Double recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG strain for screening of primary and rationale-based antimycobacterial compounds.

Vandana Singh, Rajesh Kumar Biswas, Bhupendra N Singh
Author Information
  1. Vandana Singh: Division of Microbiology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.

Abstract

Conventional antimycobacterial screening involves CFU analysis, which poses a great challenge due to slow growth of mycobacteria. Recombinant strains carrying reporter genes under the influence of constitutive promoters allow rapid and wide screening of compounds but without revealing their modes of action. Reporter strains using pathway-specific promoters provide a better alternative but allow a limited screening of compounds interfering with only a particular metabolic pathway. This reduces these strains to merely a second-line screening system, as they fail to identify even the more potent compounds if they are not inhibiting the pathway of interest. In this study, we have generated a double recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG strain carrying firefly and Renilla luciferase genes as two reporters under the control of a constitutive and an inducible mycobacterial promoter. The presence of dual reporters allows simultaneous expression and analysis of two reporter enzymes within a single system. The expression profile of the firefly luciferase gene, rendered by a constitutive mycobacterial promoter, coincides with the decline in bacterial growth in response to a wide range of antimycobacterial drugs, while the enhanced expression of Renilla luciferase mirrors the selective induction of the reporter gene expression as a result of pathway-specific inhibition. Thus, the double recombinant strain allows the screening of both primary and rationally synthesized antimycobacterial compounds in a single assay. The inhibiting response of drugs was monitored with a dual-luciferase reporter assay which can be easily adapted in high-throughput mode.

References

  1. Mol Microbiol. 1999 Jan;31(2):715-24 [PMID: 10027986]
  2. Curr Microbiol. 2008 Jun;56(6):574-80 [PMID: 18324436]
  3. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999 Jun 1;175(1):79-85 [PMID: 10361711]
  4. PLoS One. 2010 May 24;5(5):e10777 [PMID: 20520722]
  5. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2002 Mar;55(3):279-87 [PMID: 12014443]
  6. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Feb;67(2):404-14 [PMID: 22101217]
  7. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29774 [PMID: 22253776]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 26;96(22):12833-8 [PMID: 10536008]
  9. J Bacteriol. 1999 Jul;181(14):4326-33 [PMID: 10400591]
  10. J Bacteriol. 2000 Apr;182(7):1802-11 [PMID: 10714983]
  11. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000 Dec 20;279(2):457-61 [PMID: 11118308]
  12. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Dec;24(6):976-81 [PMID: 3097069]
  13. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012 Mar 01;11(3):171-2 [PMID: 22378254]
  14. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Nov;31(5):1209-15 [PMID: 11073754]
  15. Nature. 1991 Jun 6;351(6326):456-60 [PMID: 1904554]
  16. Tuber Lung Dis. 1997;78(5-6):211-23 [PMID: 10209675]
  17. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Sep;68(9):2118-27 [PMID: 23633686]
  18. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45905 [PMID: 23029305]
  19. Bioorg Med Chem. 2012 Sep 1;20(17):5150-63 [PMID: 22854194]
  20. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010 Apr;17(4):513-7 [PMID: 20107000]
  21. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010 Dec 1;18(23):8289-301 [PMID: 21041091]
  22. Microbiology (Reading). 1995 Aug;141 ( Pt 8):1785-1792 [PMID: 7551043]
  23. J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Nov;105(5):1703-10 [PMID: 18828789]
  24. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jun;37(6):1348-52 [PMID: 8328785]
  25. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Feb 01;33(2):e21 [PMID: 15687379]
  26. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Mar;41(3):570-4 [PMID: 9055994]
  27. Genome Res. 2004 Jan;14(1):90-8 [PMID: 14707172]
  28. J Bacteriol. 2009 Apr;191(8):2888-93 [PMID: 19218386]
  29. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Jul;45(7):1943-6 [PMID: 11408205]

MeSH Term

Antitubercular Agents
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
Genes, Reporter
Luciferases, Firefly
Luciferases, Renilla
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Mycobacterium bovis
Organisms, Genetically Modified
Promoter Regions, Genetic
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Chemicals

Antitubercular Agents
Luciferases, Renilla
Luciferases, Firefly

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0screeningcompoundsantimycobacterialreporterexpressionstrainsconstitutiverecombinantstrainluciferaseanalysisgrowthcarryinggenespromotersallowwidepathway-specificpathwaysysteminhibitingdoubleMycobacteriumbovisBCGfireflyRenillatworeportersmycobacterialpromoterallowssinglegeneresponsedrugsprimaryassayConventionalinvolvesCFUposesgreatchallengedueslowmycobacteriaRecombinantinfluencerapidwithoutrevealingmodesactionReporterusingprovidebetteralternativelimitedinterferingparticularmetabolicreducesmerelysecond-linefailidentifyevenpotentintereststudygeneratedcontrolinduciblepresencedualsimultaneousenzymeswithinprofilerenderedcoincidesdeclinebacterialrangeenhancedmirrorsselectiveinductionresultinhibitionThusrationallysynthesizedmonitoreddual-luciferasecaneasilyadaptedhigh-throughputmodeDoublerationale-based

Similar Articles

Cited By