Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg once daily in major depressive disorder: a review with expert commentary.

Susan G Ball, Durisala Desaiah, Qi Zhang, Michael E Thase, David G S Perahia
Author Information
  1. Susan G Ball: Lilly Research Laboratory, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA;
  2. Durisala Desaiah: Lilly Research Laboratory, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA;
  3. Qi Zhang: Lilly Research Laboratory, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA;
  4. Michael E Thase: Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA;
  5. David G S Perahia: Lilly Research Centre, Windlesham, Surrey, UK; ; The Gordon Hospital, London, UK.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a significant public health concern and challenges health care providers to intervene with appropriate treatment. This article provides an overview of efficacy and safety information for duloxetine 60 mg/day in the treatment of MDD, including its effect on painful physical symptoms (PPS).
DESIGN: A literature search was conducted for articles and pooled analyses reporting information regarding the use of duloxetine 60 mg/day in placebo-controlled trials.
SETTING: Placebo-controlled, active-comparator, short- and long-term studies were reviewed.
PARTICIPANTS: Adult (≥18 years) patients with MDD.
MEASUREMENTS: Effect sizes for continuous outcome (change from baseline to endpoint) and categorical outcome (response and remission rates) were calculated using the primary measures of 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) or Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The Brief Pain Inventory and Visual Analogue Scales were used to assess improvements in PPS. Glass estimation method was used to calculate effect sizes, and numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated based on HAMD-17 and MADRS total scores for remission and response rates. Safety data were examined via the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and by mean changes in vital-sign measures.
RESULTS: Treatment with duloxetine was associated with small-to-moderate effect sizes in the range of 0.12 to 0.72 for response rate and 0.07 to 0.65 for remission rate. NNTs were in the range of 3 to 16 for response and 3 to 29 for remission. Statistically significant improvements (p≤0.05) were observed in duloxetine-treated patients compared to placebo-treated patients in PPS and quality of life. The safety profile of the 60-mg dose was consistent with duloxetine labeling, with the most commonly observed significant adverse events being nausea, dry mouth, diarrhea, dizziness, constipation, fatigue, and decreased appetite.
CONCLUSION: These results reinforce the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine 60 mg/day as an effective short- and long-term treatment for adults with MDD. The evidence of the independent analgesic effect of duloxetine 60 mg/day supports its use as a treatment for patients with PPS associated with depression. This review is limited by the fact that it included randomized clinical trials with different study designs. Furthermore, data from randomized controlled trials may not generalize well to real clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1993 Jan;8(1):23-33 [PMID: 8424846]
  2. J Biopharm Stat. 2011 May;21(3):371-92 [PMID: 21442514]
  3. J Psychiatr Res. 2005 Mar;39(2):161-72 [PMID: 15589564]
  4. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62 [PMID: 14399272]
  5. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1859-67 [PMID: 21838410]
  6. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):161-9 [PMID: 18408530]
  7. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Jun;210(3):331-6 [PMID: 20309528]
  8. Curr Drug Saf. 2008 May;3(2):132-42 [PMID: 18690991]
  9. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001 Dec;25(6):871-80 [PMID: 11750180]
  10. Eur Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;21(6):367-78 [PMID: 16697153]
  11. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;67(8):1232-9 [PMID: 16965201]
  12. Drug Saf. 2009;32(12):1159-73 [PMID: 19916583]
  13. Postgrad Med. 2008 Jul;120(2):111-8 [PMID: 18654076]
  14. Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;188:346-53 [PMID: 16582061]
  15. Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Oct;59(10):1121-30 [PMID: 18832497]
  16. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jan;86(1):102-6 [PMID: 9428860]
  17. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994 Apr;269(1):132-6 [PMID: 7513356]
  18. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Feb;23(2):401-16 [PMID: 17288694]
  19. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 Suppl 7:5-11 [PMID: 12755646]
  20. CNS Drugs. 2007;21(7):581-609 [PMID: 17579500]
  21. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Nov;24(11):3105-15 [PMID: 18828958]
  22. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jul;23(7):1605-14 [PMID: 17559755]
  23. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Aug;24(4):389-99 [PMID: 15232330]
  24. Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):53-61 [PMID: 12964171]
  25. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;26(6):587-94 [PMID: 17110815]
  26. Psychol Methods. 2003 Dec;8(4):448-67 [PMID: 14664682]
  27. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):328-35 [PMID: 12220799]
  28. Psychosomatics. 2005 Jul-Aug;46(4):345-54 [PMID: 16000678]
  29. Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Dec;59(12):1383-90 [PMID: 19033164]
  30. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;13(3):227-35 [PMID: 15728754]
  31. JAMA. 2009 May 27;301(20):2099-110 [PMID: 19470987]
  32. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 May;161(5):826-35 [PMID: 15121647]
  33. Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(7):481-92 [PMID: 17563128]
  34. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):617-27 [PMID: 15939839]
  35. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;63(8):694-9 [PMID: 12197449]
  36. J Psychiatr Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;36(6):383-90 [PMID: 12393307]
  37. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Feb;312(2):726-32 [PMID: 15494550]
  38. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2004;(420):21-7 [PMID: 15128384]
  39. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004 Nov;311(2):576-84 [PMID: 15254142]
  40. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;69(9):1383-92 [PMID: 19193339]
  41. Psychosom Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;66(1):17-22 [PMID: 14747633]
  42. Pharm Stat. 2008 Jul-Sep;7(3):215-25 [PMID: 17853425]
  43. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7(Suppl 1):3-7 [PMID: 21750622]
  44. Psychosomatics. 2008 May-Jun;49(3):191-8 [PMID: 18448772]
  45. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Jul;216(2):279-86 [PMID: 21336575]
  46. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998 Mar;136(2):190-7 [PMID: 9551776]
  47. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;68(11):1707-16 [PMID: 18052564]
  48. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;6(Suppl 1):12-6 [PMID: 16001092]
  49. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9 [PMID: 444788]
  50. Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;157(4 Suppl):1-45 [PMID: 10767867]
  51. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995 Mar;272(3):1067-75 [PMID: 7891317]
  52. J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Jun;40(4):328-36 [PMID: 16678205]
  53. Health Policy. 1992 Oct;22(3):307-19 [PMID: 10122730]
  54. J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Feb;40(2):161-7 [PMID: 10664922]
  55. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38 [PMID: 8080219]
  56. J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49 [PMID: 7183759]
  57. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2005 Jul;20(5):327-41 [PMID: 15912562]
  58. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;63(4):308-15 [PMID: 12000204]
  59. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jan;27(1):47-56 [PMID: 22241678]
  60. Psychol Med. 2010 Feb;40(2):239-51 [PMID: 19493369]
  61. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998 Jan 12;341(2-3):165-7 [PMID: 9543235]
  62. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Nov 10;163(20):2433-45 [PMID: 14609780]
  63. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1849-58 [PMID: 21838411]
  64. Biometrics. 1997 Sep;53(3):983-97 [PMID: 9333350]
  65. J Affect Disord. 2006 Jun;92(2-3):185-93 [PMID: 16516977]
  66. Eur Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;23(1):66-73 [PMID: 18164600]
  67. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 May;70(5):706-16 [PMID: 19552867]
  68. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;68(12):1921-30 [PMID: 18162024]
  69. J Affect Disord. 2002 Dec;72(3):227-36 [PMID: 12450639]
  70. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70 [PMID: 15589385]
  71. Int J Clin Pract. 2010 May;64(6):719-26 [PMID: 20345508]
  72. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;164(6):900-9 [PMID: 17541049]
  73. Int J Clin Pract. 2006 May;60(5):613-20 [PMID: 16700869]
  74. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Jan;2(1):A14 [PMID: 15670467]
  75. BMC Neurol. 2009 Feb 10;9:6 [PMID: 19208243]
  76. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 May;22(3):167-74 [PMID: 17414743]
  77. J Psychiatr Res. 2005 Jan;39(1):43-53 [PMID: 15504423]
  78. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Feb;27(1):28-34 [PMID: 17224709]
  79. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Mar;21(3):345-56 [PMID: 15811202]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0duloxetine60effectMDDtreatmentsafetymg/dayPPSpatientsresponseremission0depressivesignificanttrialssizesdisorderhealthefficacyinformationpainfulphysicalsymptomsuseshort-long-termoutcomeratescalculatedmeasuresRatingScaleDepressionHAMD-17MADRStotalusedimprovementsdataadverseeventsassociatedrangerate3observedqualitylifetolerabilityreviewrandomizedclinicalmajorOBJECTIVE:MajorpublicconcernchallengescareprovidersinterveneappropriatearticleprovidesoverviewincludingDESIGN:literaturesearchconductedarticlespooledanalysesreportingregardingplacebo-controlledSETTING:Placebo-controlledactive-comparatorstudiesreviewedPARTICIPANTS:Adult≥18yearsMEASUREMENTS:Effectcontinuouschangebaselineendpointcategoricalusingprimary17-itemHamiltonMontgomery-ÅsbergscoreBriefPainInventoryVisualAnalogueScalesassessGlassestimationmethodcalculatenumbersneededtreatNNTbasedscoresSafetyexaminedviaincidencetreatment-emergentmeanchangesvital-signRESULTS:Treatmentsmall-to-moderate12720765NNTs1629Statisticallyp≤005duloxetine-treatedcomparedplacebo-treatedprofile60-mgdoseconsistentlabelingcommonlynauseadrymouthdiarrheadizzinessconstipationfatiguedecreasedappetiteCONCLUSION:resultsreinforceeffectiveadultsevidenceindependentanalgesicsupportsdepressionlimitedfactincludeddifferentstudydesignsFurthermorecontrolledmaygeneralizewellrealpracticeEfficacymgdailydisorder:expertcommentarysize

Similar Articles

Cited By