Motivational interviewing-based interventions and diabetes mellitus.

Ashlee A Clifford Mulimba, James Byron-Daniel
Author Information
  1. Ashlee A Clifford Mulimba: Freelance Health Psychologist and Visiting Lecturer, University of Greenwich, London.
  2. James Byron-Daniel: Lecturer and Programme Leader, University of the West of England, Bristol.

Abstract

This review assesses whether motivational interviewing (MI)-based interventions are effective at improving health behaviours in adults with diabetes. Electronic databases were searched for articles that investigated the use of MI and diabetes self-management between 1966 and March 2010. In total, 464 titles were found; after duplicates were removed, 112 studies remained. Of these, 24 abstracts were identified as potentially relevant. No studies were excluded on the basis of their methodology. By use of a data extraction sheet, eight studies were identified as relevant once full articles were examined. Positive results in health-behaviour improvement were reported in four studies. These were: reduced smoking, improved blood glucose, improved diet and weight management. Studies varied in quality; four were methodologically weak owing to small sample sizes, lack of clarity of scoring measurement tools and/or limited use of valid measurements, and reported inclusion/exclusion criteria. In conclusion, MI cannot be recommended as an evidenced-based approach to diabetes self-management.

MeSH Term

Diabetes Mellitus
Health Behavior
Humans
Motivation
Self Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diabetesstudiesMIuseinterventionsarticlesself-managementidentifiedrelevantreportedfourimprovedreviewassesseswhethermotivationalinterviewing-basedeffectiveimprovinghealthbehavioursadultsElectronicdatabasessearchedinvestigated1966March2010total464titlesfoundduplicatesremoved112remained24abstractspotentiallyexcludedbasismethodologydataextractionsheeteightfullexaminedPositiveresultshealth-behaviourimprovementwere:reducedsmokingbloodglucosedietweightmanagementStudiesvariedqualitymethodologicallyweakowingsmallsamplesizeslackclarityscoringmeasurementtoolsand/orlimitedvalidmeasurementsinclusion/exclusioncriteriaconclusionrecommendedevidenced-basedapproachMotivationalinterviewing-basedmellitus

Similar Articles

Cited By