Body image and weight perceptions in relation to actual measurements by means of a new index and level of physical activity in Italian university students.

Luciana Zaccagni, Sabrina Masotti, Roberta Donati, Gianni Mazzoni, Emanuela Gualdi-Russo
Author Information
  1. Sabrina Masotti: Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Corso Ercole I d'Este 32, 44121 Ferrara, Italy. sabrina.masotti@unife.it.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Body image perception depends on anthropometric and psychological factors. Body dissatisfaction is influenced by the socio-cultural environment and is associated with eating disorders and low self-esteem. This study examined the body image perception, the degree of dissatisfaction and the weight status perception inconsistency in relation to sex, weight status and amount of physical activity in a sample of university students.
METHODS: The participants were 734 university students (354 females aged 21.5 ± 2.9 yrs and 380 males aged 22.1 ± 3.6 yrs) recruited from the second year of the Sport Sciences degree program. A self-administered questionnaire was used to acquire socio-demographic and sport participation information. Height, weight, BMI and weight status were considered for each subject. Body image perception was assessed by a silhouette matching technique. A new index, FAI (Feel status minus Actual status Inconsistency), was used to assess weight status perception inconsistency.
RESULTS: A large proportion of the sample had normal weight status. On average, females chose as feel status a significantly higher figure than the males (4.7 versus 3.8) and they would have liked to have a significantly thinner figure than the males (3.4 versus 3.6). Therefore, the mean FID (Feel minus Ideal Discrepancy) values (positive in both sexes) were significantly higher in females than in males, meaning higher dissatisfaction. The mean FAI values were positive in females and negative in males, indicating a tendency of the women to overestimate their weight status and of the men to underestimate it. Men were more physically active than women. Less active women showed significantly lower body weight and BMI than more active women. Men less engaged in physical activity showed significantly higher FID than more active men.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show greater dissatisfaction and higher weight status perception consistency in females than in males among Italian university students examined. Our findings suggest that the FAI index can be very useful to evaluate the perceived weight status by body image in comparison to actual weight status assessed anthropometrically.

References

  1. J Pers Assess. 2001 Feb;76(1):90-106 [PMID: 11206302]
  2. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Dec;97(12):1608-19 [PMID: 16396053]
  3. Int J Eat Disord. 2001 May;29(4):373-9 [PMID: 11285574]
  4. Adolescence. 1994 Fall;29(115):711-22 [PMID: 7832035]
  5. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2001 Apr;14(2):93-102 [PMID: 11330266]
  6. Body Image. 2010 Mar;7(2):124-30 [PMID: 20153709]
  7. J Athl Train. 2003 Mar;38(1):62-66 [PMID: 12937474]
  8. Obes Res. 2000 Nov;8(8):604 [PMID: 11156437]
  9. Public Health Nutr. 1999 Mar;2(1A):143-51 [PMID: 10933634]
  10. Eat Behav. 2004 May;5(2):147-56 [PMID: 15093784]
  11. J Am Coll Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;56(5):579-84 [PMID: 18400672]
  12. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;29(9):1169-80 [PMID: 15198085]
  13. Nutr J. 2012 Oct 15;11:85 [PMID: 23067040]
  14. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 Jul;23(7):738-45 [PMID: 10454108]
  15. Am J Prev Med. 2003 May;24(4):332-9 [PMID: 12726871]
  16. J Am Coll Nutr. 2002 Aug;21(4):307-14 [PMID: 12166527]
  17. J Adolesc Health. 2000 May;26(5):330-7 [PMID: 10775825]
  18. J Ment Health. 2010 Dec;19(6):492-9 [PMID: 20812852]
  19. Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Jun;40(3):497-504 [PMID: 16810375]
  20. Public Health. 2000 Nov;114(6):468-73 [PMID: 11114759]
  21. J Psychol. 2001 Nov;135(6):651-60 [PMID: 11931005]
  22. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Feb 12;5:9 [PMID: 18269748]
  23. Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(2):326-37 [PMID: 17070972]
  24. Nutr Hosp. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):613-21 [PMID: 20694298]
  25. J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jul;17(13):1803-13 [PMID: 18592628]
  26. Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Jun;98(3 Pt 2):1251-60 [PMID: 15291212]
  27. Eat Disord. 2004 Summer;12(2):125-37 [PMID: 16864312]
  28. Addict Behav. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):561-73 [PMID: 12188592]
  29. J Am Coll Health. 2005 Sep-Oct;54(2):87-94 [PMID: 16255320]
  30. Obes Res. 2001 Nov;9 Suppl 4:228S-233S [PMID: 11707546]
  31. Public Health Nutr. 2005 Aug;8(5):509-19 [PMID: 16153332]
  32. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006;15(4):516-20 [PMID: 17077068]
  33. Appetite. 2008 Jul;51(1):214-7 [PMID: 18342397]
  34. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 18;8:75 [PMID: 21767360]
  35. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Mar 22;8:20 [PMID: 21426567]
  36. Int J Eat Disord. 2002 Jan;31(1):1-16 [PMID: 11835293]
  37. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Aug;16(8):1976-9 [PMID: 18551115]

MeSH Term

Anthropometry
Body Image
Female
Humans
Italy
Male
Motor Activity
Students
Universities
Weight Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0weightstatusperceptionmalesimagefemalessignificantlyhigherBodydissatisfactionuniversitystudents3womenactivebodyphysicalactivityindexFAIexamineddegreeinconsistencyrelationsampleaged±yrs6usedBMIassessednewFeelminusfigure4versusmeanFIDvaluespositivemenMenshowedItalianactualBACKGROUND:dependsanthropometricpsychologicalfactorsinfluencedsocio-culturalenvironmentassociatedeatingdisorderslowself-esteemstudysexamountMETHODS:participants73435421529380221recruitedsecondyearSportSciencesprogramself-administeredquestionnaireacquiresocio-demographicsportparticipationinformationHeightconsideredsubjectsilhouettematchingtechniqueActualInconsistencyassessRESULTS:largeproportionnormalaveragechosefeel78likedthinnerThereforeIdealDiscrepancysexesmeaningnegativeindicatingtendencyoverestimateunderestimatephysicallyLesslowerlessengagedCONCLUSIONS:resultsshowgreaterconsistencyamongfindingssuggestcanusefulevaluateperceivedcomparisonanthropometricallyperceptionsmeasurementsmeanslevel

Similar Articles

Cited By