Discontinuities between maternity and child and family health services: health professional's perceptions.

Kim Psaila, Virginia Schmied, Cathrine Fowler, Sue Kruske
Author Information
  1. Kim Psaila: School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta Campus, Penrith South DC 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. K.Psaila@uws.edu.au.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuity in the context of healthcare refers to the perception of the client that care has been connected and coherent over time. For over a decade professionals providing maternity and child and family health (CFH) services in Australia and internationally have emphasised the importance of continuity of care for women, families and children. However, continuity across maternity and CFH services remains elusive. Continuity is defined and implemented in different ways, resulting in fragmentation of care particularly at points of transition from one service or professional to another.This paper examines the concept of continuity across the maternity and CFH service continuum from the perspectives of midwifery, CFH nursing, general practitioner (GP) and practice nurse (PN) professional leaders.
METHODS: Data were collected as part of a three phase mixed methods study investigating the feasibility of implementing a national approach to CFH services in Australia (CHoRUS study). Representatives from the four participating professional groups were consulted via discussion groups, focus groups and e-conversations, which were recorded and transcribed. In total, 132 professionals participated, including 45 midwives, 60 CFH nurses, 15 general practitioners and 12 practice nurses. Transcripts were analysed using a thematic approach.
RESULTS: 'Continuity' was used and applied differently within and across groups. Aspects of care most valued by professionals included continuity preferably characterised by the development of a relationship with the family (relational continuity) and good communication (informational continuity). When considering managerial continuity we found professionals' were most concerned with co-ordination of care within their own service, rather than focusing on the co-ordination between services.
CONCLUSION: These findings add new perspectives to understanding continuity within the maternity and CFH services continuum of care. All health professionals consulted were committed to a smooth journey for families along the continuum. Commitment to collaboration is required if service gaps are to be addressed particularly at the point of transition of care between services which was found to be particularly problematic.

References

  1. Aust Fam Physician. 2011 Jan-Feb;40(1-2):12-5 [PMID: 21301686]
  2. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2009 Mar;32(1):177-97 [PMID: 19248924]
  3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Mar 23;11:63 [PMID: 21429224]
  4. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jun;96(6):533-40 [PMID: 21429975]
  5. Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(2):186-94 [PMID: 21645476]
  6. Health Mark Q. 2010 Apr;27(2):195-214 [PMID: 20446141]
  7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD004667 [PMID: 18843666]
  8. BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jan 03;14:2 [PMID: 23282013]
  9. Fam Pract. 2003 Dec;20(6):623-7 [PMID: 14701883]
  10. Contemp Nurse. 2011 Dec;40(1):71-86 [PMID: 22545907]
  11. J Paediatr Child Health. 2003 May-Jun;39(4):249-53 [PMID: 12755928]
  12. Health Soc Care Community. 2003 Sep;11(5):397-404 [PMID: 14498836]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109 Suppl 2:17149-53 [PMID: 23045650]
  14. J Clin Nurs. 2010 Dec;19(23-24):3516-26 [PMID: 20946442]
  15. Int Nurs Rev. 2012 Jun;59(2):200-7 [PMID: 22591091]
  16. J Scand Stud Criminol Crime Prev. 2008 Dec 1;9(S1):2-24 [PMID: 20885797]
  17. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2012;7: [PMID: 22783367]
  18. Contemp Nurse. 2006 Dec-2007 Jan;23(2):303-11 [PMID: 17343533]
  19. Contemp Nurse. 2011 Dec;40(1):106-17 [PMID: 22545909]
  20. Aust Fam Physician. 2001 Oct;Spec No:S1i-xvi, S1-1-61 [PMID: 11706616]
  21. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Feb;45(2):232-45 [PMID: 17049352]
  22. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Apr;16(2):67-74 [PMID: 20592048]
  23. Psychol Rev. 1994 Oct;101(4):568-86 [PMID: 7984707]
  24. Contemp Nurse. 2005 Dec;20(2):134-42 [PMID: 16393095]
  25. BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1483-92 [PMID: 22830446]
  26. Women Birth. 2009 Jun;22(2):64-72 [PMID: 19217366]
  27. Aust Health Rev. 2004;27(2):13-6 [PMID: 15525232]
  28. BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 04;2(5): [PMID: 22952161]
  29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109 Suppl 2:17302-7 [PMID: 23045654]
  30. Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):1692-702 [PMID: 17015563]

MeSH Term

Attitude of Health Personnel
Australia
Child
Child Health Services
Communication
Continuity of Patient Care
Female
Focus Groups
General Practitioners
Health Personnel
Humans
Infant
Maternal Health Services
Midwifery
Nurses
Pregnancy
Telecommunications

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0continuitycareCFHservicesmaternityprofessionalshealthservicegroupsfamilyacrossparticularlyprofessionalcontinuumwithinContinuitychildAustraliafamiliestransitionperspectivesgeneralpracticestudyapproachconsultednursesfoundco-ordinationBACKGROUND:contexthealthcarerefersperceptionclientconnectedcoherenttimedecadeprovidinginternationallyemphasisedimportancewomenchildrenHoweverremainselusivedefinedimplementeddifferentwaysresultingfragmentationpointsoneanotherThispaperexaminesconceptmidwiferynursingpractitionerGPnursePNleadersMETHODS:DatacollectedpartthreephasemixedmethodsinvestigatingfeasibilityimplementingnationalCHoRUSRepresentativesfourparticipatingviadiscussionfocuse-conversationsrecordedtranscribedtotal132participatedincluding45midwives6015practitioners12TranscriptsanalysedusingthematicRESULTS:'Continuity'usedapplieddifferentlyAspectsvaluedincludedpreferablycharacteriseddevelopmentrelationshiprelationalgoodcommunicationinformationalconsideringmanagerialprofessionals'concernedratherfocusingCONCLUSION:findingsaddnewunderstandingcommittedsmoothjourneyalongCommitmentcollaborationrequiredgapsaddressedpointproblematicDiscontinuitiesservices:professional'sperceptions

Similar Articles

Cited By