OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
The open nursing journal
2014;8 1-7.

Characterisation of cancer support and rehabilitation programmes: a Swedish multiple case study.

Linda Berg, Margaretha Jenholt Nolbris, Ingalill Koinberg, Christina Melin-Johansson, Anders Möller, Joakim Ohlén
Author Information
  1. Linda Berg: Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE 40530, Sweden.
  2. Margaretha Jenholt Nolbris: Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE 40530, Sweden.
  3. Ingalill Koinberg: Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE 40530, Sweden.
  4. Christina Melin-Johansson: Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE 40530, Sweden.
  5. Anders Möller: Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE 40530, Sweden.
  6. Joakim Ohlén: Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE 40530, Sweden.
PMID: 24478809 DOI: 10.2174/1874434601408010001

Abstract

cancer support and rehabilitation are suggested to be an integral part of cancer care strategies. This study focuses on comparativeness of cancer support and rehabilitation programmes. The aim of this study was to analyse available cancer support and rehabilitation programmes in Sweden presented as complementary to cancer rehabilitation at cancer clinics. A multiple case study design was chosen in order to inquire the small number of existing supportive and rehabilitative cancer programmes. Based on the structures, processes and outcomes of the nine included programmes, three types of cancer support and rehabilitation programmes were identified: multimodal rehabilitation, comprehensive cancer support and art therapy. cancer support and rehabilitation programmes offer a variety of activities and therapies which are highly valuable and relevant for people with cancer. The typology of cancer support and rehabilitation programmes and comparability between programmes need further inquiry.

Keywords

Cancer cancer programme case study rehabilitation support.

References

  1. Acta Oncol. 1998;37(3):269-75 [PMID: 9677099]
  2. J Adv Nurs. 2007 May;58(3):236-45 [PMID: 17474912]
  3. Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):475-9 [PMID: 22144087]
  4. Acta Oncol. 1993;32(1):15-21 [PMID: 8466758]
  5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD007730 [PMID: 23543556]
  6. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70 [PMID: 6880820]
  7. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010 Apr;36(2):185-94 [PMID: 19962830]
  8. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Apr;17(4):333-7 [PMID: 19148685]
  9. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Feb;15(1):12-5 [PMID: 20584626]
  10. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jun;20(6):1121-33 [PMID: 22258414]
  11. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 May;90(5 Suppl 1):S27-37 [PMID: 21765261]
  12. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2012 Feb;28(1):45-54 [PMID: 22281309]
  13. Acta Oncol. 2012 Feb;51(2):198-207 [PMID: 21923569]
  14. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 Jan;39(1):76-87 [PMID: 22422040]
  15. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(4):216-21 [PMID: 18792854]
  16. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;4(1):19-23 [PMID: 7075951]
  17. J Psychosom Res. 2005 Jun;58(6):485-96 [PMID: 16125515]
  18. Cancer Nurs. 1990 Feb;13(1):2-12 [PMID: 2407338]
  19. Support Care Cancer. 2003 Dec;11(12):763-8 [PMID: 14564493]
  20. BMC Cancer. 2010 Jul 01;10:345 [PMID: 20594347]
  21. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(1):47-55 [PMID: 17926146]
  22. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Mar;27(3):169-74 [PMID: 11242722]
  23. Br J Cancer. 2011 Nov 8;105 Suppl 1:S52-73 [PMID: 22048034]
  24. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:401867 [PMID: 22203871]
  25. Semin Oncol. 2011 Jun;38(3):386-93 [PMID: 21600368]
  26. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 10;26(23):3824-31 [PMID: 18688048]
  27. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Jun;7(2):237-46 [PMID: 23443319]
  28. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;(8):CD008465 [PMID: 22895974]
  29. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208 [PMID: 10109801]
  30. J Psychosom Res. 2009 Nov;67(5):403-15 [PMID: 19837203]
  31. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Mar;49(3):285-92 [PMID: 12642201]
  32. JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8 [PMID: 3045356]
  33. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(4):441-5 [PMID: 17497310]
  34. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2008 Aug;22(4):671-82, viii-ix [PMID: 18638695]
  35. Acta Oncol. 2011 Feb;50(2):179-86 [PMID: 21231779]
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cancerrehabilitationsupportprogrammesstudyCancercasemultiplesuggestedintegralpartcarestrategiesfocusescomparativenessaimanalyseavailableSwedenpresentedcomplementaryclinicsdesignchosenorderinquiresmallnumberexistingsupportiverehabilitativeBasedstructuresprocessesoutcomesnineincludedthreetypesidentified:multimodalcomprehensivearttherapyoffervarietyactivitiestherapieshighlyvaluablerelevantpeopletypologycomparabilityneedinquiryCharacterisationprogrammes:Swedishprogramme

Similar Articles

Cited By