A conceptual framework for improving well-being in people with a diagnosis of psychosis.

B Schrank, S Riches, V Bird, J Murray, A Tylee, M Slade
Author Information
  1. B Schrank: Health Service and Population Research Department,King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry,London,UK.
  2. S Riches: Health Service and Population Research Department,King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry,London,UK.
  3. V Bird: Health Service and Population Research Department,King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry,London,UK.
  4. J Murray: Health Service and Population Research Department,King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry,London,UK.
  5. A Tylee: Health Service and Population Research Department,King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry,London,UK.
  6. M Slade: Health Service and Population Research Department,King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry,London,UK.

Abstract

Background. Well-being is important for people with severe mental illness, such as psychosis. So far, no clear concept of well-being exists for this client group. A recent systematic review and narrative synthesis developed a static framework of well-being components. The present study aims to validate the static framework and to illuminate the processes by which well-being is experienced by people with psychosis. Methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 service users with psychosis exploring their experience of well-being. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data employing techniques taken from grounded theory to enhance the rigour of the analysis. Respondent validation was undertaken with 13 of the 23 participants. Results. Three superordinate categories of well-being were identified: current sense of self; transition to enhanced sense of self and enhanced sense of self. In the dynamic process of improving well-being the current sense of self undergoes a transition to an enhanced sense of self. The four factors influencing the transition are consistent with the static framework of well-being, hence validating the static framework. In addition, we identified three determinants of current sense of self and seven indicators of enhanced sense of self, which represent the achievement of improved well-being. Conclusions. This study provides an empirically defensible framework for understanding well-being in terms of determinants, influences and indicators. The influences are targets for interventions to improve well-being, and the indicators are outcome domains to assess the effectiveness of services in supporting well-being.

References

  1. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2007 Jan-Mar;16(1):10-5 [PMID: 17427599]
  2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 26;10:26 [PMID: 20102609]
  3. Int J Behav Med. 2014 Apr;21(2):230-9 [PMID: 23436184]
  4. BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 10;12:758 [PMID: 22963588]
  5. Trials. 2012 Jul 24;13:115 [PMID: 22827885]
  6. Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Dec;62(12):1470-6 [PMID: 22193795]
  7. Am Psychol. 2013 Apr;68(3):124-33 [PMID: 23586488]
  8. Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Jan;57(1):120-2 [PMID: 16399972]
  9. Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52 [PMID: 22130746]
  10. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Mar 04;13:80 [PMID: 23452404]
  11. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Mar;31(2):236-48 [PMID: 20447745]
  12. Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(1):4-10 [PMID: 23452097]
  13. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Apr;27(4):291-8 [PMID: 22843353]
  14. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 25;14(3):e63 [PMID: 22732765]
  15. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Dec;21(4):371-9 [PMID: 22794790]
  16. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;22(1):55-60 [PMID: 19122536]
  17. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215 [PMID: 847061]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;92:9-21 [PMID: 23849274]
  19. BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 23;11:185 [PMID: 22112008]
  20. AIDS Behav. 2013 Jun;17(5):1785-95 [PMID: 23456594]
  21. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Dec;22(4):363-74 [PMID: 23445538]
  22. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011 Dec;20(4):303-5 [PMID: 22201206]
  23. Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jul;63(7):702-4 [PMID: 22752033]
  24. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Mar;22(1):47-62 [PMID: 22794315]
  25. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;204:256-61 [PMID: 24692752]
  26. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2010 Jan-Mar;19(1):63-71 [PMID: 20486425]
  27. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011 Mar;20(1):29-31 [PMID: 21657112]
  28. J Clin Psychol. 2012 May;68(5):490-501 [PMID: 22498950]
  29. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2012 Jan;40(1):105-9 [PMID: 21902854]
  30. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Jun;22(2):147-50 [PMID: 23098565]
  31. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Dec;21(4):367-9 [PMID: 22794112]
  32. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Dec;21(4):353-64 [PMID: 22794507]
  33. Science. 2012 Sep 21;337(6101):1505-10 [PMID: 22997331]
  34. Rehabil Psychol. 2013 Feb;58(1):1-9 [PMID: 23437995]
  35. Soc Work Public Health. 2012;27(5):441-68 [PMID: 22873935]
  36. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004 Winter;27(3):205 [PMID: 14982325]
  37. Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(3):185-202 [PMID: 22074317]
  38. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Jun;22(2):131-46 [PMID: 22831843]
  39. Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):172-5 [PMID: 11934003]
  40. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2013 Mar;22(1):21-8 [PMID: 23114056]
  41. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Mar;21(1):27-9 [PMID: 22670409]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0well-beingsenseselfframeworkpsychosisstaticenhancedpeoplecurrenttransitionindicatorsstudy23analysisimprovingdeterminantsinfluencesBackgroundWell-beingimportantseverementalillnessfarclearconceptexistsclientgrouprecentsystematicreviewnarrativesynthesisdevelopedcomponentspresentaimsvalidateilluminateprocessesexperiencedMethodsSemi-structuredinterviewsconductedserviceusersexploringexperienceThematicusedanalysedataemployingtechniquestakengroundedtheoryenhancerigourRespondentvalidationundertaken13participantsResultsThreesuperordinatecategoriesidentified:dynamicprocessundergoesfourfactorsinfluencingconsistenthencevalidatingadditionidentifiedthreesevenrepresentachievementimprovedConclusionsprovidesempiricallydefensibleunderstandingtermstargetsinterventionsimproveoutcomedomainsassesseffectivenessservicessupportingconceptualdiagnosis

Similar Articles

Cited By