Epidemiological features and risk factors associated with the spatial and temporal distribution of human brucellosis in China.

Yin-Jun Li, Xin-Lou Li, Song Liang, Li-Qun Fang, Wu-Chun Cao
Author Information
  1. Li-Qun Fang: State Key Laboratory of Pathogens and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, 20 Dong-Da Street, Fengtai District, Beijing 100071, People's Republic of China. fanglq@bmi.ac.cn.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human brucellosis incidence in China has been increasing dramatically since 1999. However, epidemiological features and potential factors underlying the re-emergence of the disease remain less understood.
METHODS: Data on human and animal brucellosis cases at the county scale were collected for the year 2004 to 2010. Also collected were environmental and socioeconomic variables. Epidemiological features including spatial and temporal patterns of the disease were characterized, and the potential factors related to the spatial heterogeneity and the temporal trend of were analysed using Poisson regression analysis, Granger causality analysis, and autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) models, respectively.
RESULTS: The epidemic showed a significantly higher spatial correlation with the number of sheep and goats than swine and cattle. The disease was most prevalent in grassland areas with elevation between 800-1,600 meters. The ADL models revealed that local epidemics were correlated with comparatively lower temperatures and less sunshine in winter and spring, with a 1-7 month lag before the epidemic peak in May.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that human brucellosis tended to occur most commonly in grasslands at moderate elevation where sheep and goats were the predominant livestock, and in years with cooler winter and spring or less sunshine.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2010 Apr 23;5(4):e10322 [PMID: 20428240]
  2. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Aug;11(8):632-6 [PMID: 16008615]
  3. Vet Microbiol. 2002 Dec 20;90(1-4):497-519 [PMID: 12414167]
  4. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997 Apr-Jun;3(2):213-21 [PMID: 9204307]
  5. Euro Surveill. 2004 Dec 15;9(12):E15-6 [PMID: 15677842]
  6. Int J Infect Dis. 2009 Nov;13(6):749-53 [PMID: 19457689]
  7. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Jul;8(7):672-8 [PMID: 12095433]
  8. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Sep;6(9):540-1 [PMID: 16931403]
  9. Vet Ital. 2007 Jul-Sep;43(3):541-8 [PMID: 20422533]
  10. Lancet. 1996 Sep 21;348(9030):804-8 [PMID: 8813991]
  11. Acta Trop. 2005 Oct;96(1):1-8 [PMID: 16061190]
  12. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;18(9):1527-9 [PMID: 22931790]
  13. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012 Dec;66(3):436-44 [PMID: 23163875]
  14. Vet Microbiol. 2002 Dec 20;90(1-4):165-82 [PMID: 12414142]
  15. BMC Public Health. 2007 Nov 03;7:315 [PMID: 17980046]
  16. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;56(5):750-1 [PMID: 23175566]
  17. Prev Vet Med. 2003 Sep 12;60(4):297-306 [PMID: 12941554]
  18. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Dec;13(12):1895-900 [PMID: 18258041]
  19. Epidemiol Infect. 2000 Oct;125(2):309-13 [PMID: 11117954]
  20. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Feb;6(2):91-9 [PMID: 16439329]
  21. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2011 Mar;43(3):603-8 [PMID: 21082245]
  22. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Jul;118(7):915-20 [PMID: 20142167]
  23. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997 Apr-Jun;3(2):223-8 [PMID: 9204308]
  24. Vet Microbiol. 2002 Dec 20;90(1-4):11-8 [PMID: 12414129]
  25. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;16(12):2001-3 [PMID: 21122244]
  26. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1149:309-11 [PMID: 19120236]
  27. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Dec;7(12):775-86 [PMID: 18045560]
  28. J Travel Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):49-55 [PMID: 14769288]
  29. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Apr;9(4):485-8 [PMID: 12702232]
  30. Prev Vet Med. 2011 Nov 1;102(2):118-31 [PMID: 21571380]
  31. Lancet. 2003 Apr 26;361(9367):1459-69 [PMID: 12727414]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Animal Diseases
Animals
Brucellosis
Cattle
Child
Child, Preschool
China
Disease Outbreaks
Female
Goats
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Public Health
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Seasons
Sheep
Swine
Young Adult