Short-term memory, working memory, and syntactic comprehension in aphasia.

David Caplan, Jennifer Michaud, Rebecca Hufford
Author Information
  1. David Caplan: Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. dcaplan@partners.org

Abstract

Sixty-one people with aphasia were tested on 10 tests of short-term memory (STM) and for the ability to use syntactic structure to determine the meanings of 11 types of sentences in three tasks-object manipulation, picture matching, and picture matching with self-paced listening. Multilevel models showed relationships between measures of the ability to retain and manipulate item and order information in STM and accuracy and reaction time (RT), and a greater relationship between these STM measures and accuracy and RT for several more complex sentence types in individual tasks. There were no effects of measures of STM that reflect the use of phonological codes or rehearsal on comprehension. There was only one effect of STM measures on self-paced listening times. There were double dissociations between performance on STM and individual comprehension tasks, indicating that normal STM is not necessary to perform normally on these tasks. The results are most easily related to the view that STM plays a facilitatory role in supporting the use of the products of the comprehension process to accomplish operations related to tasks.

References

  1. Psychol Rev. 1996 Oct;103(4):761-72 [PMID: 8888653]
  2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):544-9 [PMID: 11082863]
  3. Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):403-13 [PMID: 15952262]
  4. Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):717-51 [PMID: 19839682]
  5. Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):439-50 [PMID: 21480714]
  6. Brain Lang. 1994 Feb;46(2):329-49 [PMID: 8137148]
  7. Cogn Sci. 2005 May 6;29(3):375-419 [PMID: 21702779]
  8. Brain Lang. 1994 Nov;47(4):609-60 [PMID: 7859057]
  9. Psychol Rev. 1980 Jul;87(4):329-54 [PMID: 7413885]
  10. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1322-37 [PMID: 15521807]
  11. Psychol Aging. 2004 Dec;19(4):601-16 [PMID: 15584786]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Jul 1;2(7):240-7 [PMID: 21244922]
  13. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):17-36 [PMID: 20053042]
  14. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Feb;53(1):1-22 [PMID: 10718061]
  15. J Mem Lang. 2011 Aug 1;65(2):193-207 [PMID: 21743771]
  16. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):77-94; discussion 95-126 [PMID: 11301522]
  17. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jun;11(6):236-42 [PMID: 17475538]
  18. Cogn Psychol. 1992 Jan;24(1):56-98 [PMID: 1537232]
  19. J Psycholinguist Res. 1997 Jul;26(4):377-400 [PMID: 9232007]
  20. Am J Psychol. 1982 Fall;95(3):409-19 [PMID: 7180948]
  21. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):88-95 [PMID: 12747494]
  22. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Nov;56(8):1289-300; discussion 1301-6 [PMID: 14578085]
  23. Mem Cognit. 1993 Mar;21(2):176-83 [PMID: 8469126]
  24. Cortex. 2003 Apr;39(2):357-70 [PMID: 12784893]
  25. Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):76-82 [PMID: 15010239]
  26. Mem Cognit. 2011 Oct;39(7):1198-210 [PMID: 21461875]
  27. Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):231-70 [PMID: 15037131]
  28. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Oct;4(10):829-39 [PMID: 14523382]
  29. J Psycholinguist Res. 1996 Jan;25(1):93-115 [PMID: 8789368]
  30. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1986 Nov;38(4):603-18 [PMID: 3809575]
  31. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423 [PMID: 11058819]
  32. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):243-68 [PMID: 23319178]
  33. Brain Lang. 1999 May;67(3):202-27 [PMID: 10210631]
  34. J Psycholinguist Res. 1996 Mar;25(2):273-90 [PMID: 8667299]
  35. Psychol Rev. 2000 Jan;107(1):127-81 [PMID: 10687405]
  36. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):53-9 [PMID: 15668097]
  37. J Psycholinguist Res. 2004 Nov;33(6):493-516 [PMID: 15614991]
  38. J Psycholinguist Res. 2000 Mar;29(2):111-23 [PMID: 10709178]
  39. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):539-76 [PMID: 17638496]
  40. Am Psychol. 2001 Nov;56(11):851-64 [PMID: 11785152]
  41. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1997 Nov;50(4):899-923 [PMID: 9450382]
  42. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 [PMID: 11515286]
  43. Brain. 1996 Jun;119 ( Pt 3):933-49 [PMID: 8673503]
  44. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1996 Feb;49(1):51-75 [PMID: 8920099]
  45. Psychol Aging. 1990 Mar;5(1):68-78 [PMID: 2317303]
  46. Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):372-9 [PMID: 15948623]
  47. Cognition. 1985 Nov;21(2):117-75 [PMID: 2419022]
  48. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jun 22;96(13):7592-7 [PMID: 10377460]
  49. Brain. 1991 Dec;114 ( Pt 6):2521-42 [PMID: 1782529]
  50. Psychol Aging. 2001 Mar;16(1):128-44 [PMID: 11302362]
  51. Exp Aging Res. 2000 Oct-Dec;26(4):315-22 [PMID: 11091938]
  52. Brain Lang. 2007 May;101(2):103-50 [PMID: 16999989]
  53. Brain Lang. 2003 Feb;84(2):189-203 [PMID: 12590911]
  54. Brain Lang. 2003 Feb;84(2):222-49 [PMID: 12590913]
  55. Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):122-49 [PMID: 1546114]
  56. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Jan;57(1):129-63 [PMID: 14681007]
  57. J Mem Lang. 2011 Oct 1;65(3):247-263 [PMID: 21927535]
  58. Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):211-45 [PMID: 7740089]
  59. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 Aug;45(2):177-92 [PMID: 1410554]
  60. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2007 May;24(3):292-311 [PMID: 18416493]
  61. Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jul;36(2):73-137 [PMID: 9721198]
  62. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Dec;26(8):685-704 [PMID: 20401770]
  63. Psychol Aging. 1997 Jun;12(2):362-71 [PMID: 9189996]
  64. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Jan;58(1):134-54 [PMID: 15881295]
  65. Psychol Rev. 1998 Oct;105(4):761-81 [PMID: 9830378]
  66. Aphasiology. 2012 Jan 1;26(3-4): [PMID: 24347786]
  67. J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446 [PMID: 19884961]
  68. Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 14;2:369 [PMID: 22174705]
  69. Brain Lang. 1981 Nov;14(2):235-71 [PMID: 7306783]

Grants

  1. R01 DC000942/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. DC00942/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aphasia
Case-Control Studies
Comprehension
Female
Humans
Language
Learning
Linguistics
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Photic Stimulation
Reaction Time