Free air on plain film: Do we need a computed tomography too?

Carolina V Solis, Yuchiao Chang, Marc A De Moya, George C Velmahos, Peter J Fagenholz
Author Information
  1. Carolina V Solis: Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  2. Yuchiao Chang: Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  3. Marc A De Moya: Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA ; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  4. George C Velmahos: Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA ; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  5. Peter J Fagenholz: Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA ; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

CONTEXT: Standard teaching is that patients with pneumoperitoneum on plain X-ray and clinical signs of abdominal pathology should undergo urgent surgery. It is unknown if abdominal computed tomography (CT) provides additional useful information in this scenario.
AIMS: The aim of this study is to determine whether or not CT scanning after identification of pneumoperitoneum on plain X-ray changes clinical management or outcomes.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective study carried out over 4 years at a tertiary care academic medical center. All patients in our acute care surgery database with pneumoperitoneum on plain X-ray were included. Patients who underwent subsequent CT scanning (CT group) were compared with patients who did not (non-CT group).
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, t-test and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate to compare the groups.
RESULTS: There were 25 patients in the non-CT group and 18 patients in the CT group. There were no differences between the groups at presentation. All patients in the non-CT group underwent surgery, compared with 83% (n = 15) of patients in the CT group (P = 0.066). 16 patients in the non-CT and 11 patients in the CT group presented with peritonitis and all underwent surgery regardless of group. For patients undergoing surgery, there were no differences in outcomes between the groups. After X-ray, patients undergoing CT required 328.0 min to arrive in the operating room compared with 136.0 min in the non-CT group (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pneumoperitoneum on X-ray and peritonitis on physical exam, CT delays surgery without providing any measurable benefit.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Apr;92(3):182-8 [PMID: 20412668]
  2. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1999 Apr;20(2):142-7 [PMID: 10222521]
  3. Am J Surg. 2012 Dec;204(6):1025-30; discussion 1030 [PMID: 23022250]
  4. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1971 Jul;112(3):574-85 [PMID: 5570369]
  5. Arch Surg. 1989 Jul;124(7):830-2 [PMID: 2742484]
  6. Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2638-44 [PMID: 10921609]
  7. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003 Nov;41(6):1095-115, v [PMID: 14661660]
  8. Eur J Radiol. 2004 Apr;50(1):30-6 [PMID: 15093233]
  9. Abdom Imaging. 1996 Sep-Oct;21(5):404-12 [PMID: 8832859]
  10. Eur Radiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):1396-403 [PMID: 19997849]
  11. Arch Surg. 1988 Jun;123(6):709-12 [PMID: 3285808]
  12. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Aug;14(4):423-7 [PMID: 18614906]
  13. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):2061-71 [PMID: 22274929]
  14. World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2347-54; discussion 2355-8 [PMID: 17896131]
  15. Gastroenterology. 1966 Sep;51(3):393-8 [PMID: 5945819]
  16. Cir Esp. 2013 May;91(5):316-23 [PMID: 23036254]
  17. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Mar;94(2):102-7 [PMID: 22391377]
  18. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84 [PMID: 18046031]
  19. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992 Sep-Oct;16(5):713-6 [PMID: 1522261]
  20. Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):254-63 [PMID: 18566177]
  21. Clin Radiol. 2007 Oct;62(10):961-9 [PMID: 17765461]
  22. Br J Surg. 2002 Mar;89(3):351-4 [PMID: 11872063]
  23. West J Med. 1999 Jan;170(1):41-6 [PMID: 9926735]
  24. Ugeskr Laeger. 1996 Aug 19;158(34):4759-62 [PMID: 8801684]
  25. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83 [PMID: 3558716]
  26. ANZ J Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;82(1-2):36-41 [PMID: 22507493]
  27. Korean J Radiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;10(1):63-70 [PMID: 19182505]
  28. Radiol Med. 1996 Mar;91(3):247-52 [PMID: 8628938]
  29. Am Surg. 1998 Apr;64(4):313-22 [PMID: 9544141]
  30. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Aug;15(8):1329-35 [PMID: 21567292]
  31. Asia Pac Allergy. 2012 Oct;2(4):242-7 [PMID: 23130329]
  32. Abdom Imaging. 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):524-34 [PMID: 16096870]
  33. Am J Surg. 1983 Dec;146(6):830-3 [PMID: 6650772]
  34. Radiol Clin North Am. 1993 Nov;31(6):1219-34 [PMID: 8210347]
  35. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Apr;87(4):390-402 [PMID: 22469351]
  36. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 Sep-Oct;48(41):1393-6 [PMID: 11677972]
  37. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1996 Aug;37(3):163-90 [PMID: 8872409]
  38. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):573-8; discussion 578-9 [PMID: 22929486]
  39. Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):460-9 [PMID: 23386731]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsCTgroupsurgerypneumoperitoneumplainX-raynon-CT0computedtomographyunderwentcomparedgroups=peritonitisclinicalabdominalstudyscanningoutcomescaretestdifferencesPundergoingminCONTEXT:StandardteachingsignspathologyundergourgentunknownprovidesadditionalusefulinformationscenarioAIMS:aimdeterminewhetheridentificationchangesmanagementSETTINGSANDDESIGN:Retrospectivecarried4yearstertiaryacademicmedicalcenteracutedatabaseincludedPatientssubsequentSTATISTICALANALYSISUSED:Wilcoxonrank-sumt-testFisher'sexactusedappropriatecompareRESULTS:2518presentation83%n150661611presentedregardlessrequired328arriveoperatingroom136007CONCLUSIONS:physicalexamdelayswithoutprovidingmeasurablebenefitFreeairfilm:needtoo?Acuteabdomenscangastrointestinalperforationfilm

Similar Articles

Cited By