Public beliefs about the causes of obesity and attitudes towards policy initiatives in Great Britain.

Rebecca J Beeken, Jane Wardle
Author Information
  1. Rebecca J Beeken: Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess attributions for overweight and the level of support for policy initiatives in Great Britain.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional. Respondents indicated their agreement (5-point scales: strongly disagree to strongly agree) to three potential causes of overweight (environment, genes, willpower) and five policies (free weight-loss treatment, taxing unhealthy foods, healthy lifestyle campaigns, food labelling, advertising restrictions).
SETTING: Data were collected as part of a computer-assisted, face-to-face Omnibus survey of adults (aged >15 years) from across Great Britain in April 2012 carried out by a market research company.
SUBJECTS: A population-representative sample of British adults (n 1986).
RESULTS: More people attributed overweight to the food environment (61 %) and lack of willpower (57 %) than to genes (45 %). Policy support was highest for healthy lifestyle campaigns (71 %) and food labelling (66 %), and lowest for taxing unhealthy foods (32 %). Food environment attributions were associated with higher support for all policies (P < 0·001). Genetic attributions were associated with higher support for free weight-loss treatments and healthy lifestyle campaigns (P < 0·001), but not other policies. Attributions to lack of willpower were not associated differentially with support for any policies (P > 0·01).
CONCLUSIONS: Belief that overweight is caused by the food environment or genes – both seen as outside individual control – was associated with greater support for government policies to prevent and treat obesity. Improving awareness of the multiple causes of obesity could facilitate acceptance of policy action to reduce obesity prevalence.

References

  1. Health Promot J Austr. 2012 Aug;23(2):86-91 [PMID: 23088483]
  2. Obes Rev. 2013 Feb;14(2):110-28 [PMID: 23174017]
  3. Milbank Q. 2009 Mar;87(1):7-47 [PMID: 19298414]
  4. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Jul;16(7):1529-34 [PMID: 18464749]
  5. Health Commun. 2012;27(4):389-98 [PMID: 21978090]
  6. Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):741 [PMID: 21872731]
  7. J Public Health Policy. 2011 Nov;32(4):430-44 [PMID: 21881614]
  8. Lancet. 2010 Dec 11;376(9757):1959 [PMID: 21146089]
  9. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Oct;30(5):923-54 [PMID: 16477792]
  10. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Jul;13(3):158-66 [PMID: 18573765]
  11. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39325 [PMID: 22723996]
  12. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Aug;19(8):1580-5 [PMID: 21512511]
  13. Am J Public Health. 2010 Jun;100(6):1019-28 [PMID: 20075322]
  14. Obes Rev. 2007 Sep;8(5):467-73 [PMID: 17716304]
  15. J Health Commun. 2011 Oct;16(9):976-87 [PMID: 21541876]
  16. BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 23;11:661 [PMID: 21859493]
  17. Obes Facts. 2010 Feb;3(1):41-6 [PMID: 20215794]
  18. BMJ. 2011 Apr 13;342:d2177 [PMID: 21493668]
  19. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Jun;37(6):774-82 [PMID: 22964792]
  20. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:355-75 [PMID: 11274526]
  21. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Jan;20(1):147-50 [PMID: 21760637]
  22. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Jul;61(7):585-90 [PMID: 17568049]
  23. J Health Commun. 2007 Jun;12(4):359-76 [PMID: 17558788]

Grants

  1. 14133/Cancer Research UK
  2. C1418/A7974/Cancer Research UK

MeSH Term

Adult
Attitude to Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
Culture
Data Collection
Diet
Environment
Female
Food Labeling
Food Supply
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Health Behavior
Health Policy
Health Promotion
Humans
Life Style
Male
Middle Aged
Obesity
Public Opinion
Social Control, Informal
Taxes
Weight Reduction Programs

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0support%policiesoverweightenvironmentfoodassociatedobesityattributionspolicyGreatBritaincausesgeneswillpowerhealthylifestylecampaignsPinitiativesstronglyfreeweight-losstaxingunhealthyfoodslabellingadultslackhigher<0·001OBJECTIVE:assesslevelDESIGN:Cross-sectionalRespondentsindicatedagreement5-pointscales:disagreeagreethreepotentialfivetreatmentadvertisingrestrictionsSETTING:Datacollectedpartcomputer-assistedface-to-faceOmnibussurveyaged>15yearsacrossApril2012carriedmarketresearchcompanySUBJECTS:population-representativesampleBritishn1986RESULTS:peopleattributed615745Policyhighest7166lowest32FoodGenetictreatmentsAttributionsdifferentially>0·01CONCLUSIONS:BeliefcausedseenoutsideindividualcontrolgreatergovernmentpreventtreatImprovingawarenessmultiplefacilitateacceptanceactionreduceprevalencePublicbeliefsattitudestowards

Similar Articles

Cited By