Patient knowledge and beliefs as barriers to extending cervical cancer screening intervals in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Nikki A Hawkins, Vicki B Benard, April Greek, Katherine B Roland, Diane Manninen, Mona Saraiya
Author Information
  1. Nikki A Hawkins: CDC, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: nhawkins@cdc.gov.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite guidelines recommending Cervical Cancer screening intervals be extended beyond one year, clinical practice has been slow to change. Patient preferences are a potential barrier. In the Centers for Disease Control's Cervical Cancer (Cx3) Study at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) across Illinois, we surveyed patients about screening practices, and assessed beliefs regarding lengthening screening intervals.
METHOD: We analyzed data from 984 low income women in the Cx3 Study (2009-2011). Participants completed a survey assessing health history, knowledge about Pap testing, beliefs and intentions about extending screening intervals, and demographics.
RESULTS: The majority reported annual Pap testing (61%), while only 24% reported a 2-3 year screening interval (recommendation at time of survey). Misunderstandings about the Pap test were prevalent, with over half believing it screened for vaginal, yeast, and sexually transmitted infections (58%-72%). Unfavorable beliefs about extending screening intervals were common. The majority (57%) indicated that they would not wait 3 years to be screened if their physician recommended it, and intentions were associated with knowledge about Pap testing.
CONCLUSION: Most women reported annual Cervical Cancer screening, and intended to resist longer screening intervals. patients' lack of knowledge and unfavorable beliefs may serve as barriers to extending screening intervals.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Nov;83(2):237-47 [PMID: 14631934]
  2. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Apr;20(4):511-5 [PMID: 21443450]
  3. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):977-85 [PMID: 20548011]
  4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):447.e1-8 [PMID: 21840492]
  5. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 3;151(9):602-11 [PMID: 19884621]
  6. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Nov-Dec;52(6):342-62 [PMID: 12469763]
  7. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):243-50 [PMID: 15009779]
  8. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Oct;20(10):1479-84 [PMID: 21774673]
  9. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Apr;137(4):516-42 [PMID: 22431528]
  10. Am J Med. 2005 Feb;118(2):151-8 [PMID: 15694900]
  11. Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(6):355-63 [PMID: 22340898]
  12. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;192(2):414-21 [PMID: 15695980]
  13. Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):419-25 [PMID: 23628517]
  14. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Nov;21(11):1132-8 [PMID: 22873781]
  15. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1222-38 [PMID: 23090560]
  16. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 19;156(12):880-91, W312 [PMID: 22711081]
  17. Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):249-59 [PMID: 20182268]

Grants

  1. CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Communication Barriers
Community Health Centers
Culture
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Guideline Adherence
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Illinois
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Poverty
Time Factors
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Vaginal Smears

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0screeningintervalscancerbeliefsPatientknowledgePapextendingcervicalCenterstestingreportedyearCervicalCx3StudyFederallyQualifiedHealthwomensurveyhealthintentionsmajorityannualscreenedbarriersOBJECTIVE:DespiteguidelinesrecommendingextendedbeyondoneclinicalpracticeslowchangepreferencespotentialbarrierDiseaseControl'sCancerFQHCsacrossIllinoissurveyedpatientspracticesassessedregardinglengtheningMETHOD:analyzeddata984lowincome2009-2011ParticipantscompletedassessinghistorydemographicsRESULTS:61%24%2-3intervalrecommendationtimeMisunderstandingstestprevalenthalfbelievingvaginalyeastsexuallytransmittedinfections58%-72%Unfavorablecommon57%indicatedwait3yearsphysicianrecommendedassociatedCONCLUSION:intendedresistlongerPatients'lackunfavorablemayserveEarlydetectionHealthcaredisparitiesacceptancecarecompliance

Similar Articles

Cited By (24)