The effects of multisensory structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk high school foreign language learners.

R Sparks, L Ganschow, J Pohlman, S Skinner, M Artzer
Author Information
  1. R Sparks: College of Mount St. Joseph, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Abstract

Research findings suggest that most students who have foreign language learning problems have language-based difficulties and, in particular, phonological processing problems. Authors of the present study examined pre- and posttest scores on native language and foreign language aptitude tests of three groups of at-risk high school students enrolled in special, self-contained sections of first-year Spanish. Two groups were instructed using a multisensory structured language (MSL) approach. One of the groups was taught in both English and Spanish (MSL/ES), the other only in Spanish (MSL/S). The third group (NO-MSL) was instructed using more traditional second language teaching methodologies. Significant gains were made by the MSL-ES group on measures of native language phonology, vocabulary, and verbal memory and on a test of foreign language aptitude; the MSL/S group made significant gains on the test of foreign language aptitude. No significant gains on the native language or foreign language aptitude measures were made by the NO-MSL group. Implications for foreign language classroom instruction of at-risk students are discussed.

References

  1. Ann Dyslexia. 1988 Jan;38(1):276-84 [PMID: 24235046]
  2. Cognition. 1986 Nov;24(1-2):139-68 [PMID: 3791919]
  3. Ann Dyslexia. 1988 Jan;38(1):8-21 [PMID: 24235030]
  4. Ann Dyslexia. 1988 Jan;38(1):73-94 [PMID: 24235034]
  5. J Child Lang. 1984 Oct;11(3):627-43 [PMID: 6501469]
  6. J Learn Disabil. 1989 Aug-Sep;22(7):430-4 [PMID: 2769062]
  7. Ann Dyslexia. 1990 Jan;40(1):51-76 [PMID: 24233626]
  8. Ann Dyslexia. 1988 Jan;38(1):208-25 [PMID: 24235042]
  9. Ann Dyslexia. 1990 Jan;40(1):77-96 [PMID: 24233627]
  10. Ann Dyslexia. 1991 Jan;41(1):96-118 [PMID: 24233759]
  11. J Learn Disabil. 1991 Mar;24(3):178-86, 191 [PMID: 2026959]
  12. Ann Dyslexia. 1989 Jan;39(1):177-95 [PMID: 24233479]
  13. J Learn Disabil. 1987 Jun-Jul;20(6):327-30 [PMID: 3598381]
  14. Ann Dyslexia. 1985 Jan;35(1):187-98 [PMID: 24243416]
  15. Ann Dyslexia. 1988 Jan;38(1):154-77 [PMID: 24235039]
  16. Ann Dyslexia. 1987 Jan;37(1):189-200 [PMID: 24234994]
  17. J Learn Disabil. 1991 Nov;24(9):530-41 [PMID: 1765728]
  18. Cortex. 1986 Dec;22(4):627-32 [PMID: 3816247]
  19. Ann Dyslexia. 1985 Jan;35(1):67-96 [PMID: 24243410]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0languageforeignaptitudenativegroupstudentsgroupsat-riskSpanishgainsmadeproblemshighschoolinstructedusingmultisensorystructuredMSL/SNO-MSLmeasurestestsignificantinstructionResearchfindingssuggestlearninglanguage-baseddifficultiesparticularphonologicalprocessingAuthorspresentstudyexaminedpre-posttestscoresteststhreeenrolledspecialself-containedsectionsfirst-yearTwoMSLapproachOnetaughtEnglishMSL/ESthirdtraditionalsecondteachingmethodologiesSignificantMSL-ESphonologyvocabularyverbalmemoryImplicationsclassroomdiscussedeffectsskillslearners

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)