The fixed-dose combination of olmesartan/amlodipine was superior in central aortic blood pressure reduction compared with perindopril/amlodipine: a randomized, double-blind trial in patients with hypertension.

Luis Ruilope, Angie Schaefer
Author Information
  1. Luis Ruilope: Hypertension Unit, Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28041, Madrid, Spain, ruilope@ad-hocbox.com.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Central blood pressure (BP), an important measure of cardiovascular risk, has been shown to be effectively reduced by calcium channel blockade with amlodipine (AML) plus renin-angiotensin system blockade by the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, perindopril (PER). The aim of the SEVITENSION study was to compare the central effects of PER/AML against renin-angiotensin system blockade with the angiotensin II receptor blocker olmesartan (OLM) plus AML.
METHODS: In this multicenter, parallel group, non-inferiority study, patients received AML 10 mg during a 2- to 4-week run-in before randomization to 24 weeks of double-blind treatment with the fixed-dose combination of OLM/AML 40/10 mg or PER/AML 8/10 mg. Hydrochlorothiazide was added at Weeks 4, 8, or 12 in patients with inadequate BP control. The primary efficacy variable was the absolute change in central systolic BP (CSBP) from baseline to the final examination, measured by radial artery applanation tonometry and analyzed by parametric analysis of covariance. Secondary variables included 24-h ambulatory and seated BP measurements as well as BP normalization.
RESULTS: Of 600 patients enrolled, 486 were randomized (244 to OLM/AML 40/10 mg, 242 to PER/AML 8/10 mg). The reduction in CSBP was larger with OLM/AML (14.5 ± 0.83 mmHg) than with PER/AML (10.4 ± 0.84 mmHg). The between-group difference was -4.2 ± 1.18 mmHg with 95% confidence intervals (-6.48 to -1.83 mmHg) within the predefined non-inferiority margin (2 mmHg). An integrated superiority test confirmed that OLM/AML was superior to PER/AML (p < 0.0001) in reducing CSBP. The superiority of OLM/AML over PER/AML was also established for the majority of secondary efficacy variables; at the final examination, 75.6% of OLM/AML recipients achieved BP normalization (mean seated systolic BP/diastolic BP <140/90 mmHg) compared with 57.5% of PER/AML recipients (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The combination of OLM/AML was superior to PER/AML in reducing CSBP and other efficacy measures, including a significantly higher rate of BP normalization.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01101009

References

  1. Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50(1):197-203 [PMID: 17485598]
  2. Clin Ther. 2008 Apr;30(4):587-604 [PMID: 18498909]
  3. J Hypertens. 2012 Jul;30(7):1468-77 [PMID: 22573127]
  4. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Sep;32(5):710-6 [PMID: 21586342]
  5. N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 10;358(15):1547-59 [PMID: 18378520]
  6. J Hypertens. 2009 Mar;27(3):461-7 [PMID: 19330899]
  7. J Hypertens. 2009 Jun;27(6):1123-5 [PMID: 19454902]
  8. J Hum Hypertens. 2013 Jul;27(7):405-11 [PMID: 23535990]
  9. Eur Heart J. 2013 Jul;34(28):2159-219 [PMID: 23771844]
  10. Circulation. 2006 Mar 7;113(9):1213-25 [PMID: 16476843]
  11. J Hypertens. 2013 Jan;31(1):103-8 [PMID: 23137953]
  12. J Hypertens. 2007 Jul;25(7):1327-36 [PMID: 17563549]
  13. J Hypertens. 2007 Jun;25(6):1105-87 [PMID: 17563527]
  14. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jun 24;51(25):2432-9 [PMID: 18565402]
  15. Drugs. 2008;68(9):1239-72 [PMID: 18547134]
  16. J Hypertens. 2009 Nov;27(11):2121-58 [PMID: 19838131]
  17. Lancet. 2005 Sep 10-16;366(9489):895-906 [PMID: 16154016]
  18. Blood Press Monit. 2004 Aug;9(4):179-85 [PMID: 15311144]
  19. Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(1):11-25 [PMID: 19067471]
  20. J Hypertens. 2010 Nov;28(11):2342-50 [PMID: 20829713]
  21. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3):547-51 [PMID: 16458134]
  22. J Hypertens. 2005 Dec;23(12):2157-72 [PMID: 16269957]
  23. Hypertension. 2001 Oct;38(4):932-7 [PMID: 11641312]
  24. Lancet. 2004 Jun 19;363(9426):2049-51 [PMID: 15207957]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Amlodipine
Confidence Intervals
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Combinations
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hypertension
Imidazoles
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Perindopril
Risk Assessment
Tetrazoles
Treatment Outcome

Chemicals

Drug Combinations
Imidazoles
Tetrazoles
amlodipine, perindopril drug combination
Amlodipine
olmesartan
Perindopril

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BPPER/AMLOLM/AMLmmHgmgpatientsCSBP0blockadeAMLcentralcombinationefficacynormalization±superiorbloodpressureplusrenin-angiotensinsystemstudynon-inferiority10double-blindfixed-dose40/108/104systolicfinalexaminationvariablesseatedrandomizedreduction832superiorityp<0001reducingrecipientscomparedINTRODUCTION:Centralimportantmeasurecardiovascularriskshowneffectivelyreducedcalciumchannelamlodipineangiotensin-convertingenzymeinhibitorperindoprilPERaimSEVITENSIONcompareeffectsangiotensinIIreceptorblockerolmesartanOLMMETHODS:multicenterparallelgroupreceived2-4-weekrun-inrandomization24weekstreatmentHydrochlorothiazideaddedWeeks812inadequatecontrolprimaryvariableabsolutechangebaselinemeasuredradialarteryapplanationtonometryanalyzedparametricanalysiscovarianceSecondaryincluded24-hambulatorymeasurementswellRESULTS:600enrolled486244242larger14584between-groupdifference-411895%confidenceintervals-648-1withinpredefinedmarginintegratedtestconfirmedalsoestablishedmajoritysecondary756%achievedmeanBP/diastolic<140/90575%CONCLUSION:measuresincludingsignificantlyhigherrateolmesartan/amlodipineaorticperindopril/amlodipine:trialhypertension

Similar Articles

Cited By