Interviewing to develop Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures for clinical research: eliciting patients' experience.

Anne Brédart, Alexia Marrel, Linda Abetz-Webb, Kathy Lasch, Catherine Acquadro
Author Information
  1. Catherine Acquadro: Mapi Research Trust, 27 rue de la Villette, 69003 Lyon, France. cacquadro@mapigroup.com.

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures must provide evidence that their development followed a rigorous process for ensuring their content validity. To this end, the collection of data is performed through qualitative interviews that allow for the elicitation of in-depth spontaneous reports of the patients' experiences with their condition and/or its treatment. This paper provides a review of qualitative research applied to PRO measure development. A clear definition of what is a qualitative research interview is given as well as information about the form and content of qualitative interviews required for developing PRO measures. Particular attention is paid to the description of interviewing approaches (e.g., semi-structured and in-depth interviews, individual vs. focus group interviews). Information about how to get prepared for a qualitative interview is provided with the description of how to develop discussion guides for exploratory or cognitive interviews. Interviewing patients to obtain knowledge regarding their illness experience requires interpersonal and communication skills to facilitate patients' expression. Those skills are described in details, as well as the skills needed to facilitate focus groups and to interview children, adolescents and the elderly. Special attention is also given to quality assurance and interview training. The paper ends on ethical considerations since interviewing for the development of PROs is performed in a context of illness and vulnerability. Therefore, it is all the more important that, in addition to soliciting informed consent, respectful interactions be ensured throughout the interview process.

References

  1. J Child Neurol. 2011 Nov;26(11):1365-76 [PMID: 21636777]
  2. Med Educ. 2005 Jul;39(7):742-50 [PMID: 15960795]
  3. Qual Life Res. 2010 Oct;19(8):1087-96 [PMID: 20512662]
  4. BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302 [PMID: 7633241]
  5. Sociol Health Illn. 2010 Nov;32(7):1059-71 [PMID: 20942822]
  6. Med Educ. 2006 Apr;40(4):314-21 [PMID: 16573666]
  7. Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S66-75 [PMID: 17995476]
  8. BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):251-3 [PMID: 7627048]
  9. Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):967-77 [PMID: 22152165]
  10. Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Dec;34(12):1053-5 [PMID: 16333490]
  11. Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88 [PMID: 22152166]
  12. Qual Life Res. 2009 Nov;18(9):1263-78 [PMID: 19784865]
  13. Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1075-83 [PMID: 19804437]
  14. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1250-60 [PMID: 17027985]
  15. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Feb;45(3):347-53 [PMID: 19013787]
  16. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Mar;9(3):222-7 [PMID: 10728107]
  17. Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1372-80 [PMID: 18000076]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(8):2091-104 [PMID: 16797811]
  19. BMJ. 1995 Jul 15;311(6998):182-4 [PMID: 7613435]
  20. Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):19-27 [PMID: 21319481]
  21. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Mar;82(3):384-8 [PMID: 21242048]
  22. Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):219-27 [PMID: 12769134]
  23. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(5):363-70 [PMID: 18429654]
  24. Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):229-38 [PMID: 12769135]
  25. Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1736-43 [PMID: 20671302]
  26. BMJ. 2008 Aug 07;337:a1035 [PMID: 18687726]
  27. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79 [PMID: 17034633]
  28. Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S125-37 [PMID: 17995471]
  29. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Nov 09;8:73 [PMID: 18992167]

MeSH Term

Age Factors
Communication
Focus Groups
Guidelines as Topic
Health Services Research
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Patient Preference
Patients
Professional-Patient Relations
Qualitative Research
Self Report
Sex Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0qualitativeinterviewsinterviewPROmeasuresdevelopmentpatients'skillsprocesscontentperformedin-depthpaperresearchgivenwellattentiondescriptioninterviewingfocusdevelopInterviewingillnessexperiencefacilitatePatient-reportedoutcomemustprovideevidencefollowedrigorousensuringvalidityendcollectiondataallowelicitationspontaneousreportsexperiencesconditionand/ortreatmentprovidesreviewappliedmeasurecleardefinitioninformationformrequireddevelopingParticularpaidapproachesegsemi-structuredindividualvsgroupInformationgetpreparedprovideddiscussionguidesexploratorycognitivepatientsobtainknowledgeregardingrequiresinterpersonalcommunicationexpressiondescribeddetailsneededgroupschildrenadolescentselderlySpecialalsoqualityassurancetrainingendsethicalconsiderationssincePROscontextvulnerabilityThereforeimportantadditionsolicitinginformedconsentrespectfulinteractionsensuredthroughoutPatient-ReportedOutcomeclinicalresearch:eliciting

Similar Articles

Cited By