Overcoming the barriers to the diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/ME in primary care: a meta synthesis of qualitative studies.

Kerin Bayliss, Mark Goodall, Anna Chisholm, Beth Fordham, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Lisa Riste, Louise Fisher, Karina Lovell, Sarah Peters, Alison Wearden
Author Information
  1. Kerin Bayliss: Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. kerin.bayliss@manchester.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The NICE guideline for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) emphasises the need for an early diagnosis in primary care with management tailored to patient needs. However, GPs can be reluctant to make a diagnosis and are unsure how to manage people with the condition.
METHODS: A meta synthesis of published qualitative studies was conducted, producing a multi-perspective description of barriers to the diagnosis and management of CFS/ME, and the ways that some health professionals have been able to overcome them. Analysis provided second-order interpretation of the original findings and developed third-order constructs to provide recommendations for the medical curriculum.
RESULTS: Twenty one qualitative studies were identified. The literature shows that for over 20 years health professionals have reported a limited understanding of CFS/ME. Working within the framework of the biomedical model has also led some GPs to be sceptical about the existence of the condition. GPs who provide a diagnosis tend to have a broader, multifactorial, model of the condition and more positive attitudes towards CFS/ME. These GPs collaborate with patients to reach agreement on symptom management, and use their therapeutic skills to promote self care.
CONCLUSIONS: In order to address barriers to the diagnosis and management of CFS/ME in primary care, the limitations of the biomedical model needs to be recognised. A more flexible bio-psychosocial approach is recommended where medical school training aims to equip practitioners with the skills needed to understand, support and manage patients and provide a pathway to refer for specialist input.

References

  1. Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jan;52(1):11-23 [PMID: 11144910]
  2. BMJ. 2004 Jun 5;328(7452):1354-7 [PMID: 15169743]
  3. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):209-15 [PMID: 12425780]
  4. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Jan;68(1):5-8 [PMID: 20004295]
  5. J Health Psychol. 2007 Mar;12(2):203-14 [PMID: 17284485]
  6. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;160(2):221-36 [PMID: 12562565]
  7. Soc Work Health Care. 2000;30(3):73-93 [PMID: 10880009]
  8. J R Soc Med. 1995 Jun;88(6):325-9 [PMID: 7629762]
  9. Orthop Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;23(6):364-74 [PMID: 15682879]
  10. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Feb;49(439):131-4 [PMID: 10326269]
  11. Lancet. 2006 Jan 28;367(9507):346-55 [PMID: 16443043]
  12. BMC Nurs. 2009 Jan 22;8:2 [PMID: 19161604]
  13. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Aug;57(4):711-20 [PMID: 12821018]
  14. BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Nov 15;11:89 [PMID: 21078171]
  15. Fam Pract. 2011 Oct;28(5):572-8 [PMID: 21555341]
  16. Psychol Med. 2006 Jul;36(7):895-900 [PMID: 16403245]
  17. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Oct;73(1):36-41 [PMID: 18486415]
  18. Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(4):263-70 [PMID: 19807959]
  19. Ann Fam Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;6(4):340-8 [PMID: 18626034]
  20. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):20-8 [PMID: 17698311]
  21. Med Educ. 2008 Mar;42(3):309-14 [PMID: 18275419]
  22. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):147-55 [PMID: 21571484]
  23. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014 Apr;15(2):143-55 [PMID: 23702254]
  24. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Sep 21;13:93 [PMID: 22998151]
  25. Fam Pract. 2005 Aug;22(4):389-93 [PMID: 15805128]
  26. J R Soc Med. 1997 May;90(5):250-4 [PMID: 9204018]
  27. BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 11;9:458 [PMID: 20003363]
  28. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 May;91(2):249-54 [PMID: 23369375]
  29. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 15;11:217 [PMID: 21923897]
  30. Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(2):103-9 [PMID: 20529471]
  31. BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Dec 13;6:49 [PMID: 16351714]
  32. J Health Psychol. 2010 Apr;15(3):426-35 [PMID: 20348363]
  33. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Dec;20(12):1057-61 [PMID: 21693464]
  34. J Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;20(2):198-209 [PMID: 24058124]
  35. Implement Sci. 2011 Dec 22;6:132 [PMID: 22192566]
  36. J Rheumatol. 2003 Apr;30(4):804-8 [PMID: 12672203]
  37. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2011 Apr;12(2):112-22 [PMID: 21457596]
  38. BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Feb 23;11:16 [PMID: 20178588]
  39. Postgrad Med J. 1999 Jul;75(885):405-9 [PMID: 10474724]

Grants

  1. G0200212/Medical Research Council
  2. G0401181/Medical Research Council
  3. PB-PG-0609-19108/Department of Health
  4. WMCLAHRC-2014-1/Department of Health

MeSH Term

Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
Primary Health Care
Qualitative Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diagnosisCFS/MEmanagementGPsprimarycareconditionqualitativestudiesbarriersprovidemodelneedsmanagemetasynthesishealthprofessionalsmedicalbiomedicalpatientsskillsBACKGROUND:NICEguidelineChronicFatigueSyndrome/MyalgicEncephalomyelitisemphasisesneedearlytailoredpatientHowevercanreluctantmakeunsurepeopleMETHODS:publishedconductedproducingmulti-perspectivedescriptionwaysableovercomeAnalysisprovidedsecond-orderinterpretationoriginalfindingsdevelopedthird-orderconstructsrecommendationscurriculumRESULTS:Twentyoneidentifiedliteratureshows20yearsreportedlimitedunderstandingWorkingwithinframeworkalsoledscepticalexistencetendbroadermultifactorialpositiveattitudestowardscollaboratereachagreementsymptomusetherapeuticpromoteselfCONCLUSIONS:orderaddresslimitationsrecognisedflexiblebio-psychosocialapproachrecommendedschooltrainingaimsequippractitionersneededunderstandsupportpathwayreferspecialistinputOvercomingchronicfatiguesyndrome/MEcare:

Similar Articles

Cited By