The role of psychosocial working conditions on burnout and its core component emotional exhaustion - a systematic review.

Andreas Seidler, Marleen Thinschmidt, Stefanie Deckert, Francisca Then, Janice Hegewald, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Steffi G Riedel-Heller
Author Information
  1. Andreas Seidler: Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. ArbSozPH@mailbox.tu-dresden.de.

Abstract

AIMS: To analyze the association between psychosocial working conditions and burnout and its core component emotional exhaustion, a systematic literature review was undertaken including cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials.
METHODS: The literature search in Medline and PsycInfo was based on a defined search string and strict exclusion and inclusion criteria. Evaluation of the 5,599 initially identified search hits by two independent reviewers and a detailed quality assessment resulted in six methodologically adequate cohort studies considering the relationship between psychosocial working conditions and burnout (one study) as well as the burnout core component emotional exhaustion (five studies).
RESULTS: The results of our systematic review point to a relationship between psychosocial working conditions and the development of emotional exhaustion/burnout. Particularly high job demands seem to play a role in the development of emotional exhaustion. However, strong intercorrelations between workplace factors, as a matter of principle, make the identification of a single psychosocial workplace factor (being associated with an especially high or low risk of burnout) difficult.
CONCLUSIONS: Multidimensional approaches including reduction of work demands, enhancement of decision latitude and improving the social climate might be promising for preventing burnout and emotional exhaustion. However, methodologically adequate intervention studies are urgently needed to prove the effectiveness of workplace interventions.

References

  1. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul 05;6:Doc09 [PMID: 21289882]
  2. BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 29;13:82 [PMID: 23356379]
  3. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Oct;13(5):482-8 [PMID: 17762223]
  4. J Affect Disord. 2003 Aug;75(3):209-21 [PMID: 12880934]
  5. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;48(2):173-81 [PMID: 23011445]
  6. Swiss Med Wkly. 2005 Feb 19;135(7-8):101-8 [PMID: 15832226]
  7. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Feb;55(2):164-71 [PMID: 22290159]
  8. Occup Environ Med. 2006 Jul;63(7):443-50 [PMID: 16698805]
  9. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 May 31;10(6):2214-40 [PMID: 23727902]
  10. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Feb;55(2):211-22 [PMID: 22290165]
  11. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12 [PMID: 19631508]
  12. Occup Environ Med. 2010 Jul;67(7):436-43 [PMID: 19819858]
  13. ANZ J Surg. 2013 Jul;83(7-8):512-5 [PMID: 23796266]
  14. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(46):781-7 [PMID: 22163259]
  15. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008 Mar;51(3):322-33 [PMID: 18369567]
  16. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422 [PMID: 11148311]
  17. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008 Apr;51(4):379-91 [PMID: 18357422]
  18. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008 Dec 05;3:32 [PMID: 19061497]
  19. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 Jan;85(1):67-79 [PMID: 21584721]
  20. Med Educ. 2007 Aug;41(8):788-800 [PMID: 17661887]
  21. Occup Med (Lond). 2010 Jun;60(4):277-86 [PMID: 20511268]
  22. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 May;66(3):287-91 [PMID: 21292810]
  23. J Affect Disord. 2007 Dec;104(1-3):103-10 [PMID: 17448543]
  24. Psychosoc Med. 2006 Oct 18;3:Doc05 [PMID: 19742072]
  25. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Dec;32(6):443-62 [PMID: 17173201]
  26. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Feb;57(2):147-53 [PMID: 12540692]
  27. Occup Environ Med. 2011 Sep;68(9):674-81 [PMID: 21177661]
  28. JAMA. 2004 Dec 15;292(23):2880-9 [PMID: 15598920]
  29. Psicothema. 2008 Aug;20(3):354-60 [PMID: 18674427]
  30. Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30:118-32 [PMID: 18587142]
  31. Eur J Public Health. 2011 Apr;21(2):190-6 [PMID: 20504950]
  32. Psychooncology. 2009 Oct;18(10):1019-28 [PMID: 19226512]
  33. Occup Environ Med. 2010 Mar;67(3):170-7 [PMID: 19737735]
  34. BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 04;13:538 [PMID: 23734632]
  35. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):698-704 [PMID: 17110646]
  36. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(11):1040-8 [PMID: 19242984]
  37. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Nov;60(11):887-91 [PMID: 14573721]
  38. J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Aug;46(8):866-75 [PMID: 15300139]
  39. Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jul;65(7):438-45 [PMID: 18417557]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0burnoutemotionalpsychosocialexhaustionstudiesworkingconditionscorecomponentsystematicreviewsearchworkplaceliteratureincludingcohortmethodologicallyadequaterelationshipdevelopmenthighdemandsroleHoweverAIMS:analyzeassociationundertakencase-controlrandomizedcontrolledtrialsMETHODS:MedlinePsycInfobaseddefinedstringstrictexclusioninclusioncriteriaEvaluation5599initiallyidentifiedhitstwoindependentreviewersdetailedqualityassessmentresultedsixconsideringonestudywellfiveRESULTS:resultspointexhaustion/burnoutParticularlyjobseemplaystrongintercorrelationsfactorsmatterprinciplemakeidentificationsinglefactorassociatedespeciallylowriskdifficultCONCLUSIONS:Multidimensionalapproachesreductionworkenhancementdecisionlatitudeimprovingsocialclimatemightpromisingpreventinginterventionurgentlyneededproveeffectivenessinterventions-

Similar Articles

Cited By (76)