Multiplicative surrogate standard deviation: a group metric for the glycemic variability of individual hospitalized patients.

Susan S Braithwaite, Guillermo E Umpierrez, J Geoffrey Chase
Author Information
  1. Susan S Braithwaite: Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1819 W. Polk Street, M/C 640, Chicago, IL 60612. braith@uic.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Group metrics are described to quantify blood glucose (BG) variability of hospitalized patients.
METHODS: The "multiplicative surrogate standard deviation" (MSSD) is the reverse-transformed group mean of the standard deviations (SDs) of the logarithmically transformed BG data set of each patient. The "geometric group mean" (GGM) is the reverse-transformed group mean of the means of the logarithmically transformed BG data set of each patient. Before reverse transformation is performed, the mean of means and mean of SDs each has its own SD, which becomes a multiplicative standard deviation (MSD) after reverse transformation. Statistical predictions and comparisons of parametric or nonparametric tests remain valid after reverse transformation. A subset of a previously published BG data set of 20 critically ill patients from the first 72 h of treatment under the SPRINT protocol was transformed logarithmically. After rank ordering according to the SD of the logarithmically transformed BG data of each patient, the cohort was divided into two equal groups, those having lower or higher variability.
RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the GGM was 106 (÷/× 1.07) mg/dl, and MSSD was 1.24 (÷/× 1.07). For the subgroups having lower and higher variability, respectively, the GGM did not differ, 104 (÷/× 1.07) versus 109 (÷/× 1.07) mg/dl, but the MSSD differed, 1.17 (÷/× 1.03) versus 1.31 (÷/× 1.05), p = .00004.
CONCLUSIONS: By using the MSSD with its MSD, groups can be characterized and compared according to glycemic variability of individual patient members.

References

  1. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Mar;37(3):435-43 [PMID: 21210080]
  2. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 01;3(6):1395-401 [PMID: 20144394]
  3. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1359-67 [PMID: 11794168]
  4. Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):1021-9 [PMID: 20124887]
  5. J Crit Care. 2012 Apr;27(2):119-24 [PMID: 22227079]
  6. Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R49 [PMID: 18412978]
  7. Circulation. 2005 Jun 14;111(23):3078-86 [PMID: 15939812]
  8. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Jul;2(4):584-94 [PMID: 19885234]
  9. Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Feb;13(1):138-54 [PMID: 23150242]
  10. Crit Care Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):3251-76 [PMID: 23164767]
  11. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1335-43 [PMID: 19564476]
  12. Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):3008-13 [PMID: 18824908]
  13. Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):838-42 [PMID: 20035218]
  14. Anesthesiology. 2006 Aug;105(2):244-52 [PMID: 16871057]

MeSH Term

Blood Glucose
Humans

Chemicals

Blood Glucose

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.01÷/×BGvariabilitystandardMSSDgroupmeanlogarithmicallytransformeddatapatient07patientssetGGMreversetransformationhospitalizedsurrogatereverse-transformedSDsmeansSDMSDaccordingcohortgroupslowerhighermg/dlversusglycemicindividualOBJECTIVE:GroupmetricsdescribedquantifybloodglucoseMETHODS:"multiplicativedeviation"deviations"geometricmean"performedbecomesmultiplicativedeviationStatisticalpredictionscomparisonsparametricnonparametrictestsremainvalidsubsetpreviouslypublished20criticallyillfirst72htreatmentSPRINTprotocolrankorderingdividedtwoequalRESULTS:entire10624subgroupsrespectivelydiffer104109differed17033105p=00004CONCLUSIONS:usingcancharacterizedcomparedmembersMultiplicativedeviation:metric

Similar Articles

Cited By