Social networking technologies as an emerging tool for HIV prevention: a cluster randomized trial.

Sean D Young, William G Cumberland, Sung-Jae Lee, Devan Jaganath, Greg Szekeres, Thomas Coates
Author Information

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social networking technologies are an emerging tool for HIV prevention.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether social networking communities can increase HIV testing among African American and Latino men who have sex with men (MSM).
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial with concealed allocation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01701206).
SETTING: Online.
PATIENTS: 112 MSM based in Los Angeles, more than 85% of whom were African American or Latino.
INTERVENTION: Sixteen peer leaders were randomly assigned to deliver information about HIV or general health to participants via Facebook groups over 12 weeks. After participants accepted a request to join the group, participation was voluntary. Group participation and engagement were monitored. Participants could request a free, home-based HIV testing kit and completed questionnaires at baseline and 12-week follow-up.
MEASUREMENTS: Participant acceptance of and engagement in the intervention and social network participation, rates of home-based HIV testing, and sexual risk behaviors.
RESULTS: Almost 95% of intervention participants and 73% of control participants voluntarily communicated using the social platform. Twenty-five of 57 intervention participants (44%) requested home-based HIV testing kits compared with 11 of 55 control participants (20%) (difference, 24 percentage points [95% CI, 8 to 41 percentage points]). Nine of the 25 intervention participants (36%) who requested the test took it and mailed it back compared with 2 of the 11 control participants (18%) who requested the test. Retention at study follow-up was more than 93%.
LIMITATION: Only 2 Facebook communities were included for each group.
CONCLUSION: Social networking communities are acceptable and effective tools to increase home-based HIV testing among at-risk populations.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Mental Health.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01701206

References

  1. AIDS Behav. 2012 Oct;16(7):1743-5 [PMID: 22821067]
  2. AIDS Behav. 2009 Jun;13(3):474-87 [PMID: 19037719]
  3. Eval Program Plann. 2007 Feb;30(1):82-93 [PMID: 17689315]
  4. Lancet. 1997 Nov 22;350(9090):1500-5 [PMID: 9388397]
  5. Arch Sex Behav. 2002 Apr;31(2):177-83 [PMID: 11974643]
  6. Am J Public Health. 1994 Dec;84(12):2027-8 [PMID: 7998654]
  7. Health Educ J. 2013 May;72(3):276-282 [PMID: 25530624]
  8. JAMA. 2000 Jul 26;284(4):443-6 [PMID: 10904506]
  9. JAMA. 2008 Aug 6;300(5):520-9 [PMID: 18677024]
  10. Health Psychol. 2003 Jan;22(1):111-6 [PMID: 12558209]
  11. AIDS Care. 2012;24(5):593-600 [PMID: 22149081]
  12. PLoS One. 2013 May 01;8(5):e62271 [PMID: 23658716]
  13. J Behav Med. 2008 Dec;31(6):463-77 [PMID: 18770021]
  14. Int J STD AIDS. 2003 Apr;14(4):285-6 [PMID: 12716501]

Grants

  1. K01 MH090884/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. K01 MH085503/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. AI 028697/NIAID NIH HHS
  4. K01 MH 090884/NIMH NIH HHS
  5. P30 MH058107/NIMH NIH HHS
  6. P30 AI028697/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Black or African American
HIV Infections
Health Education
Hispanic or Latino
Homosexuality, Male
Humans
Male
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Social Networking
Unsafe Sex

Chemicals

Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HIVparticipantstestingnetworkinghome-basedinterventionSocialsocialcommunitiesparticipationcontrolrequestedtechnologiesemergingtoolincreaseamongAfricanAmericanLatinomenMSMtrialFacebookrequestgroupengagementfollow-upcompared11percentagetest2BACKGROUND:preventionOBJECTIVE:determinewhethercansexDESIGN:RandomizedcontrolledconcealedallocationClinicalTrialsgov:NCT01701206SETTING:OnlinePATIENTS:112basedLosAngeles85%INTERVENTION:Sixteenpeerleadersrandomlyassigneddeliverinformationgeneralhealthviagroups12weeksacceptedjoinvoluntaryGroupmonitoredParticipantsfreekitcompletedquestionnairesbaseline12-weekMEASUREMENTS:ParticipantacceptancenetworkratessexualriskbehaviorsRESULTS:Almost95%73%voluntarilycommunicatedusingplatformTwenty-five5744%kits5520%difference24points[95%CI841points]Nine2536%tookmailedback18%Retentionstudy93%LIMITATION:includedCONCLUSION:acceptableeffectivetoolsat-riskpopulationsPRIMARYFUNDINGSOURCE:NationalInstituteMentalHealthprevention:clusterrandomized

Similar Articles

Cited By