One-degree-of-freedom spherical model for the passive motion of the human ankle joint.

Nicola Sancisi, Benedetta Baldisserri, Vincenzo Parenti-Castelli, Claudio Belvedere, Alberto Leardini
Author Information
  1. Nicola Sancisi: DIN-Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 2, 40136, Bologna, Italy, nicola.sancisi@unibo.it.

Abstract

Mathematical modelling of mobility at the human ankle joint is essential for prosthetics and orthotic design. The scope of this study is to show that the ankle joint passive motion can be represented by a one-degree-of-freedom spherical motion. Moreover, this motion is modelled by a one-degree-of-freedom spherical parallel mechanism model, and the optimal pivot-point position is determined. Passive motion and anatomical data were taken from in vitro experiments in nine lower limb specimens. For each of these, a spherical mechanism, including the tibiofibular and talocalcaneal segments connected by a spherical pair and by the calcaneofibular and tibiocalcaneal ligament links, was defined from the corresponding experimental kinematics and geometry. An iterative procedure was used to optimize the geometry of the model, able to predict original experimental motion. The results of the simulations showed a good replication of the original natural motion, despite the numerous model assumptions and simplifications, with mean differences between experiments and predictions smaller than 1.3 mm (average 0.33 mm) for the three joint position components and smaller than 0.7° (average 0.32°) for the two out-of-sagittal plane rotations, once plotted versus the full flexion arc. The relevant pivot-point position after model optimization was found within the tibial mortise, but not exactly in a central location. The present combined experimental and modelling analysis of passive motion at the human ankle joint shows that a one degree-of-freedom spherical mechanism predicts well what is observed in real joints, although its computational complexity is comparable to the standard hinge joint model.

References

  1. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2011 Aug;225(8):725-35 [PMID: 21922950]
  2. Foot Ankle Int. 2000 Apr;21(4):278-84 [PMID: 10808966]
  3. J Biomech. 2004 Dec;37(12):1823-9 [PMID: 15519590]
  4. J Biomech. 1982;15(9):627-34 [PMID: 7174695]
  5. J Biomech. 2006;39(11):2087-95 [PMID: 16085076]
  6. J Biomech. 2002 Apr;35(4):543-8 [PMID: 11934426]
  7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Jul-Aug;(118):82-92 [PMID: 954296]
  8. J Biomech. 2001 Jun;34(6):805-9 [PMID: 11470119]
  9. J Biomech. 1999 Jun;32(6):585-91 [PMID: 10332622]
  10. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Nov;47(11):1207-17 [PMID: 19730914]
  11. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2007 Mar;45(3):305-13 [PMID: 17295023]
  12. J Biomech. 1999 Feb;32(2):111-8 [PMID: 10052915]
  13. J Biomech. 2009 Jul 22;42(10):1403-1408 [PMID: 19524926]
  14. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Aug;15(8):985-93 [PMID: 17431587]
  15. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2012 Feb;226(2):146-60 [PMID: 22468466]
  16. J Biomech. 2003 Mar;36(3):363-72 [PMID: 12594984]
  17. J Biomed Eng. 1985 Apr;7(2):137-43 [PMID: 3999724]
  18. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;(127):189-96 [PMID: 912978]
  19. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Jan;71(1):94-9 [PMID: 2915016]
  20. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Feb;38(2):269-79 [PMID: 19957039]
  21. J Biomech. 2005 Jun;38(6):1205-12 [PMID: 15863104]
  22. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224(9):1121-32 [PMID: 21053776]

MeSH Term

Ankle Joint
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Models, Biological
Range of Motion, Articular
Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0motionjointsphericalmodelanklehumanpassivemechanismpositionexperimental0modellingone-degree-of-freedompivot-pointexperimentsgeometryoriginalsmalleraverageMathematicalmobilityessentialprostheticsorthoticdesignscopestudyshowcanrepresentedMoreovermodelledparalleloptimaldeterminedPassiveanatomicaldatatakenvitroninelowerlimbspecimensincludingtibiofibulartalocalcanealsegmentsconnectedpaircalcaneofibulartibiocalcanealligamentlinksdefinedcorrespondingkinematicsiterativeprocedureusedoptimizeablepredictresultssimulationsshowedgoodreplicationnaturaldespitenumerousassumptionssimplificationsmeandifferencespredictions13 mm33 mmthreecomponents32°twoout-of-sagittalplanerotationsplottedversusfullflexionarcrelevantoptimizationfoundwithintibialmortiseexactlycentrallocationpresentcombinedanalysisshowsonedegree-of-freedompredictswellobservedrealjointsalthoughcomputationalcomplexitycomparablestandardhingeOne-degree-of-freedom

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)