Cannibalism in invasive, native and biocontrol populations of the harlequin ladybird.

Ashraf Tayeh, Arnaud Estoup, Eric Lombaert, Thomas Guillemaud, Natalia Kirichenko, Lori Lawson-Handley, Patrick De Clercq, Benoît Facon
Author Information
  1. Ashraf Tayeh: INRA, UMR, 1062, CBGP Montpellier, France. tayeh@supagro.inra.fr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cannibalism is widespread in both vertebrates and invertebrates but its extent is variable between and within species. Cannibalism depends on population density and nutritional conditions, and could be beneficial during colonisation of new environments. Empirical studies are needed to determine whether this trait might facilitate invasion of a new area in natural systems. We investigated whether the propensity for cannibalism in H. axyridis differs both between native and invasive populations and between invasive populations from the core and from the front of the invasive area in Western Europe. We also compared the propensity for cannibalism of these natural populations with that of laboratory-reared biocontrol populations. We measured the cannibalism rates of eggs by first instar larvae and adult females at two different individual densities of ladybirds from three types of population (invasive, native and biocontrol), in laboratory-controlled conditions.
RESULTS: Cannibalism was significantly greater in larvae from invasive populations compared to native or biocontrol populations, but there was no difference in cannibalism rates between populations from the core or front of the invaded range. Cannibalism was significantly lower in larvae from biocontrol populations compared to wild (invasive and native) populations. No differences in cannibalism rates of adult females were found between any populations. While high population density significantly increased cannibalism in both larvae and adults, the norm of reaction of cannibalism to individual density did not change significantly during the invasion and/or laboratory rearing processes.
CONCLUSION: This study is the first to provide evidence for a higher propensity for cannibalism in invasive populations compared to native ones. Our experiments also shed light on the difference in cannibalism evolution with respect to life stages. However, we are still at an early stage in understanding the underlying mechanisms and several different research perspectives are needed to determine whether the higher propensity for cannibalism is a general feature of the invasion process.

References

  1. J Evol Biol. 2011 Oct;24(10):2164-72 [PMID: 21745250]
  2. Am Nat. 2010 May;175(5):513-24 [PMID: 20302421]
  3. J Anim Ecol. 2006 Jan;75(1):288-97 [PMID: 16903066]
  4. J Evol Biol. 2011 May;24(5):1044-52 [PMID: 21342302]
  5. Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Mar;82 ( Pt 3):267-75 [PMID: 10341438]
  6. Am Nat. 2007 Dec;170(6):886-901 [PMID: 18171171]
  7. PLoS One. 2010 Mar 17;5(3):e9743 [PMID: 20305822]
  8. Evol Appl. 2011 Jan;4(1):71-88 [PMID: 25567954]
  9. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16 [PMID: 5875341]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Dec;73(12):4604-7 [PMID: 1070012]
  11. Evolution. 2011 Sep;65(9):2481-91 [PMID: 21884051]
  12. Evol Appl. 2012 Jul;5(5):481-8 [PMID: 22949923]
  13. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24749 [PMID: 21935453]
  14. Oecologia. 2010 Jun;163(2):313-22 [PMID: 20049478]
  15. Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1255-61 [PMID: 9632508]
  16. Mol Ecol. 2011 Nov;20(22):4654-70 [PMID: 22004292]

MeSH Term

Animals
Biological Control Agents
Cannibalism
Coleoptera
Environment
Europe
Female
Introduced Species
Larva
Population Dynamics

Chemicals

Biological Control Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0populationscannibalisminvasivenativeCannibalismbiocontrolpropensitycomparedlarvaesignificantlypopulationdensitywhetherinvasionratesconditionsnewneededdetermineareanaturalcorefrontalsofirstadultfemalesdifferentindividualdifferencehigherBACKGROUND:widespreadvertebratesinvertebratesextentvariablewithinspeciesdependsnutritionalbeneficialcolonisationenvironmentsEmpiricalstudiestraitmightfacilitatesystemsinvestigatedHaxyridisdiffersWesternEuropelaboratory-rearedmeasuredeggsinstartwodensitiesladybirdsthreetypeslaboratory-controlledRESULTS:greaterinvadedrangelowerwilddifferencesfoundhighincreasedadultsnormreactionchangeand/orlaboratoryrearingprocessesCONCLUSION:studyprovideevidenceonesexperimentsshedlightevolutionrespectlifestagesHoweverstillearlystageunderstandingunderlyingmechanismsseveralresearchperspectivesgeneralfeatureprocessharlequinladybird

Similar Articles

Cited By