"Limits of control"--crucial parameters for a reliable quantification of viable campylobacter by real-time PCR.

Nora-Johanna Krüger, Christiane Buhler, Azuka N Iwobi, Ingrid Huber, Lüppo Ellerbroek, Bernd Appel, Kerstin Stingl
Author Information
  1. Nora-Johanna Krüger: National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
  2. Christiane Buhler: National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
  3. Azuka N Iwobi: Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
  4. Ingrid Huber: Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
  5. Lüppo Ellerbroek: National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
  6. Bernd Appel: National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
  7. Kerstin Stingl: National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

The unsuitability of the "CFU" parameter and the usefulness of cultivation-independent quantification of Campylobacter on chicken products, reflecting the actual risk for infection, is increasingly becoming obvious. Recently, real-time PCR methods in combination with the use of DNA intercalators, which block DNA amplification from dead bacteria, have seen wide application. However, much confusion exists in the correct interpretation of such assays. Campylobacter is confronted by oxidative and cold stress outside the intestine. Hence, damage caused by oxidative stress probably represents the most frequent natural death of Campylobacter on food products. Treatment of Campylobacter with peroxide led to complete loss of CFU and to significant entry of any tested DNA intercalator, indicating disruption of membrane integrity. When we transiently altered the metabolic state of Campylobacter by abolishing the proton-motive force or by inhibiting active efflux, CFU was constant but enhanced entry of ethidium bromide (EtBr) was observed. Consistently, ethidium monoazide (EMA) also entered viable Campylobacter, in particular when nutrients for bacterial energization were lacking (in PBS) or when the cells were less metabolically active (in stationary phase). In contrast, propidium iodide (PI) and propidium monoazide (PMA) were excluded from viable bacterial cells, irrespective of their metabolic state. As expected for a diffusion-limited process, the extent of signal reduction from dead cells depended on the temperature, incubation time and concentration of the dyes during staining, prior to crosslinking. Consistently, free protein and/or DNA present in varying amounts in the heterogeneous matrix lowered the concentration of the DNA dyes at the bacterial membrane and led to considerable variation of the residual signal from dead cells. In conclusion, we propose an improved approach, taking into account principles of method variability and recommend the implementation of process sample controls for reliable quantification of intact and potentially infectious units (IPIU) of Campylobacter by real-time PCR.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45343 [PMID: 23049787]
  2. Res Microbiol. 2007 Jun;158(5):405-12 [PMID: 17449228]
  3. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2012 Mar;2(1):88-96 [PMID: 24611125]
  4. J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Apr;93(1):20-4 [PMID: 23389080]
  5. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Aug;76(15):5097-104 [PMID: 20562292]
  6. J Microbiol Methods. 2000 Sep;42(1):97-114 [PMID: 11000436]
  7. J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Oct;95(1):32-8 [PMID: 23811205]
  8. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Sep;69(9):5664-9 [PMID: 12957958]
  9. J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Oct;105(4):1178-85 [PMID: 18624747]
  10. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Sep;56(3):491-7 [PMID: 16055509]
  11. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Dec;5(12):4891-903 [PMID: 745997]
  12. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jun;70(6):3588-92 [PMID: 15184161]
  13. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Apr;77(7):2531-3 [PMID: 21317266]
  14. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Jan;89(2):407-17 [PMID: 20967442]
  15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Feb;71(2):1018-24 [PMID: 15691961]
  16. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 May;48(5):633-8 [PMID: 19416465]
  17. J Microbiol Methods. 2012 Nov;91(2):276-89 [PMID: 22940102]
  18. Biotechniques. 2003 Apr;34(4):804-8, 810, 812-3 [PMID: 12703305]
  19. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 May 31;131(2-3):197-202 [PMID: 19324444]
  20. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2011 Aug;26(4):253-61 [PMID: 21729246]
  21. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010 Mar;63(2):119-23 [PMID: 20332575]

MeSH Term

Animals
Azides
Campylobacter
Chickens
Colony Count, Microbial
DNA, Bacterial
Microbial Viability
Poultry
Propidium
Proton-Motive Force
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Chemicals

Azides
DNA, Bacterial
propidium monoazide
Propidium
8-azidoethidium

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CampylobacterDNAcellsquantificationreal-timePCRdeadviablebacterialproductsoxidativestressledCFUentrymembranemetabolicstateactiveethidiumConsistentlymonoazidepropidiumprocesssignalconcentrationdyesreliableunsuitability"CFU"parameterusefulnesscultivation-independentchickenreflectingactualriskinfectionincreasinglybecomingobviousRecentlymethodscombinationuseintercalatorsblockamplificationbacteriaseenwideapplicationHowevermuchconfusionexistscorrectinterpretationassaysconfrontedcoldoutsideintestineHencedamagecausedprobablyrepresentsfrequentnaturaldeathfoodTreatmentperoxidecompletelosssignificanttestedintercalatorindicatingdisruptionintegritytransientlyalteredabolishingproton-motiveforceinhibitingeffluxconstantenhancedbromideEtBrobservedEMAalsoenteredparticularnutrientsenergizationlackingPBSlessmetabolicallystationaryphasecontrastiodidePIPMAexcludedirrespectiveexpecteddiffusion-limitedextentreductiondependedtemperatureincubationtimestainingpriorcrosslinkingfreeproteinand/orpresentvaryingamountsheterogeneousmatrixloweredconsiderablevariationresidualconclusionproposeimprovedapproachtakingaccountprinciplesmethodvariabilityrecommendimplementationsamplecontrolsintactpotentiallyinfectiousunitsIPIU"Limitscontrol"--crucialparameterscampylobacter

Similar Articles

Cited By