Effects of storage temperature on hematopoietic stability and microbial safety of BM aspirates.

S Hahn, W Sireis, K Hourfar, D Karpova, K Dauber, V A J Kempf, E Seifried, M Schmidt, H Bönig
Author Information
  1. S Hahn: German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
  2. W Sireis: German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
  3. K Hourfar: German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
  4. D Karpova: German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
  5. K Dauber: German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
  6. V A J Kempf: Institute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
  7. E Seifried: German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
  8. M Schmidt: German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
  9. H Bönig: 1] German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany [2] Department of Medicine/Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Abstract

Bone marrow (BM) remains a common source for hematopoietic SCT. Due to the transcutaneous approach, contamination with skin bacteria is common. The delay between harvest and transfusion can be considerable, potentially allowing for bacterial proliferation. The optimal transportation temperature, specifically with respect to bacterial growth and consequences thereof for hematopoietic quality, remain undefined. For 72 h, 66 individual BM samples, non-spiked/spiked with different bacteria, stored at 20-24 °C room temperature (RT) or 3-5 °C (cold), were serially analyzed for hematopoietic quality and microbial burden. Under most conditions, hematopoietic quality of BM was equal or better at RT: Typical BM contaminants (P. acnes and S. epidermidis) and E. coli were killed or bacterial proliferation was arrested at RT; hematopoietic quality was not impacted by the contamination. However, several pathogenic bacteria not typically found in BM (S. aureus and K. pneumoniae) proliferated dramatically at RT and impaired hematopoietic quality. Bacterial proliferation was arrested in the cold. The overwhelming majority of BM samples, that is, those that are sterile or contaminated only with skin commensals, will benefit from transportation at RT. Those bacteria that proliferate and perturb hematopoietic quality are not typically found in BM. Our data support recommendations for RT transportation and storage of BM.

References

  1. Transfusion. 1996 Sep;36(9):782-8 [PMID: 8823450]
  2. J Hematother. 1996 Jun;5(3):289-94 [PMID: 8817396]
  3. Cytotherapy. 2007;9(5):508-13 [PMID: 17786612]
  4. Transfusion. 1997 Mar;37(3):251-4 [PMID: 9122895]
  5. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jan;41(1):1-9 [PMID: 17982505]
  6. Vox Sang. 2011 Oct;101(3):191-9 [PMID: 21517896]
  7. Transfusion. 2013 Feb;53(2):394-7 [PMID: 22624657]
  8. Transfusion. 2000 Nov;40(11):1308-12 [PMID: 11099657]
  9. Vox Sang. 2012 Jul;103(1):87-8 [PMID: 22220739]
  10. Transfusion. 2001 Dec;41(12):1493-9 [PMID: 11778062]
  11. Transfusion. 2005 Jun;45(6):874-8 [PMID: 15934984]
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(3):537-46 [PMID: 10653869]
  13. Vox Sang. 1994;67(1):32-5 [PMID: 7975449]
  14. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Dec;26(11):1259-60 [PMID: 11149745]
  15. J Exp Med. 1960 Dec 1;112:1121-30 [PMID: 13769271]
  16. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(2):158-65 [PMID: 16698689]
  17. Transfus Sci. 1991;12(3):155-9 [PMID: 10149545]
  18. Clin Chem. 2009 Aug;55(8):1492-502 [PMID: 19498052]
  19. Exp Hematol. 2007 Feb;35(2):326-34 [PMID: 17258081]
  20. Transfusion. 1973 Sep-Oct;13(5):268-75 [PMID: 4584291]
  21. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 May;17(5):699-702 [PMID: 8733684]
  22. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 May;15(5):589-96 [PMID: 19361751]
  23. Cytotherapy. 2003;5(5):377-90 [PMID: 14578100]
  24. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Jan;127(1):e19-21 [PMID: 12562288]
  25. Transfusion. 1998 Jul;38(7):674-9 [PMID: 9683107]
  26. Blood. 1994 Nov 1;84(9):2833-9 [PMID: 7949160]
  27. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 May;45(5):811-8 [PMID: 20154736]
  28. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991 Mar;7(3):241-6 [PMID: 2059759]
  29. Transfusion. 1993 Mar;33(3):228-33 [PMID: 8438224]
  30. Transfusion. 1996 Jan;36(1):53-6 [PMID: 8607154]
  31. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1992;377:379-84 [PMID: 1438434]
  32. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997 Oct;20(8):621-9 [PMID: 9383224]
  33. Transfusion. 1988 Mar-Apr;28(2):109-12 [PMID: 3281332]
  34. Blood. 1970 Oct;36(4):507-15 [PMID: 4916999]
  35. Transfusion. 2007 Apr;47(4):636-43 [PMID: 17381622]
  36. Transfusion. 2001 Apr;41(4):477-82 [PMID: 11316897]
  37. Transfus Med. 1996 Jun;6(2):103-10 [PMID: 8809956]
  38. Transfusion. 2013 Aug;53(8):1834-42 [PMID: 23228098]
  39. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007 Jan;39(2):71-87 [PMID: 17213849]
  40. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1608-12 [PMID: 2116451]
  41. Transfusion. 2005 Sep;45(9):1512-7 [PMID: 16131385]
  42. Transfusion. 1986 Jul-Aug;26(4):331-4 [PMID: 2873668]
  43. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2003;:575-89 [PMID: 14633800]
  44. Blood. 2000 Jun 15;95(12):3702-9 [PMID: 10845900]
  45. Transfusion. 2011 Jan;51(1):137-47 [PMID: 20609197]
  46. Transfusion. 2006 Jun;46(6):949-55 [PMID: 16734811]
  47. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Nov;12(11):1142-9 [PMID: 17085307]
  48. Cytotherapy. 2011 Apr;13(4):449-58 [PMID: 21077730]
  49. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Jan;15(1):87-91 [PMID: 7742761]
  50. Transfusion. 2013 Nov;53(11):2690-6 [PMID: 23461309]
  51. J Gen Microbiol. 1984 Apr;130(4):803-7 [PMID: 6234376]
  52. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(7):963-5 [PMID: 18624618]
  53. Blood. 2002 Aug 1;100(3):761-7 [PMID: 12130483]
  54. Transfusion. 1991 Sep;31(7):620-6 [PMID: 1909820]

MeSH Term

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bone Marrow
Escherichia coli
Hematopoiesis
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Humans
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Propionibacterium acnes
Skin
Specimen Handling
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Stem Cells
Temperature
Time Factors
Tissue Preservation

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BMhematopoieticqualityRTbacteriabacterialproliferationtransportationtemperaturecommoncontaminationskinsamplescoldmicrobialSarrestedtypicallyfoundstorageBonemarrowremainssourceSCTDuetranscutaneousapproachdelayharvesttransfusioncanconsiderablepotentiallyallowingoptimalspecificallyrespectgrowthconsequencesthereofremainundefined72 h66individualnon-spiked/spikeddifferentstored20-24 °Croom3-5 °CseriallyanalyzedburdenconditionsequalbetterRT:TypicalcontaminantsPacnesepidermidisEcolikilledimpactedHoweverseveralpathogenicaureusKpneumoniaeproliferateddramaticallyimpairedBacterialoverwhelmingmajoritysterilecontaminatedcommensalswillbenefitproliferateperturbdatasupportrecommendationsEffectsstabilitysafetyaspirates

Similar Articles

Cited By