Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infections in a neonatal intensive care unit despite active surveillance cultures and decolonization: challenges for infection prevention.

Victor O Popoola, Alicia Budd, Sara M Wittig, Tracy Ross, Susan W Aucott, Trish M Perl, Karen C Carroll, Aaron M Milstone
Author Information
  1. Victor O Popoola: Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and infections in a level IIIC neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and identify barriers to MRSA control.
SETTING AND DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study in a university-affiliated NICU with an MRSA control program including weekly nares cultures of all neonates and admission nares cultures for neonates transferred from other hospitals or admitted from home.
METHODS: Medical records were reviewed to identify neonates with NICU-acquired MRSA colonization or infection between April 2007 and December 2011. Compliance with hand hygiene and an MRSA decolonization protocol were monitored. Relatedness of MRSA strains were assessed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).
RESULTS: Of 3,536 neonates, 74 (2.0%) had a culture grow MRSA, including 62 neonates with NICU-acquired MRSA. Nineteen of 74 neonates (26%) had an MRSA infection, including 8 who became infected before they were identified as MRSA colonized, and 11 of 66 colonized neonates (17%) developed a subsequent infection. Of the 37 neonates that underwent decolonization, 6 (16%) developed a subsequent infection, and 7 of 14 (50%) that remained in the NICU for 21 days or more became recolonized with MRSA. Using PFGE, there were 14 different strain types identified, with USA300 being the most common (31%).
CONCLUSIONS: Current strategies to prevent infections-including active identification and decolonization of MRSA-colonized neonates-are inadequate because infants develop infections before being identified as colonized or after attempted decolonization. Future prevention efforts would benefit from improving detection of MRSA colonization, optimizing decolonization regimens, and identifying and interrupting reservoirs of transmission.

References

  1. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Apr;16(4):647-55 [PMID: 20350379]
  2. J Hosp Infect. 2000 Oct;46(2):123-9 [PMID: 11049705]
  3. Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):469-74 [PMID: 16882797]
  4. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Nov;41(11):5113-20 [PMID: 14605147]
  5. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 May;24(5):317-21 [PMID: 12785403]
  6. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;57(10):1458-60 [PMID: 23943821]
  7. J Perinatol. 2013 Apr;33(4):313-8 [PMID: 22918547]
  8. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23001 [PMID: 21857979]
  9. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;33(12):1200-6 [PMID: 23143356]
  10. Pediatrics. 2011 Aug;128(2):e348-57 [PMID: 21768312]
  11. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54898 [PMID: 23382995]
  12. J R Soc Interface. 2012 Oct 7;9(75):2639-52 [PMID: 22572025]
  13. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;31(6):613-9 [PMID: 20420500]
  14. Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):e1252-9 [PMID: 22473373]
  15. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;17(12):811-3 [PMID: 8985769]
  16. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Jul;28(7):577-81 [PMID: 19478687]
  17. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;31(7):766-8 [PMID: 20470034]
  18. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 May;31(5):558-60 [PMID: 20334509]
  19. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;53(9):853-9 [PMID: 21878424]
  20. J Hosp Infect. 1995 Oct;31(2):123-34 [PMID: 8551018]
  21. Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):e790-6 [PMID: 19403471]
  22. Am J Infect Control. 2002 May;30(3):170-3 [PMID: 11988712]
  23. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;27(2):139-45 [PMID: 16465630]
  24. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;27(6):636-7 [PMID: 16755488]
  25. J Perinatol. 2012 Jan;32(1):4-9 [PMID: 22031047]
  26. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;26(2):157-60 [PMID: 15756886]
  27. JAMA. 2007 Oct 17;298(15):1763-71 [PMID: 17940231]
  28. JAMA. 2004 Nov 17;292(19):2357-65 [PMID: 15547163]
  29. Am J Infect Control. 2011 Feb;39(1):35-41 [PMID: 21281885]
  30. Public Health Rep. 2007 Mar-Apr;122(2):160-6 [PMID: 17357358]

Grants

  1. K23 AI081752/NIAID NIH HHS
  2. 1 K23 AI081752-04/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Academic Medical Centers
Baltimore
Cross Infection
Disease Outbreaks
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Medical Audit
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Retrospective Studies
Staphylococcal Infections

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MRSAneonatesinfectiondecolonizationtransmissioninfectionsNICUincludingculturesidentifiedcolonizedStaphylococcusaureusneonatalintensivecareunitidentifycontrolnaresNICU-acquiredcolonizationPFGE74becamedevelopedsubsequent14activepreventionOBJECTIVE:characterizeepidemiologymethicillin-resistantlevelIIICbarriersSETTINGANDDESIGN:Retrospectivecohortstudyuniversity-affiliatedprogramweeklyadmissiontransferredhospitalsadmittedhomeMETHODS:MedicalrecordsreviewedApril2007December2011CompliancehandhygieneprotocolmonitoredRelatednessstrainsassessedusingpulsed-fieldgelelectrophoresisRESULTS:353620%culturegrow62Nineteen26%8infected116617%37underwent616%750%remained21daysrecolonizedUsingdifferentstraintypesUSA300common31%CONCLUSIONS:Currentstrategiespreventinfections-includingidentificationMRSA-colonizedneonates-areinadequateinfantsdevelopattemptedFutureeffortsbenefitimprovingdetectionoptimizingregimensidentifyinginterruptingreservoirsMethicillin-resistantdespitesurveillancedecolonization:challenges

Similar Articles

Cited By