Efficacy to effectiveness transition of an Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening (EPICS): study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Selina A Smith, Daniel S Blumenthal
Author Information
  1. Selina A Smith: Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. ssmith@msm.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: African Americans have the highest incidence and mortality and are less likely than whites to have been screened for colorectal cancer (CRC). Many interventions have been shown to increase CRC screening in research settings, but few have been evaluated specifically for use in African-American communities in real world settings. This study aims to identify the most efficacious approach to disseminate an evidence-based intervention in promoting colorectal screening in African Americans and to identify the factors associated with its efficacy.
METHODS/DESIGN: In this study, investigators will recruit 20 community coalitions and 7,200 African-Americans age 50 to 74 to test passive and active approaches to disseminating the Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening (EPICS); to measure the extent to which EPICS is accepted and the fidelity of implementation in various settings and to estimate the potential translatability and public health impact of EPICS. This four-arm cluster randomized trial compares the following implementation strategies: passive arms, (web access to facilitator training materials and toolkits without technical assistance (TA) and (web access, but with technical assistance (TA); active arms, (in-person access to facilitator training materials and toolkits without TA and (in-person access with TA). Primary outcome measures are the reach (the proportion of representative community coalitions and individuals participating) and efficacy (post-intervention changes in CRC screening rates). Secondary outcomes include adoption (percentage of community coalitions implementing the EPICS sessions) and implementation (quality and consistency of the intervention delivery). The extent to which community coalitions continue to implement EPICS post-implementation (maintenance) will also be measured. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted.
DISCUSSION: Implementing EPICS in partnership with community coalitions, we hypothesized, will result in more rapid adoption than traditional top-down approaches, and resulting changes in community CRC screening practices are more likely to be sustainable over time. With its national reach, this study has the potential to enhance our understanding of barriers and enablers to the uptake of educational programs aimed at eliminating cancer disparities.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01805622.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01805622

References

  1. Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5 Suppl):1239-50 [PMID: 15316911]
  2. Prev Med. 2006 Dec;43(6):482-7 [PMID: 16920184]
  3. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 04;11:3 [PMID: 21205290]
  4. Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Oct;5(5):412-5 [PMID: 23067354]
  5. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):465-8 [PMID: 9703533]
  6. Health Educ Res. 2006 Oct;21(5):688-94 [PMID: 16945984]
  7. BMC Pediatr. 2010 Nov 23;10:86 [PMID: 21092316]
  8. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):936-41 [PMID: 17967955]
  9. J Occup Environ Med. 2012 May;54(5):610-4 [PMID: 22476113]
  10. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:2 [PMID: 11336663]
  11. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92 [PMID: 10982317]
  12. Am J Manag Care. 2006 Mar;12(3):137-45 [PMID: 16524346]
  13. Cancer. 2010 Feb 15;116(4):922-9 [PMID: 20052732]
  14. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A87 [PMID: 17875262]
  15. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202 [PMID: 9611617]
  16. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Nov;23(4 Suppl):77-87 [PMID: 23124502]

Grants

  1. U54 CA118638/NCI NIH HHS
  2. G12 MD007585/NIMHD NIH HHS
  3. UL1 TR000454/NCATS NIH HHS
  4. 1R01CA166785-01/NCI NIH HHS
  5. U54 CA118623/NCI NIH HHS
  6. 5U54CA118638-07/NCI NIH HHS
  7. U54 CA118948/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Black or African American
Aged
Cluster Analysis
Colorectal Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Health Promotion
Health Status Disparities
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Education as Topic
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EPICScommunitycoalitionsCRCscreeningstudywillaccessTAsettingsimplementationAfricanAmericanslikelycolorectalcanceridentifyinterventionefficacypassiveactiveapproachesEducationalProgramIncreaseColorectalCancerScreeningextentpotentialclusterrandomizedtrialarmswebfacilitatortrainingmaterialstoolkitswithouttechnicalassistancein-personreachchangesadoptionBACKGROUND:highestincidencemortalitylesswhitesscreenedManyinterventionsshownincreaseresearchevaluatedspecificallyuseAfrican-Americancommunitiesrealworldaimsefficaciousapproachdisseminateevidence-basedpromotingfactorsassociatedMETHODS/DESIGN:investigatorsrecruit207200African-Americansage5074testdisseminatingmeasureacceptedfidelityvariousestimatetranslatabilitypublichealthimpactfour-armcomparesfollowingstrategies:Primaryoutcomemeasuresproportionrepresentativeindividualsparticipatingpost-interventionratesSecondaryoutcomesincludepercentageimplementingsessionsqualityconsistencydeliverycontinueimplementpost-implementationmaintenancealsomeasuredCost-effectivenessanalysisconductedDISCUSSION:Implementingpartnershiphypothesizedresultrapidtraditionaltop-downresultingpracticessustainabletimenationalenhanceunderstandingbarriersenablersuptakeeducationalprogramsaimedeliminatingdisparitiesTRIALREGISTRATION:http://wwwClinicalTrialsgovNCT01805622Efficacyeffectivenesstransition:protocolcontrolled

Similar Articles

Cited By