Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

William R Reed, Cynthia R Long, Gregory N Kawchuk, Joel G Pickar
Author Information
  1. William R Reed: Associate Professor, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa.
  2. Cynthia R Long: Professor, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa.
  3. Gregory N Kawchuk: Associate Professor, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  4. Joel G Pickar: Professor Emeritus, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa. Electronic address: jgpickar@live.com.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine how the preload that precedes a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM) affects muscle spindle input from lumbar paraspinal muscles both during and after the HVLA-SM.
METHODS: Primary afferent activity from muscle spindles in lumbar paraspinal muscles were recorded from the L6 dorsal root in anesthetized cats. High-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation of the L6 vertebra was preceded either by no preload or systematic changes in the preload magnitude, duration, and the presence or absence of a downward incisural point. Immediate effects of preload on muscle spindle responses to the HVLA-SM were determined by comparing mean instantaneous discharge frequencies (MIF) during the HVLA-SM's thrust phase with baseline. Longer lasting effects of preload on spindle responses to the HVLA-SM were determined by comparing MIF during slow ramp and hold movement of the L6 vertebra before and after the HVLA-SM.
RESULTS: The smaller compared with the larger preload magnitude and the longer compared with the shorter preload duration significantly increased (P = .02 and P = .04, respectively) muscle spindle responses during the HVLA-SM thrust. The absence of preload had the greatest effect on the change in MIF. Interactions between preload magnitude, duration, and downward incisural point often produced statistically significant but arguably physiologically modest changes in the passive signaling properties of the muscle spindle after the manipulation.
CONCLUSION: Because preload parameters in this animal model were shown to affect neural responses to an HVLA-SM, preload characteristics should be taken into consideration when judging this intervention's therapeutic benefit in both clinical efficacy studies and in clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):814-20 [PMID: 22721784]
  2. J Physiol. 2005 Dec 1;569(Pt 2):655-65 [PMID: 16210357]
  3. J Neurosci Methods. 1999 Jul 15;89(2):87-96 [PMID: 10491938]
  4. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1975 Mar;74(7):638-50 [PMID: 124754]
  5. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Aug;197(4):369-77 [PMID: 19590861]
  6. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1982;5:171-87 [PMID: 6462095]
  7. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Sep;33(7):542-53 [PMID: 20937432]
  8. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:492039 [PMID: 23401713]
  9. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):531-8 [PMID: 19027342]
  10. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008 Dec 10;(12):1-23 [PMID: 19361005]
  11. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Nov-Dec;16(9):573-7 [PMID: 8133191]
  12. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):632-42 [PMID: 22513367]
  13. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Jan;24(1):2-11 [PMID: 11174689]
  14. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Oct;13(8):448-53 [PMID: 2146356]
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 1;30(1):115-22 [PMID: 15626991]
  16. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Jul;35(6):437-45 [PMID: 22902139]
  17. Spine J. 2001 Mar-Apr;1(2):121-30 [PMID: 14588392]
  18. Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):583-95 [PMID: 17905321]
  19. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jul;18(9):1206-12 [PMID: 8362328]
  20. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 1;25(19):2519-24;discussion 2525 [PMID: 11013505]
  21. Spine J. 2002 Sep-Oct;2(5):357-71 [PMID: 14589467]
  22. Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1332-8 [PMID: 24139864]
  23. Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):320-8 [PMID: 17938002]
  24. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Mar-Apr;24(3):157-69 [PMID: 11313611]
  25. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Mar;39(2):324-30 [PMID: 130469]
  26. Man Ther. 2012 Dec;17(6):577-83 [PMID: 22809745]
  27. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Feb;36(2):68-77 [PMID: 23499141]
  28. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Dec;111(6):1735-43 [PMID: 21960662]
  29. Spine J. 2011 May;11(5):440-6 [PMID: 21463970]
  30. Prog Neurobiol. 1993 Dec;41(6):705-21 [PMID: 8140258]
  31. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Jul-Aug;23(6):380-94 [PMID: 10951308]
  32. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Jul-Aug;18(6):347-52 [PMID: 7595108]
  33. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):643-7 [PMID: 22197083]
  34. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Mar;21(3):254-62 [PMID: 16378668]
  35. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Feb;26(2):65-9 [PMID: 12584504]
  36. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):22-31 [PMID: 16396726]
  37. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1722-9 [PMID: 19164108]
  38. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):670-91 [PMID: 22534288]
  39. J Physiol. 1990 May;424:93-107 [PMID: 2391663]

Grants

  1. U19 AT004137/NCCIH NIH HHS
  2. U19AT004137/NCCIH NIH HHS
  3. C06RR15433/NCRR NIH HHS
  4. C06 RR015433/NCRR NIH HHS
  5. K01 AT005935/NCCIH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Cats
Lumbar Vertebrae
Manipulation, Spinal
Muscle Spindles
Paraspinal Muscles

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0preloadHVLA-SMmusclespindleresponseslow-amplitudespinalmanipulationL6magnitudedurationMIFparametershigh-velocitylumbarparaspinalmusclesvertebrachangesabsencedownwardincisuralpointeffectsdeterminedcomparingthrustcomparedP=effectclinicalOBJECTIVE:purposestudydetermineprecedesaffectsinputMETHODS:PrimaryafferentactivityspindlesrecordeddorsalrootanesthetizedcatsHigh-velocityprecededeithersystematicpresenceImmediatemeaninstantaneousdischargefrequenciesHVLA-SM'sphasebaselineLongerlastingslowrampholdmovementRESULTS:smallerlargerlongershortersignificantlyincreased0204respectivelygreatestchangeInteractionsoftenproducedstatisticallysignificantarguablyphysiologicallymodestpassivesignalingpropertiesCONCLUSION:animalmodelshownaffectneuralcharacteristicstakenconsiderationjudgingintervention'stherapeuticbenefitefficacystudiespracticeNeuralmechanicalmanipulation:CatChiropracticDosageFormsMuscleSpindlesNeurophysiologySpinalManipulationSpine

Similar Articles

Cited By