Confirmatory factor analysis of the Early Arithmetic, Reading, and Learning Indicators (EARLI).

Kate E Norwalk, James Clyde DiPerna, Pui-Wa Lei
Author Information
  1. Kate E Norwalk: Department of Educational and School Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: norwke43@gmail.com.
  2. James Clyde DiPerna: Department of Educational Psychology, School Psychology, and Special Education, The Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: jcd12@psu.edu.
  3. Pui-Wa Lei: Department of Educational Psychology, School Psychology, and Special Education, The Pennsylvania State University, USA. Electronic address: puiwa@psu.edu.

Abstract

Despite growing interest in early intervention, there are few measures available to monitor the progress of early academic skills in preschoolers. The Early Arithmetic, Reading, and Learning Indicators (EARLI; DiPerna, Morgan, & Lei, 2007) were developed as brief assessments of critical early literacy and numeracy skills. The purpose of the current study was to examine the factor structure of the EARLI probes via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in a sample of Head Start preschoolers (N=289). A two-factor model with correlated error terms and a bifactor model provided comparable fit to the data, although there were some structural problems with the latter model. The utility of the bifactor model for explaining the structure of early academic skills as well as the utility of the EARLI probes as measures of literacy and numeracy skills in preschool are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2009;15(1):60-8 [PMID: 19213011]
  2. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2002 Apr 1;33(2):84-101 [PMID: 27764468]
  3. Topics Early Child Spec Educ. 2008 May 1;28(1):3-17 [PMID: 26038613]
  4. Dev Psychol. 2009 May;45(3):850-67 [PMID: 19413436]
  5. Learn Individ Differ. 2010 Apr 1;20(2):82-88 [PMID: 20401327]
  6. Behav Res Ther. 2003 Dec;41(12):1411-26 [PMID: 14583411]
  7. Read Writ. 2010 Jul 1;23(6):607-626 [PMID: 20563245]
  8. Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):934-47 [PMID: 12428705]
  9. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;9 Suppl 2:II11-6 [PMID: 11138899]
  10. Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(3):205-28 [PMID: 18473197]
  11. Am Psychol. 1995 Jan;50(1):24-37 [PMID: 7872578]
  12. J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 May;82(1):65-92 [PMID: 12081460]
  13. Cognition. 2003 May;88(1):49-78 [PMID: 12711153]
  14. Dev Psychol. 2007 Jul;43(4):947-59 [PMID: 17605527]
  15. Learn Individ Differ. 2008 3rd Quarter;18(3):316-328 [PMID: 26347390]
  16. Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):934-45 [PMID: 9383616]
  17. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Dec;110(4):647-58 [PMID: 21831396]
  18. Dev Psychol. 2000 Sep;36(5):596-613 [PMID: 10976600]
  19. J Learn Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;42(2):133-47 [PMID: 19074622]
  20. J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):62-76 [PMID: 19822699]

Grants

  1. T32 HD007376/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Child, Preschool
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Language
Learning
Male
Mathematics
Reading

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EARLIearlyskillsEarlymodelliteracynumeracyfactormeasuresacademicpreschoolersArithmeticReadingLearningIndicatorsstructureprobesanalysisbifactorutilityDespitegrowinginterestinterventionavailablemonitorprogressDiPernaMorgan&Lei2007developedbriefassessmentscriticalpurposecurrentstudyexamineviaconfirmatoryCFAsampleHeadStartN=289two-factorcorrelatederrortermsprovidedcomparablefitdataalthoughstructuralproblemslatterexplainingwellpreschooldiscussedConfirmatoryPreschool

Similar Articles

Cited By