Comparing Iconic Memory in Children with and without Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Nastaran Ahmadi, Mohammad Ali Goodarzi, Habib Hadianfard, Norolah Mohamadi, Daryush Farid, Golrasteh Kholasehzadeh, Mohammad Nadi Sakhvidi, Camellia Hemyari
Author Information
  1. Nastaran Ahmadi: Psychiatry and Psychology Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  2. Mohammad Ali Goodarzi: Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  3. Habib Hadianfard: Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  4. Norolah Mohamadi: Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  5. Daryush Farid: Department of Business Management, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
  6. Golrasteh Kholasehzadeh: Department of Psychiatry, Shaheed Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
  7. Mohammad Nadi Sakhvidi: Department of Psychiatry, Shaheed Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
  8. Camellia Hemyari: Research Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Shiraz, University for Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) do not process most information due to inattention and loss of the opportunity to save and retrieve information. Therefore, these children experience memory impairment. Although visual memory has been previously studied in children with ADHD, iconic memory in these children has been less evaluated. We aimed to study the possibility of iconic memory impairment in children with ADHD, and compare the results with that of children without ADHD.
METHODS: The experimental group of this study were 6-9 year-old children who referred to the Imam Hosein Clinic and were diagnosed as having ADHD by a psychiatrist during 2011-2012 (n = 30).The subjects were interviewed clinically by a psychologist; and in order to diagnose ADHD, their parents and teachers were asked to complete the child symptom inventory-4 (CSI-4). The comparison group were 6-9 year-old children without ADHD who studied in 1st and 2nd educational district of Yazd (n = 30). Subjects' iconic memory was assessed using an iconic memory task. Repeated measure ANOVA was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: Based on the iconic memory test, the mean score of ADHD children was significantly lower than that of children without ADHD (P < 0.001). Moreover, the performance of the experimental group differed significantly when the duration of the presentation differed from 50 ms to 100 ms as compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The number of correct answers increased in the experimental group as the duration of presentation increased. However, children with ADHD scored less than children without ADHD at 50 ms as well as 100 ms. The means of ADHD children increased as the duration of the presentation increased from 50 ms to 100 ms to 300 ms (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Visual memory is weaker in children with ADHD, and they have weaker performance than normal children in both visual and auditory symbols at presentation durations of 50 and 100 ms. The performance of ADHD children improves as the stimulation time increases.

Keywords

References

  1. Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):122-35 [PMID: 15010244]
  2. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;44(4):377-84 [PMID: 15782085]
  3. Curr Drug Targets. 2001 Dec;2(4):347-52 [PMID: 11732636]
  4. Behav Brain Res. 2005 Nov 30;165(1):1-11 [PMID: 16213034]
  5. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;34(7):886-96 [PMID: 7649959]
  6. J Clin Psychol. 1992 May;48(3):371-8 [PMID: 1602028]
  7. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Aug;36(6):903-13 [PMID: 18288603]
  8. Child Neuropsychol. 2001 Sep;7(3):162-71 [PMID: 12187473]
  9. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Aug;36(6):825-37 [PMID: 18317920]
  10. J Psychiatr Res. 2008 Oct;42(13):1060-7 [PMID: 18226818]
  11. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;43(3):260-8 [PMID: 15076258]
  12. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Nov 15;60(10):1039-45 [PMID: 16876143]
  13. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;45(5):912-26 [PMID: 15225335]
  14. Psychol Med. 2005 Oct;35(10):1433-43 [PMID: 16164767]
  15. Brain Dev. 2007 Aug;29(7):400-8 [PMID: 17207595]
  16. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 Jun;20(4):443-56 [PMID: 15896559]
  17. Psychiatry Res. 1998 Aug 17;80(2):165-76 [PMID: 9754696]
  18. Dev Psychol. 1998 Sep;34(5):956-969 [PMID: 9779742]
  19. Percept Psychophys. 2005 Nov;67(8):1332-43 [PMID: 16555585]
  20. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1996 Apr;21(3):313-22 [PMID: 8817729]
  21. Int J Neurosci. 2004 Feb;114(2):273-87 [PMID: 14702216]
  22. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Jan;33(1):1-24 [PMID: 7731533]
  23. Br J Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;23(4):487-505 [PMID: 21214590]
  24. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2006 Dec;16(6):653-65 [PMID: 17127571]
  25. Behav Brain Funct. 2006 Dec 15;2:43 [PMID: 17173676]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ADHDchildrenmemorymsiconicwithoutgrouppresentation50100increasedexperimentalP<0001performancedurationsymbolsIconicChildreninformationimpairmentvisualstudiedlessstudy6-9year-oldn=30testsignificantlydifferedVisualweakerOBJECTIVE:attentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderprocessdueinattentionlossopportunitysaveretrieveThereforeexperienceAlthoughpreviouslyevaluatedaimedpossibilitycompareresultsMETHODS:referredImamHoseinClinicdiagnosedpsychiatrist2011-2012Thesubjectsinterviewedclinicallypsychologistorderdiagnoseparentsteachersaskedcompletechildsymptominventory-4CSI-4comparison1st2ndeducationaldistrictYazdSubjects'assessedusingtaskRepeatedmeasureANOVAuseddataanalysisRESULTS:BasedmeanscorelowerMoreovercomparedcontrolnumbercorrectanswersHoweverscoredwellmeans300CONCLUSION:normalauditorydurationsimprovesstimulationtimeincreasesComparingMemoryAttentionDeficitHyperactivityDisorderAuditory

Similar Articles

Cited By