Gender differences in emotionality and sociability in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Alexandra M Head, Jane A McGillivray, Mark A Stokes
Author Information
  1. Jane A McGillivray: School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia. jane.mcgillivray@deakin.edu.au.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Four times as many males are diagnosed with high functioning autism compared to females. A growing body of research that focused on females with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) questions the assumption of gender invariance in ASD. Clinical observations suggest that females with ASD superficially demonstrate better social and emotional skills than males with ASD, which may camouflage other diagnostic features. This may explain the under-diagnosis of females with ASD.
METHODS: We hypothesised that females with ASD would display better social skills than males with ASD on a test of friendship and social function. One hundred and one 10- to 16-year-olds (ASD females, n = 25; typically developing (TD) females, n = 25; ASD males, n = 25; TD males, n = 26) were interviewed (using the friendship questionnaire (FQ)) with high scores indicating the child has close, empathetic and supportive relationships. One parent of each child completed the FQ to assess whether there are differences in perception of friendships between parents and children.
RESULTS: It was found that, independent of diagnosis, females demonstrated higher scores on the FQ than males. Further, regardless of gender, children with ASD demonstrated lower scores than TD children. Moreover, the effect of ASD was independent of gender. Interestingly, females with ASD and TD males displayed similar scores on the FQ.
CONCLUSIONS: This finding is supported by clinical reports that females with ASD have more developed social skills than males with ASD. Further research is now required to examine the underlying causes for this phenomenon in order to develop gender-appropriate diagnostic criteria and interventions for ASD.

References

  1. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Jun;40(6):751-61 [PMID: 20039110]
  2. J Autism Dev Disord. 1982 Dec;12(4):317-30 [PMID: 7161234]
  3. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Mar;44(3):627-35 [PMID: 23989936]
  4. Autism. 2003 Mar;7(1):81-97 [PMID: 12638766]
  5. Br J Dev Psychol. 2009 Sep;27(Pt 3):743-60 [PMID: 19994579]
  6. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2006;71(2):vii-166 [PMID: 17177915]
  7. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;51(8):756-8 [PMID: 22840545]
  8. Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;132(1):98-131 [PMID: 16435959]
  9. J Adolesc. 2009 Oct;32(5):1105-23 [PMID: 19304316]
  10. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Aug;38(7):1211-29 [PMID: 18058212]
  11. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Jul;42(7):1304-13 [PMID: 21947663]
  12. Autism. 2001 Mar;5(1):23-36 [PMID: 11708387]
  13. Autism Res. 2011 Apr;4(2):121-31 [PMID: 21298812]
  14. Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Jun;29(Pt 2):153-7 [PMID: 21592145]
  15. Am Sociol Rev. 1978 Apr;43(2):237-50 [PMID: 350112]
  16. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Dec;40(12):1512-20 [PMID: 20405193]
  17. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Feb;37(2):230-42 [PMID: 16855874]
  18. Autism Res. 2012 Jun;5(3):160-79 [PMID: 22495912]
  19. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Nov;43(11):2584-603 [PMID: 23525974]
  20. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;51(8):788-97 [PMID: 22840550]
  21. Psychiatry Res. 1981 Oct;5(2):129-37 [PMID: 6945608]
  22. Soc Sci Res. 2008 Mar;37(1):55-72 [PMID: 18443653]
  23. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003 Oct;33(5):509-17 [PMID: 14594330]
  24. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Jan;37(1):86-97 [PMID: 17216333]
  25. J Autism Dev Disord. 1981 Mar;11(1):31-44 [PMID: 6927697]
  26. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1992 Apr;1(2):89-99 [PMID: 29871391]
  27. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 May;41(5):533-44 [PMID: 20676748]
  28. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20835 [PMID: 21695147]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ASDfemalesmalessocialTDFQscoreschildrenautismgenderskillsn = 25highresearchspectrumbettermaydiagnosticfriendshipOnechilddifferencesindependentdemonstratedBACKGROUND:FourtimesmanydiagnosedfunctioningcomparedgrowingbodyfocuseddisorderquestionsassumptioninvarianceClinicalobservationssuggestsuperficiallydemonstrateemotionalcamouflagefeaturesexplainunder-diagnosisMETHODS:hypothesiseddisplaytestfunctionhundredone10-16-year-oldstypicallydevelopingn = 26interviewedusingquestionnaireindicatingcloseempatheticsupportiverelationshipsparentcompletedassesswhetherperceptionfriendshipsparentsRESULTS:founddiagnosishigherregardlesslowerMoreovereffectInterestinglydisplayedsimilarCONCLUSIONS:findingsupportedclinicalreportsdevelopednowrequiredexamineunderlyingcausesphenomenonorderdevelopgender-appropriatecriteriainterventionsGenderemotionalitysociabilitydisorders

Similar Articles

Cited By