Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching.

Heloísa Cursi Campos, Peter J Urcuioli, Melissa Swisher
Author Information
  1. Heloísa Cursi Campos: University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

Pigeons demonstrate associative symmetry after successive matching training on one arbitrary and two identity relations (e.g., Urcuioli, 2008). Here, we tested whether identity matching training is necessary for this emergent effect. In Experiment 1, one group of pigeons (Dual Oddity) learned hue-form arbitrary matching and two oddity relations which shared sample and comparison elements with the arbitrary relations. A second (Control) group learned the same hue-form matching task and a second (form-hue) arbitrary task which, together with hue oddity, shared only the samples with the hue-form relations. On subsequent symmetry probe trials, four Dual Oddity pigeons exhibited higher probe-trial response rates on the reverse of the positive than negative hue-form baseline trials, demonstrating associative symmetry. None of the Control pigeons, on the other hand, exhibited associative symmetry. Experiment 2 showed that subsequently changing one of the two oddity baseline relations to identity matching in the Dual Oddity group yielded antisymmetry in three of five pigeons. These results are consistent with predictions derived from Urcuioli's (Urcuioli, 2008) theory of pigeons' stimulus class formation and demonstrate that identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry to emerge after arbitrary matching training in pigeons.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):235-51 [PMID: 9821678]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):405-45 [PMID: 16812256]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):173-82 [PMID: 1645099]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23-44 [PMID: 7057127]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):7-17 [PMID: 16811491]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):267-82 [PMID: 21541171]
  7. Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):188-203 [PMID: 19380896]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):385-92 [PMID: 16812585]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jan;97(1):5-27 [PMID: 22287802]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):243-57 [PMID: 3805973]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45 [PMID: 16812849]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82 [PMID: 19070336]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Nov;98(3):283-93 [PMID: 23144506]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):147-65 [PMID: 16262184]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):297-304 [PMID: 3711776]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22 [PMID: 7057129]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):283-95 [PMID: 21541172]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  19. Psychol Rep. 1991 Feb;68(1):51-60 [PMID: 2034778]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Nov;96(3):329-41 [PMID: 22084494]
  21. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Nov;96(3):417-26 [PMID: 22084498]

Grants

  1. R01 HD061322/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Association Learning
Color Perception
Columbidae
Concept Formation
Conditioning, Classical
Discrimination Learning
Generalization, Stimulus
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Practice, Psychological
Retention, Psychology
Reversal Learning

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0matchingsymmetryassociativepigeonstrainingarbitraryidentityrelationshue-formsuccessiveonetwonecessarygroupDualOddityodditystimulusdemonstrateUrcuioli2008ExperimentlearnedsharedsecondControltasktrialsexhibitedbaselineantisymmetryPigeonsegtestedwhetheremergenteffect1samplecomparisonelementsform-huetogetherhuesamplessubsequentprobefourhigherprobe-trialresponseratesreversepositivenegativedemonstratingNonehand2showedsubsequentlychangingyieldedthreefiveresultsconsistentpredictionsderivedUrcuioli'stheorypigeons'classformationemergeConcurrentkeypeckclassesequivalence

Similar Articles

Cited By