Reconstruction algorithm for improved ultrasound image quality.

Bruno Madore, F Can Meral
Author Information

Abstract

A new algorithm is proposed for reconstructing raw RF data into ultrasound images. Previous delay-and-sum beamforming reconstruction algorithms are essentially one-dimensional, because a sum is performed across all receiving elements. In contrast, the present approach is two-dimensional, potentially allowing any time point from any receiving element to contribute to any pixel location. Computer-intensive matrix inversions are performed once, in advance, to create a reconstruction matrix that can be reused indefinitely for a given probe and imaging geometry. Individual images are generated through a single matrix multiplication with the raw RF data, without any need for separate envelope detection or gridding steps. Raw RF data sets were acquired using a commercially available digital ultrasound engine for three imaging geometries: a 64-element array with a rectangular field-of- view (FOV), the same probe with a sector-shaped FOV, and a 128-element array with rectangular FOV. The acquired data were reconstructed using our proposed method and a delay- and-sum beamforming algorithm for comparison purposes. Point spread function (PSF) measurements from metal wires in a water bath showed that the proposed method was able to reduce the size of the PSF and its spatial integral by about 20 to 38%. Images from a commercially available quality-assurance phantom had greater spatial resolution and contrast when reconstructed with the proposed approach.

References

Ultrasonics. 2006 Dec 22;44 Suppl 1:e43-6 [PMID: 17056083]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2006 Oct;53(10):1759-71 [PMID: 17036785]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009 Sep;56(9):1868-79 [PMID: 19811990]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009 Feb;56(2):314-25 [PMID: 19251518]
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2003 Mar;7(1):64-70 [PMID: 12670020]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010 Nov;57(11):2381-90 [PMID: 21041127]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007 Aug;54(8):1606-13 [PMID: 17703664]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009 Oct;56(10):2187-97 [PMID: 19942506]
J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Apr;75(4):1273-82 [PMID: 6725779]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2006 Oct;53(10):1772-82 [PMID: 17036786]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007 Aug;54(8):1623-33 [PMID: 17703666]
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010 Jun;36(6):967-77 [PMID: 20447760]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1999;46(4):972-80 [PMID: 18238502]
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009 Dec;56(12):2612-23 [PMID: 20040398]
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010 Mar;14(2):538-40 [PMID: 19546045]

Grants

  1. R01EB010195/NIBIB NIH HHS
  2. R21EB009503/NIBIB NIH HHS
  3. P41RR019703/NCRR NIH HHS
  4. P41 RR019703/NCRR NIH HHS
  5. P41 EB015898/NIBIB NIH HHS
  6. R01 EB010195/NIBIB NIH HHS
  7. R21 EB009503/NIBIB NIH HHS
  8. R01 CA149342/NCI NIH HHS
  9. R01CA149342/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Image Enhancement
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Phantoms, Imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By