Expression of CD26 and CXCR4 in prostate carcinoma and its relationship with clinical parameters.

Zhong Lu, Li Qi, Xue Jun Bo, Guo Dong Liu, Jun Ming Wang, Guixin Li
Author Information
  1. Zhong Lu: Department of Oncology, Clinical College of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong province, China.
  2. Li Qi: Department of Oncology, Clinical College of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong province, China.
  3. Xue Jun Bo: Department of Urology, the People's Hospital of Dongying City, Dongying, Shandong province, China.
  4. Guo Dong Liu: Department of Urology, the People's Hospital of Weifang City, Weifang, Shandong province, China.
  5. Jun Ming Wang: Department of Oncology, Clinical College of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong province, China.
  6. Guixin Li: Department of Oncology, Clinical College of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong province, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancer types both in western and eastern countries, involving mostly elder men. The mechanisms underlying the prostate cancer development remain unclear. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the only well accepted marker for prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer are facing big challenges. Here, we evaluated the expression of Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26/DPPIV) and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), two known cancer-related molecules but without clear data on prostate cancer population, and their correlation with clinical parameters in prostate cancer tissue array. To explore the correlation of CD26 and CXCR4 expression in prostate carcinoma and their relationship with clinical parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We immunohistochemically stained the tissue array containing samples from 36 cases with prostate cancer with CD26 and CXCR4 antibodies. Then we analyzed the expression of CD26 and CXCR4 and its relationship with clinical parameters. We used immunohistochemical staining to evaluate the expression of CD26 and CXCR4 in a set of tissue array containing 36 cases of prostate cancers and eight peritumoral normal prostatic tissues. The data were statistically analyzed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.0 software. The difference between parameters was compared with nonparametric test and correlation analysis was performed with Spearman test. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
RESULTS: We found both CD26 and CXCR4 expression were higher in cancer tissue than in normal tissues. CD26 and CXCR4 levels were correlated with each other. Moreover, CD26 was correlated with PSA level, tumor residue, cancer stage, and tumor size in the studied samples.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that CD26 may be a good indicator for cancer behaviors of prostate cancer in clinic.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Cancer. 2010 May 11;10:193 [PMID: 20459800]
  2. Oncol Rep. 2010 May;23(5):1247-55 [PMID: 20372837]
  3. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008;25(7):765-76 [PMID: 18563594]
  4. Histopathology. 2011 Jun;58(7):1117-26 [PMID: 21438909]
  5. Pathol Int. 2010 Jul;60(7):497-505 [PMID: 20594270]
  6. Front Biosci. 2008 Jan 01;13:1634-45 [PMID: 17981655]
  7. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jan 15;10(2):508-20 [PMID: 14760072]
  8. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2007 Mar;7(3):253-73 [PMID: 17346218]
  9. BMC Cancer. 2010 Jun 28;10:333 [PMID: 20584285]
  10. J Hepatol. 1997 Aug;27(2):337-45 [PMID: 9288609]
  11. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2005;22(8):653-62 [PMID: 16703414]
  12. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008 Nov;7(11):1849-51 [PMID: 18981717]
  13. J Biol Chem. 2001 Jun 1;276(22):19532-9 [PMID: 11278278]
  14. Prostate. 2006 Jan 1;66(1):32-48 [PMID: 16114056]
  15. Cancer Sci. 2008 Mar;99(3):539-42 [PMID: 18201276]
  16. Cancer Res. 2002 Mar 15;62(6):1832-7 [PMID: 11912162]
  17. Cardiovasc Res. 2010 Feb 1;85(3):494-502 [PMID: 19762327]
  18. Cell Stem Cell. 2010 Jun 4;6(6):603-15 [PMID: 20569697]
  19. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(23):2943-51 [PMID: 19689275]
  20. BMC Cancer. 2011 Feb 01;11:51 [PMID: 21284881]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cancerprostateCD26CXCR4expressionparametersclinicaltissuedatacorrelationarrayrelationshipPSAdiagnosiscarcinomacontainingsamples36casesanalyzednormaltissues0testcorrelatedtumorBACKGROUND:ProstateonecommontypeswesterneasterncountriesinvolvingmostlyeldermenmechanismsunderlyingdevelopmentremainunclearProstate-specificantigenwellacceptedmarkerprognosistreatmentfacingbigchallengesevaluatedDipeptidylpeptidaseIVCD26/DPPIVC-X-Cchemokinereceptortype4twoknowncancer-relatedmoleculeswithoutclearpopulationexploreMATERIALSANDMETHODS:immunohistochemicallystainedantibodiesusedimmunohistochemicalstainingevaluatesetcancerseightperitumoralprostaticstatisticallyStatisticalPackageSocialSciencesSPSS16softwaredifferencecomparednonparametricanalysisperformedSpearmanP<05consideredsignificantRESULTS:foundhigherlevelsMoreoverlevelresiduestagesizestudiedCONCLUSION:indicatemaygoodindicatorbehaviorsclinicExpressionBiomarkerimmunohistochemistry

Similar Articles

Cited By