The role of biomarkers in the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health.

Sharon E Hook, Evan P Gallagher, Graeme E Batley
Author Information
  1. Sharon E Hook: CSIRO Centre for Environmental Contaminants Research Land and Water, Kirrawee, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Ensuring the health of aquatic ecosystems and identifying species at risk from the detrimental effects of environmental contaminants can be facilitated by integrating analytical chemical analysis with carefully selected biological endpoints measured in tissues of species of concern. These biological endpoints include molecular, biochemical, and physiological markers (i.e., biomarkers) that when integrated, can clarify issues of contaminant bioavailability, bioaccumulation, and ecological effects while enabling a better understanding of the effects of nonchemical stressors. In the case of contaminant stressors, an understanding of chemical modes of toxicity can be incorporated with diagnostic markers of aquatic animal physiology to help understand the health status of aquatic organisms in the field. Furthermore, new approaches in functional genomics and bioinformatics can help discriminate individual chemicals, or groups of chemicals among complex mixtures that may contribute to adverse biological effects. Although the use of biomarkers is not a new paradigm, such approaches have been underused in the context of ecological risk assessment and natural resource damage assessment. From a regulatory standpoint, these approaches can help better assess the complex effects from coastal development activities to assessing ecosystem integrity pre- and post development or site remediation.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Aug 6;47(15):8869-77 [PMID: 23834071]
  2. Mar Environ Res. 2004 Aug-Dec;58(2-5):151-5 [PMID: 15178027]
  3. Chemosphere. 2006 Nov;65(6):952-62 [PMID: 16725179]
  4. Aquat Toxicol. 2013 Aug 15;138-139:12-25 [PMID: 23680677]
  5. Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Feb 1;41(3):1044-50 [PMID: 17328222]
  6. Aquat Toxicol. 2009 Oct 4;94(4):309-19 [PMID: 19709761]
  7. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Apr;90:157-66 [PMID: 23352272]
  8. Aquat Toxicol. 2006 Feb 10;76(2):160-202 [PMID: 16289342]
  9. Mar Environ Res. 2001 Sep;52(3):213-29 [PMID: 11570803]
  10. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 Feb;30(2):290-300 [PMID: 21072851]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2007 Jun;4(2):158-65 [PMID: 17617680]
  12. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Oct;104(10):1096-101 [PMID: 8930552]
  13. Sci Total Environ. 2003 Jun 20;309(1-3):105-15 [PMID: 12798096]
  14. Aquat Toxicol. 2011 Sep;105(1-2):189-98 [PMID: 21723217]
  15. Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Apr 15;40(8):2851-8 [PMID: 16683634]
  16. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Jul;106(7):375-84 [PMID: 9637794]
  17. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;145(1):73-85 [PMID: 17215170]
  18. Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991;100(1-2):173-6 [PMID: 1677850]
  19. Mutat Res. 2004 Aug 18;552(1-2):19-34 [PMID: 15288539]
  20. Aquat Toxicol. 2013 Sep 15;140-141:295-302 [PMID: 23851056]
  21. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Dec;24(12):3092-8 [PMID: 16445090]
  22. Aquat Toxicol. 2008 Jun 2;88(1):29-38 [PMID: 18423645]
  23. Mar Pollut Bull. 2005 May;50(5):495-503 [PMID: 15907491]
  24. Biomarkers. 2007 Mar-Apr;12(2):155-72 [PMID: 17536766]
  25. Mar Pollut Bull. 2001 Aug;42(8):656-66 [PMID: 11525283]
  26. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2009;72(3-4):226-33 [PMID: 19184737]
  27. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19735 [PMID: 21625421]
  28. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996 Jul;31(1):141-7 [PMID: 8688001]
  29. Environ Pollut. 2013 Jul;178:41-51 [PMID: 23542355]
  30. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010 Mar;29(3):730-41 [PMID: 20821501]
  31. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28013 [PMID: 22194802]
  32. Mar Environ Res. 2008 Jul;66(1):134-6 [PMID: 18417205]
  33. Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Dec;185(12):10191-9 [PMID: 23836428]
  34. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2013 Aug;165(4):476-82 [PMID: 23500622]
  35. Aquat Toxicol. 2011 Apr;102(3-4):205-15 [PMID: 21356183]
  36. Ecotoxicology. 2012 Jul;21(5):1415-25 [PMID: 22526923]
  37. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 May;20(5):1141-8 [PMID: 11337880]
  38. Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Sep 15;37(18):4043-51 [PMID: 14524434]
  39. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;919:9-15 [PMID: 11083092]
  40. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 Jan;30(1):39-51 [PMID: 20963851]
  41. Aquat Toxicol. 2006 Mar 10;76(3-4):258-67 [PMID: 16297460]
  42. Chemosphere. 2009 Feb;74(5):613-20 [PMID: 19101010]
  43. Toxicology. 2007 Mar 7;231(2-3):175-87 [PMID: 17239514]
  44. Mar Pollut Bull. 2002 Aug;44(8):761-9 [PMID: 12269479]
  45. Mar Pollut Bull. 2005 Jul;50(7):705-23 [PMID: 15946701]
  46. Ecotoxicology. 2010 Apr;19(4):735-50 [PMID: 20033486]
  47. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Dec;113(12):1675-82 [PMID: 16330346]
  48. Pharmacogenomics. 2006 Oct;7(7):1003-16 [PMID: 17054411]
  49. Ecotoxicology. 2012 Apr;21(3):768-82 [PMID: 22215560]
  50. Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Dec 15;42(24):9404-11 [PMID: 19174923]
  51. Mar Environ Res. 2009 Sep;68(3):118-27 [PMID: 19481793]
  52. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007 Jun;26(6):1205-13 [PMID: 17571687]
  53. Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Feb 15;42(4):1352-8 [PMID: 18351116]
  54. Aquat Toxicol. 2006 May 25;77(4):372-85 [PMID: 16488489]
  55. Aquat Toxicol. 2011 Jan 17;101(1):295-7 [PMID: 20869781]
  56. Environ Pollut. 2002;120(3):497-507 [PMID: 12442773]
  57. Aquat Toxicol. 2000 Dec;51(2):241-58 [PMID: 11064127]
  58. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jun 4;47(11):5947-53 [PMID: 23634897]
  59. Mutat Res. 1999 Apr 26;441(1):103-14 [PMID: 10224327]
  60. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006 Dec;25(12):3171-80 [PMID: 17220086]
  61. Ecotoxicology. 2011 Nov;20(8):1959-74 [PMID: 21769590]
  62. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 Oct;30(10):2326-34 [PMID: 21805497]
  63. Aquat Toxicol. 2012 Apr;110-111:37-44 [PMID: 22257444]
  64. Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jan 3;46(1):3-9 [PMID: 22043966]
  65. Chemosphere. 2012 May;87(7):692-702 [PMID: 22236592]
  66. Toxicology. 2002 Dec 27;181-182:531-6 [PMID: 12505363]
  67. Biomarkers. 2005 Mar-Jun;10(2-3):105-16 [PMID: 16076726]
  68. Aquat Toxicol. 2011 Oct;105(3-4):455-65 [PMID: 21872557]
  69. Mar Environ Res. 2013 Aug;89:29-38 [PMID: 23702095]
  70. Mar Environ Res. 2004 Aug-Dec;58(2-5):597-601 [PMID: 15178085]
  71. Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jun 5;46(11):6081-7 [PMID: 22587496]
  72. J Fish Biol. 2010 Dec;77(9):1999-2022 [PMID: 21133914]
  73. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30116 [PMID: 22312421]
  74. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2003 Mar;54(3):366-74 [PMID: 12651193]
  75. Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Jul;184(7):4309-34 [PMID: 21814719]
  76. Aquat Toxicol. 2001 Jun;53(1):19-32 [PMID: 11254944]
  77. Mutat Res. 1998 Mar 13;399(1):65-85 [PMID: 9635490]
  78. Life Sci. 1974 Jul 15;15(2):177-90 [PMID: 4620960]
  79. Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Feb 7;46(3):1877-85 [PMID: 22165990]
  80. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Mar;117(3):348-53 [PMID: 19337507]
  81. Aquat Toxicol. 2013 Jul 15;136-137:32-48 [PMID: 23643723]
  82. Aquat Toxicol. 2010 Jan 21;96(1):2-26 [PMID: 19931199]
  83. Mar Environ Res. 2011 Jul;72(1-2):13-24 [PMID: 21683998]
  84. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006 Jan;25(1):272-80 [PMID: 16494252]
  85. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 May;28(5):1104-9 [PMID: 19045938]
  86. Aquat Toxicol. 2007 Oct 15;84(3):310-320 [PMID: 17659788]
  87. Mar Pollut Bull. 2004 Mar;48(5-6):572-86 [PMID: 14980473]
  88. BMC Genomics. 2009 Dec 15;10:608 [PMID: 20003521]
  89. Aquat Toxicol. 2014 Jan;146:247-57 [PMID: 24334007]
  90. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 May 21;47(10):5450-8 [PMID: 23600964]

Grants

  1. P42 ES004696/NIEHS NIH HHS
  2. P42ES004696/NIEHS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Biomarkers
Ecosystem
Environmental Monitoring
Risk Assessment
Water Pollutants, Chemical

Chemicals

Biomarkers
Water Pollutants, Chemical

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0effectscanaquatichealthbiologicalbiomarkershelpapproachesassessmentspeciesriskchemicalendpointsmarkerscontaminantecologicalbetterunderstandingstressorsnewchemicalscomplexdevelopmentecosystemEnsuringecosystemsidentifyingdetrimentalenvironmentalcontaminantsfacilitatedintegratinganalyticalanalysiscarefullyselectedmeasuredtissuesconcernincludemolecularbiochemicalphysiologicalieintegratedclarifyissuesbioavailabilitybioaccumulationenablingnonchemicalcasemodestoxicityincorporateddiagnosticanimalphysiologyunderstandstatusorganismsfieldFurthermorefunctionalgenomicsbioinformaticsdiscriminateindividualgroupsamongmixturesmaycontributeadverseAlthoughuseparadigmunderusedcontextnaturalresourcedamageregulatorystandpointassesscoastalactivitiesassessingintegritypre-postsiteremediationroleAssaysFishGeneexpressionMetalsOilPesticides

Similar Articles

Cited By (34)