Genetic architecture of survival and fitness-related traits in two populations of Atlantic salmon.

A Ls Houde, C C Wilson, B D Neff
Author Information
  1. A Ls Houde: Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

The additive genetic effects of traits can be used to predict evolutionary trajectories, such as responses to selection. Non-additive genetic and maternal environmental effects can also change evolutionary trajectories and influence phenotypes, but these effects have received less attention by researchers. We partitioned the phenotypic variance of survival and fitness-related traits into additive genetic, non-additive genetic and maternal environmental effects using a full-factorial breeding design within two allopatric populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Maternal environmental effects were large at early life stages, but decreased during development, with non-additive genetic effects being most significant at later juvenile stages (alevin and fry). Non-additive genetic effects were also, on average, larger than additive genetic effects. The populations, generally, did not differ in the trait values or inferred genetic architecture of the traits. Any differences between the populations for trait values could be explained by maternal environmental effects. We discuss whether the similarities in architectures of these populations is the result of natural selection across a common juvenile environment.

References

  1. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Oct 1;13(10):403-7 [PMID: 21238360]
  2. J Theor Biol. 2008 Sep 7;254(1):147-55 [PMID: 18589454]
  3. Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Jul;5(7):228-30 [PMID: 21232361]
  4. Am Nat. 2009 Nov;174(5):741-52 [PMID: 19772439]
  5. Nat Genet. 2010 Mar;42(3):260-3 [PMID: 20101244]
  6. Evolution. 1983 Sep;37(5):895-905 [PMID: 28563537]
  7. Mol Ecol. 2006 Aug;15(9):2357-65 [PMID: 16842411]
  8. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):546-50 [PMID: 21565055]
  9. Am Nat. 2004 Jun;163(6):809-22 [PMID: 15266380]
  10. Mol Biol Evol. 2004 May;21(5):945-56 [PMID: 15014172]
  11. Nature. 2002 Oct 24;419(6909):826-30 [PMID: 12397355]
  12. Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Sep;83 ( Pt 3):260-70 [PMID: 10504423]
  13. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Feb 1;16(2):95-100 [PMID: 11165708]
  14. Evolution. 2006 Oct;60(10):1981-90 [PMID: 17133855]
  15. Evolution. 1993 Jun;47(3):949-957 [PMID: 28567906]
  16. J Evol Biol. 2010 Apr;23(4):687-98 [PMID: 20102438]
  17. Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):586-9 [PMID: 17148295]
  18. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):173-211 [PMID: 17437557]
  19. Am Nat. 2006 Jan;167(1):E23-38 [PMID: 16475094]
  20. J Exp Biol. 2011 Oct 1;214(Pt 19):3269-78 [PMID: 21900474]

MeSH Term

Animals
Biological Evolution
Female
Male
Phenotype
Quantitative Trait, Heritable
Salmo salar
Selection, Genetic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0effectsgeneticpopulationstraitsenvironmentaladditivematernalcanevolutionarytrajectoriesselectionNon-additivealsosurvivalfitness-relatednon-additivetwoAtlanticsalmonstagesjuveniletraitvaluesarchitectureusedpredictresponseschangeinfluencephenotypesreceivedlessattentionresearcherspartitionedphenotypicvarianceusingfull-factorialbreedingdesignwithinallopatricSalmosalarMaternallargeearlylifedecreaseddevelopmentsignificantlateralevinfryaveragelargergenerallydifferinferreddifferencesexplaineddiscusswhethersimilaritiesarchitecturesresultnaturalacrosscommonenvironmentGenetic

Similar Articles

Cited By