Distinguishing Electronic and Vibronic Coherence in 2D Spectra by Their Temperature Dependence.

Václav Perlík, Craig Lincoln, František Sanda, Jürgen Hauer
Author Information
  1. Václav Perlík: Institute of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University , Ke Karlovu 5, Prague 121 16, Czech Republic.
  2. Craig Lincoln: Photonics Institute, Vienna University of Technology , Gusshausstrasse 27, 1040 Vienna, Austria.
  3. František Sanda: Institute of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University , Ke Karlovu 5, Prague 121 16, Czech Republic.
  4. Jürgen Hauer: Photonics Institute, Vienna University of Technology , Gusshausstrasse 27, 1040 Vienna, Austria.

Abstract

Long-lived oscillations in 2D spectra of chlorophylls are at the heart of an ongoing debate. Their physical origin is either a multipigment effect, such as excitonic coherence, or localized vibrations. We show how relative phase differences of diagonal- and cross-peak oscillations can distinguish between electronic and vibrational (vibronic) effects. While direct discrimination between the two scenarios is obscured when peaks overlap, their sensitivity to temperature provides a stronger argument. We show that vibrational (vibronic) oscillations change relative phase with temperature, while electronic oscillations are only weakly dependent. This highlights that studies of relative phase difference as a function of temperature provide a clear and easily accessible method to distinguish between vibrational and electronic coherences.

References

  1. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012 Jun 7;3(11):1497-502 [PMID: 26285628]
  2. J Phys Chem A. 2008 May 8;112(18):4254-60 [PMID: 18376878]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 27;108(52):20908-12 [PMID: 22167798]
  4. J Phys Chem B. 2013 Aug 15;117(32):9380-5 [PMID: 23879880]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 20;107(29):12766-70 [PMID: 20615985]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 22;110(4):1203-8 [PMID: 23267114]
  7. J Chem Phys. 2012 Jun 21;136(23):234501 [PMID: 22779600]
  8. J Phys Chem B. 2011 May 12;115(18):5383-91 [PMID: 21329370]
  9. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2003;54:425-63 [PMID: 12626736]
  10. J Phys Chem A. 2013 Jul 25;117(29):6007-14 [PMID: 23461650]
  11. J Chem Phys. 2012 Jul 28;137(4):044513 [PMID: 22852637]
  12. Chem Rev. 2009 Jun;109(6):2350-408 [PMID: 19432416]
  13. J Chem Phys. 2010 Jan 7;132(1):014501 [PMID: 20078166]
  14. J Phys Chem B. 2012 Jun 28;116(25):7449-54 [PMID: 22642682]
  15. J Chem Phys. 2013 Oct 14;139(14):144304 [PMID: 24116616]
  16. Nature. 2007 Apr 12;446(7137):782-6 [PMID: 17429397]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0oscillationsrelativephaseelectronicvibrationaltemperature2DshowdistinguishvibronicLong-livedspectrachlorophyllsheartongoingdebatephysicalorigineithermultipigmenteffectexcitoniccoherencelocalizedvibrationsdifferencesdiagonal-cross-peakcaneffectsdirectdiscriminationtwoscenariosobscuredpeaksoverlapsensitivityprovidesstrongerargumentchangeweaklydependenthighlightsstudiesdifferencefunctionprovidecleareasilyaccessiblemethodcoherencesDistinguishingElectronicVibronicCoherenceSpectraTemperatureDependence

Similar Articles

Cited By