Tracking the first two seconds: three stages of visual information processing?

Jane Jacob, Bruno G Breitmeyer, Melissa Treviño
Author Information
  1. Jane Jacob: Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204-5022, USA, jjacob9@uh.edu.

Abstract

We compared visual priming and comparison tasks to assess information processing of a stimulus during the first 2 s after its onset. In both tasks, a 13-ms prime was followed at varying SOAs by a 40-ms probe. In the priming task, observers identified the probe as rapidly and accurately as possible; in the comparison task, observers determined as rapidly and accurately as possible whether or not the probe and prime were identical. Priming effects attained a maximum at an SOA of 133 ms and then declined monotonically to zero by 700 ms, indicating reliance on relatively brief visuosensory (iconic) memory. In contrast, the comparison effects yielded a multiphasic function, showing a maximum at 0 ms followed by a minimum at 133 ms, followed in turn by a maximum at 240 ms and another minimum at 720 ms, and finally a third maximum at 1,200 ms before declining thereafter. The results indicate three stages of prime processing that we take to correspond to iconic visible persistence, iconic informational persistence, and visual working memory, with the first two used in the priming task and all three in the comparison task. These stages are related to stages presumed to underlie stimulus processing in other tasks, such as those giving rise to the attentional blink.

References

  1. Psychol Bull. 1985 Nov;98(3):419-56 [PMID: 4080894]
  2. Hum Factors. 1963 Feb;5:19-31 [PMID: 13990068]
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Feb;36(1):74-87 [PMID: 20121296]
  4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):514-20 [PMID: 12412891]
  5. Nature. 1977 May 19;267(5608):241-3 [PMID: 865614]
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Dec;38(6):1448-64 [PMID: 22428668]
  7. Nature. 1998 Oct 8;395(6702):597-600 [PMID: 9783584]
  8. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Mar;109(1):75-97 [PMID: 6445405]
  9. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):488-505 [PMID: 21604913]
  10. Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15;63(3):1393-403 [PMID: 22922368]
  11. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Feb;21(1):109-27 [PMID: 7707027]
  12. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun;39(3):745-56 [PMID: 23046142]
  13. Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jul;151(2):272-88 [PMID: 12739092]
  14. Science. 1967 Oct 6;158(3797):137-9 [PMID: 6054814]
  15. J Vis. 2009 Aug 31;9(9):18.1-14 [PMID: 19761351]
  16. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):647-53 [PMID: 16447377]
  17. Conscious Cogn. 2004 Mar;13(1):138-57 [PMID: 14990249]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):6275-80 [PMID: 12719543]
  19. Nature. 1994 May 26;369(6478):313-5 [PMID: 8183369]
  20. Percept Psychophys. 1980 Mar;27(3):183-228 [PMID: 6992093]
  21. Percept Psychophys. 2005 Feb;67(2):285-300 [PMID: 15971692]
  22. Psychol Rev. 1967 Sep;74(5):392-409 [PMID: 6076470]
  23. Trends Neurosci. 2004 Mar;27(3):161-8 [PMID: 15036882]
  24. Neuropsychologia. 2008 Feb 12;46(3):774-85 [PMID: 18037456]
  25. J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 21;32(47):16716-24 [PMID: 23175825]

MeSH Term

Humans
Memory, Short-Term
Reaction Time
Repetition Priming
Time Factors
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0comparisontaskmaximumstagesvisualprimingtasksprocessingfirstprimefollowedprobeiconicthreeinformationstimulusobserversrapidlyaccuratelypossibleeffects133 msmemoryminimumpersistencetwocomparedassess2 sonset13-msvaryingSOAs40-msidentifieddeterminedwhetheridenticalPrimingattainedSOAdeclinedmonotonicallyzero700 msindicatingreliancerelativelybriefvisuosensorycontrastyieldedmultiphasicfunctionshowing0 msturn240 msanother720 msfinallythird1200 msdecliningthereafterresultsindicatetakecorrespondvisibleinformationalworkingusedrelatedpresumedunderliegivingriseattentionalblinkTrackingseconds:processing?

Similar Articles

Cited By