New utility for an old tool: can a simple gait speed test predict ambulatory surgical discharge outcomes?

Charles A Odonkor, Robert B Schonberger, Feng Dai, Kirk H Shelley, David G Silverman, Paul G Barash
Author Information
  1. Charles A Odonkor: From the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (CAO, RBS, KHS, DGS, PGB); and Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (FD).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary aims of this study were to design prediction models based on a functional marker (preoperative gait speed) to predict readiness for home discharge time of 90 mins or less and to identify those at risk for unplanned admissions after elective ambulatory surgery.
DESIGN: This prospective observational cohort study evaluated all patients scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery. Home discharge readiness and unplanned admissions were the primary outcomes. Independent variables included preoperative gait speed, heart rate, and total anesthesia time. The relationship between all predictors and each primary outcome was determined in separate multivariable logistic regression models.
RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, gait speed with adjusted odds ratio of 3.71 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-11.26), P = 0.02, was independently associated with early home discharge readiness of 90 mins or less. Importantly, gait speed dichotomized as greater or less than 1 m/sec predicted unplanned admissions, with odds ratio of 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.76, P = 0.008) for those with speeds 1 m/sec or greater in comparison with those with speeds less than 1 m/sec. In a separate model, history of cardiac surgery with adjusted odds ratio of 7.5 (95% confidence interval, 2.34-24.41; P = 0.001) was independently associated with unplanned admissions after elective ambulatory surgery, when other covariates were held constant.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the use of novel prediction models based on gait speed testing to predict early home discharge and to identify those patients at risk for unplanned admissions after elective ambulatory surgery.

References

  1. Respir Res. 2005 Jun 08;6:54 [PMID: 15943867]
  2. Minerva Anestesiol. 1999 Jun;65(6):397-400 [PMID: 10394809]
  3. Eur J Public Health. 2013 Dec;23(6):964-71 [PMID: 23388242]
  4. Health Serv Manage Res. 2011 Nov;24(4):163-9 [PMID: 22040943]
  5. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Oct;53(10):1675-80 [PMID: 16181165]
  6. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83 [PMID: 3558716]
  7. JAMA. 2007 Feb 21;297(7):698; author reply 698-9 [PMID: 17312287]
  8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 9;56(20):1668-76 [PMID: 21050978]
  9. CRNA. 1992 Feb;3(1):2-6 [PMID: 1477682]
  10. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):771-6 [PMID: 21399994]
  11. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Dec;2(12):620-1 [PMID: 16306915]
  12. Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1421-6, table of contents [PMID: 18420856]
  13. J Post Anesth Nurs. 1988 Apr;3(2):114-7 [PMID: 2453664]
  14. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 9;56(20):1677-8 [PMID: 21050979]
  15. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):339-50 [PMID: 22188223]
  16. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Aug;58(8):728-33 [PMID: 12902531]
  17. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 May;78(2):138-49 [PMID: 20444620]
  18. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1727-34 [PMID: 17916121]
  19. JAMA. 2007 Feb 21;297(7):697-8; author reply 698-9 [PMID: 17312285]
  20. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Dec;68(12):1532-9 [PMID: 23657972]
  21. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 24;12:275 [PMID: 22925835]
  22. JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):93-4 [PMID: 21205972]
  23. Analyst. 2010 Nov;135(11):2841-7 [PMID: 20830430]
  24. JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):50-8 [PMID: 21205966]
  25. Anesth Analg. 1999 Mar;88(3):508-17 [PMID: 10071996]
  26. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 May;34(5):657-65 [PMID: 23467838]
  27. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990 Aug;34(6):486-91 [PMID: 2239122]
  28. Neurol Res. 2011 Nov;33(9):959-64 [PMID: 22080998]
  29. Anesth Analg. 1998 Sep;87(3):628-33 [PMID: 9728843]
  30. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 May;92(5):844-6 [PMID: 21530734]
  31. Anesth Analg. 1970 Nov-Dec;49(6):924-34 [PMID: 5534693]
  32. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Nov;59(11):1200-6 [PMID: 15602076]
  33. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Dec;58(12):2363-8 [PMID: 21143443]
  34. Age Ageing. 2009 Mar;38(2):156-62 [PMID: 19151165]
  35. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Nov;60(11):2127-36 [PMID: 23110433]
  36. J Clin Anesth. 2008 May;20(3):175-9 [PMID: 18502359]
  37. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Jun;38(3):189-99 [PMID: 15896692]
  38. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Aug;82(8):1050-6 [PMID: 11494184]
  39. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jun;60(6):1057-63 [PMID: 22690982]
  40. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jan;27(1):128-33 [PMID: 15621484]

Grants

  1. T32 GM086287/NIGMS NIH HHS
  2. UL1 RR024139/NCRR NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Blood Pressure
Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures
Comorbidity
Female
Gait
Heart Diseases
Heart Rate
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Patient Admission
Patient Discharge
Preoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0gaitspeeddischargeunplannedadmissionsambulatorysurgery0lesselective1primarystudymodelspredictreadinesshomeoddsratio95%confidenceintervalP=m/secpredictionbasedpreoperativetime90minsidentifyriskpatientsseparatecovariatesadjustedindependentlyassociatedearlygreaterspeedsOBJECTIVE:aimsdesignfunctionalmarkerDESIGN:prospectiveobservationalcohortevaluatedscheduledHomeoutcomesIndependentvariablesincludedheartratetotalanesthesiarelationshippredictorsoutcomedeterminedmultivariablelogisticregressionRESULTS:adjustment37121-112602Importantlydichotomizedpredicted3516-076008comparisonmodelhistorycardiac75234-2441001heldconstantCONCLUSIONS:demonstratesusenoveltestingNewutilityoldtool:cansimpletestsurgicaloutcomes?

Similar Articles

Cited By