Sexually antagonistic association between paternal phenotype and offspring viability reinforces total selection on a sexually selected trait.

Alexandre M Martin, Marco Festa-Bianchet, David W Coltman, Fanie Pelletier
Author Information
  1. Alexandre M Martin: Département de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, , 2500 boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada , J1K 2R1.

Abstract

The evolution of conspicuous sexually selected traits, such as horns or antlers, has fascinated biologists for more than a century. Elaborate traits can only evolve if they substantially increase reproduction, because they probably incur survival costs to the bearer. Total selection on these traits, however, includes sexual selection on sires and viability selection on offspring and can be influenced by changes in each of these components. Non-random associations between paternal phenotype and offspring viability may thus affect total selection on sexually selected traits. Long-term data on wild bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) provide the first evidence in nature that association between paternal phenotype and lamb viability strengthens total selection on horn size of adult rams, a sexually selected trait. The association of paternal horn length and offspring viability was sexually antagonistic: long-horned males sired sons with high viability but daughters of low viability. These results shed new light on the evolutionary dynamics of an iconic sexually selected trait and have important implications for sustainable wildlife management.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Jun 17;12(7):475-86 [PMID: 21681209]
  2. Evolution. 2005 Jun;59(6):1372-82 [PMID: 16050112]
  3. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Feb 1;16(2):95-100 [PMID: 11165708]
  4. Science. 2013 May 3;340(6132):549 [PMID: 23641093]
  5. Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):36-47 [PMID: 17298509]
  6. Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226 [PMID: 28556011]
  7. Science. 2002 Apr 26;296(5568):707-11 [PMID: 11976447]
  8. Nature. 2003 Dec 11;426(6967):655-8 [PMID: 14668862]
  9. Oecologia. 2008 Jul;156(4):773-81 [PMID: 18443828]
  10. Nature. 2007 Jun 28;447(7148):1107-10 [PMID: 17597758]
  11. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 22;269(1487):165-72 [PMID: 11798432]
  12. J Evol Biol. 2011 Jan;24(1):121-31 [PMID: 21044200]
  13. Mol Ecol. 1998 May;7(5):639-55 [PMID: 9633105]

MeSH Term

Animals
Body Weight
Female
Horns
Male
Mating Preference, Animal
Models, Biological
Phenotype
Regression Analysis
Seasons
Sex Characteristics
Sheep, Bighorn

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0selectionviabilitysexuallyselectedtraitsoffspringpaternaltotalsexualphenotypeassociationtraitcanhornevolutionconspicuoushornsantlersfascinatedbiologistscenturyElaborateevolvesubstantiallyincreasereproductionprobablyincursurvivalcostsbearerTotalhoweverincludessiresinfluencedchangescomponentsNon-randomassociationsmaythusaffectLong-termdatawildbighornsheepOviscanadensisprovidefirstevidencenaturelambstrengthenssizeadultramslengthantagonistic:long-hornedmalessiredsonshighdaughterslowresultsshednewlightevolutionarydynamicsiconicimportantimplicationssustainablewildlifemanagementSexuallyantagonisticreinforcesantagonism

Similar Articles

Cited By