Immunoreactive somatolactin cells in the pituitary of young, migrating, spawning and spent chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha.

M Olivereau, M Rand-Weaver
Author Information
  1. M Olivereau: Laboratoire de Physiologie, Institut Océanographique, 195, rue Saint-Jacques, 75005, Paris, France.

Abstract

Immunocytochemical techniques using an antiserum to cod somatolactin (SL) demonstrated the presence of SL cells in the intermediate lobe of the pituitary in Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. The cells were small in yearling fish. Two groups of maturing fish were studied. In the spring run salmon collected in April and May during the upstream migration, the SL cells appeared stimulated. In September, during spawning, SL cell stimulation was maximal with indices of hypertrophy and degranulation often more marked in females than in males. In the other group, salmon of the fall run collected in the Pacific Ocean in August had well developed gonads, large gonadotropes and abundant SL cells. In spawning salmon (September) the SL cells were stimulated, mainly in females. However, the final stimulation was less intense than in spring run spawning fish. The SL cells were smaller, without evident granule release, but still abundant in spent salmon of the fall run caught at the end of November. Various factors (time spent in rivers before spawning, starvation, decalcification, stress, hypothalamic influences) were considered which might explain differences between spring and fall run salmon. These observations suggest that SL may play a role in the control of gonadal maturation in chinook salmon as it may also do in sockeye and chum salmon previously studied, and that SL cells may be sensitive to the ambient salinity.

References

  1. Fish Physiol Biochem. 1993 Jul;11(1-6):175-82 [PMID: 24202474]
  2. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1962 Jan 22;254:753-5 [PMID: 14481830]
  3. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1990 Mar;77(3):348-57 [PMID: 2186958]
  4. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1975 Sep;27(1):9-27 [PMID: 172403]
  5. Cell Tissue Res. 1981;219(1):9-26 [PMID: 7285100]
  6. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1990 Mar;77(3):358-67 [PMID: 2186959]
  7. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1983 May;50(2):252-60 [PMID: 6862173]
  8. J Endocrinol. 1993 Sep;138(3):509-15 [PMID: 8277224]
  9. Biol Cell. 1983;48(1):53-63 [PMID: 6673790]
  10. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1969;98(1):74-87 [PMID: 5807449]
  11. Fish Physiol Biochem. 1993 Jul;11(1-6):241-6 [PMID: 24202481]
  12. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1994 Jan;93(1):28-35 [PMID: 8138116]
  13. J Endocrinol. 1992 Jun;133(3):393-403 [PMID: 1613440]
  14. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1992 Jul;87(1):1-5 [PMID: 1624088]
  15. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1993 Sep;91(3):298-306 [PMID: 8224773]
  16. Biochemistry. 1991 Feb 12;30(6):1509-15 [PMID: 1993170]
  17. Endocrinology. 1989 Oct;125(4):1754-60 [PMID: 2791963]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SLcellssalmonrunspawningfishspringfallspentmaysomatolactinpituitaryOncorhynchustshawytschastudiedcollectedstimulatedSeptemberstimulationfemalesabundantchinookImmunocytochemicaltechniquesusingantiserumcoddemonstratedpresenceintermediatelobesmallyearlingTwogroupsmaturingAprilMayupstreammigrationappearedcellmaximalindiceshypertrophydegranulationoftenmarkedmalesgroupPacificOceanAugustwelldevelopedgonadslargegonadotropesmainlyHoweverfinallessintensesmallerwithoutevidentgranulereleasestillcaughtendNovemberVariousfactorstimeriversstarvationdecalcificationstresshypothalamicinfluencesconsideredmightexplaindifferencesobservationssuggestplayrolecontrolgonadalmaturationalsosockeyechumpreviouslysensitiveambientsalinityImmunoreactiveyoungmigrating

Similar Articles

Cited By