Incidence of obesity among young U.S. children living in low-income families, 2008-2011.

Liping Pan, Ashleigh L May, Holly Wethington, Karen Dalenius, Laurence M Grummer-Strawn
Author Information
  1. Liping Pan: Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mail Stop F-77, Atlanta, GA 30341. Lpan@cdc.gov.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence and reverse of obesity among young low-income children and variations across population subgroups.
METHODS: We included 1.2 million participants in federally funded child health and nutrition programs who were 0 to 23 months old in 2008 and were followed up 24 to 35 months later in 2010-2011. Weight and height were measured. obesity at baseline was defined as gender-specific weight-for-length ≥95th percentile on the 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts. obesity at follow-up was defined as gender-specific BMI-for-age ≥95th percentile. We used a multivariable log-binomial model to estimate relative risk of obesity adjusting for gender, baseline age, race/ethnicity, duration of follow-up, and baseline weight-for-length percentile.
RESULTS: The incidence of obesity was 11.0% after the follow-up period. The incidence was significantly higher among boys versus girls and higher among children aged 0 to 11 months at baseline versus those older. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, the risk of obesity was 35% higher among Hispanics and 49% higher among American Indians (AIs)/Alaska Natives (ANs), but 8% lower among non-Hispanic African Americans. Among children who were obese at baseline, 36.5% remained obese and 63.5% were nonobese at follow-up. The proportion of reversing of obesity was significantly lower among Hispanics and AIs/ANs than that among other racial/ethnic groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence underscores the importance of early-life obesity prevention in multiple settings for low-income children and their families. The variations within population subgroups suggest that culturally appropriate intervention efforts should be focused on Hispanics and AIs/ANs.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pediatr. 2007 Jan;150(1):12-17.e2 [PMID: 17188605]
  2. Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):e594-601 [PMID: 16950951]
  3. N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 25;337(13):869-73 [PMID: 9302300]
  4. JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2563-5 [PMID: 23268509]
  5. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Nov;92(5):1257-64 [PMID: 20861173]
  6. JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):483-90 [PMID: 22253364]
  7. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Sep 10;59(RR-9):1-15 [PMID: 20829749]
  8. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:309-35 [PMID: 11274524]
  9. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):485-93 [PMID: 20147714]
  10. Soz Praventivmed. 2003;48(3):161-7 [PMID: 12891867]
  11. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120 Suppl 4:S164-92 [PMID: 18055651]
  12. JAMA. 2010 Jan 20;303(3):242-9 [PMID: 20071470]
  13. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120 Suppl 4:S193-228 [PMID: 18055652]
  14. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 May 15;157(10):940-3 [PMID: 12746247]
  15. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;5(6):547-56 [PMID: 18025493]
  16. Obes Res. 2003 Oct;11 Suppl:12S-22S [PMID: 14569035]
  17. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452 [PMID: 8594834]
  18. Eur J Pediatr. 2008 Oct;167(10):1183-9 [PMID: 18205011]
  19. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:6-28 [PMID: 17510091]
  20. Adv Data. 2000 Jun 8;(314):1-27 [PMID: 11183293]
  21. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Jul 24;58(28):769-73 [PMID: 19629026]
  22. Am J Hum Biol. 2003 May-Jun;15(3):446-60 [PMID: 12704721]
  23. Obes Res. 1998 Sep;6 Suppl 2:51S-209S [PMID: 9813653]
  24. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Feb;12(1):39-45 [PMID: 22280195]
  25. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Sep-Oct;16(5):381-7 [PMID: 20689385]

Grants

  1. CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Body Mass Index
Child, Preschool
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Food Assistance
Humans
Incidence
Income
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Models, Statistical
Multivariate Analysis
Obesity
Poverty
Risk Factors
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0amongobesityincidencechildrenbaselinefollow-uphigherlow-incomemonthspercentileHispanicsyoungvariationspopulationsubgroupshealth0Obesitydefinedgender-specificweight-for-length≥95thriskage11significantlyversusnon-Hispaniclowerobese5%AIs/ANsfamiliesOBJECTIVE:examinereverseacrossMETHODS:included12millionparticipantsfederallyfundedchildnutritionprograms23old2008followed2435later2010-2011Weightheightmeasured2000CentersDiseaseControlPreventiongrowthchartsBMI-for-ageusedmultivariablelog-binomialmodelestimaterelativeadjustinggenderrace/ethnicitydurationRESULTS:0%periodboysgirlsagedolderComparedwhites35%49%AmericanIndiansAIs/AlaskaNativesANs8%AfricanAmericansAmong36remained63nonobeseproportionreversingracial/ethnicgroupsCONCLUSIONS:highunderscoresimportanceearly-lifepreventionmultiplesettingswithinsuggestculturallyappropriateinterventioneffortsfocusedIncidenceUSliving2008-2011childhoodinfancypopulation-basedstudiespreschoolpublic

Similar Articles

Cited By (35)