PLoS Med. 2010 Aug;8(8):e1001070 [PMID: 21829331]
  10. JAMA. 2001 Oct 24-31;286(16):1994-9 [PMID: 11667936]
  11. CMAJ. 2002 Feb 19;166(4):453-6 [PMID: 11873924]
  12. Med J Aust. 2011 Feb 7;194(3):121-5 [PMID: 21299485]
  13. CMAJ. 2011 Mar 8;183(4):463 [PMID: 21398254]
  14. Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):293-9 [PMID: 21248603]
  15. CMAJ. 2010 Sep 7;182(12):1279 [PMID: 20457768]
  16. Am J Med. 2005 Aug;118(8):881-4 [PMID: 16084181]
  17. PLoS Med. 2011 May;8(5):e1001037 [PMID: 21629685]
  18. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 21;360(21):2160-3 [PMID: 19403898]
  19. PLoS Med. 2010 Oct 19;7(10):e1000352 [PMID: 20976098]
  20. Med Care. 2013 Feb;51(2):199-203 [PMID: 23142772]

MeSH Term

Canada
Conflict of Interest
Disclosure
Fellowships and Scholarships
Gift Giving
Humans
Organizational Policy
Policy Making
Research Design
Schools, Medical

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0medicalCOIpoliciesCanadianschools0scoresstudentsbasedbestclinicalinformationavailableconflictinterestusedpolicyenvironment17school12categoriesenforcementmeasuressummativeINTRODUCTION:educationrathercommercialinterestsPreviousresearchlookinguniversity-wideshownpoorregulationanalysisundertakendocumentcurrentMETHODS:websearchinitiallylocatesupplementedadditionaldeansStrengthratedscale2alsopresencereportRESULTS:receivedranged19lowestpossiblescoreobtainable24maximumhighestmeanpercategorydisclosureghostwriting9giftsscholarships8DISCUSSION:studyprovidesfirstcomprehensiveevaluationschool-specificresultssuggestgenerallypermissivePolicydevelopmentdynamicprocessthereforeencouragedeveloprestrictiveensureeducatedevidencefreeindustrybiasesrelationshipsmayinfluencefuturethinkingprescribingpracticesCanadagraduateweak:

Similar Articles

Cited By